Big Oil Called out for Greenwashing, Issues Essentially the Same Pre-COP Climate Pledge as Last Year

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
on

Big oil today outlined how it plans to do its bit to help curb warming to two degrees. The announcement comes on the same day the Paris Agreement formally comes intoย force.

Predictably, there remains a considerable gap between the companiesโ€™ commitments and the Paris Agreementโ€™sย goals.

Analysts say that to curb warming to two degrees, companies will have to leave around a third of oil reserves in the ground. So is that the revolutionary decision the companies todayย announced?

No.

As you might expect from a group including Shell, BP, Statoil and Total, they have different plans to solve the climate crisis. Plans that are unlikely to significantly curb emissions any time soon.

Solving Climate With Moreย Gas

The oil companiesโ€™ strategy was formally unveiled in the auspicious surroundings of Londonโ€™s Shard building by the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI), a โ€œCEO-led organization designed to catalyze practical action to reduce greenhouse gas emissionsโ€, according to its website.

Combined, the companies comprising OGCI account for over 20 percent of the worldโ€™s oilย supply.

At the core of these companiesโ€™ climate plan is setting up a $1 billion (ยฃ80m) fund to ramp us gas instead of coal, clean up the industryโ€™s own emissions, invest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology, and make cars moreย efficient.

Contrary to media reports leading up to the announcement, none of this money seems to be earmarked forย renewables.

One billion dollars might sound like a lot on the face of it but if you break it down, it comes to an average investment of $9.9m (ยฃ8m) per company per year for aย decade.

And as the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit points out, these companies have an annual budget of over $300 billion. So itโ€™s just a drop in the bucketย really.

And, more notably, none of those strategies require the world to significantly reduce oilย consumption.

As the announcement reads, the main focus will be on CCS and reducing methane emissions from gas โ€œin order to maximize the climate benefits of natural gas. The OGCI believes that these are areas where the oil and gas industry has meaningful influence and where its collaborative work can have the greatestย impact.โ€

Itโ€™s not the first time the OGCI has made this type of announcement. In advance of the landmark Paris climate conference last year, the same 10 CEOs pledged to โ€œplay their partโ€ in tackling climateย change.

Those plans included – you guessed it – ramping up gas, making the industry more efficient, investing in CCS, and improving the efficiency of roadย vehicles.

So itโ€™s perhaps no surprise that todayโ€™s announcement was met withย scepticism.

Grist said the strategy sounded somewhat like โ€œsweaty, desperate greenwashingโ€, though it conceded the companies could genuinely be driven by the existential crisis the industry faces as the worldย decarbonises.

Dr Jonathan Marshall from the Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit told DeSmog UK that the โ€œcompanies have vast budgets and a history of failing to deliver on promises surrounding climate change, so many are likely to be sceptical that this initiative will be any differentโ€.

Juliet Philips from investment campaign group ShareAction said: โ€œโ€˜Until initiatives like those announced by the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative are backed up by long-term corporate strategies that are consistent with achieving the Paris Treaty, scepticism of their sincerity isย inevitableโ€.

Charlie Satow from local activist group Divest London said: โ€œThe OGCI companies are projected to spend $85 billion into developing new reserves in 2016. Todayโ€™s launch is therefore nothing more than a cynical PR exercise, yet more greenwashing tactics designed to blind us to the simple reality. These companies are the problem, not the solution to climateย injustice.โ€

Even the UKโ€™s Telegraph โ€“ a generally conservative-leaning outlet โ€“ pointed out the convenience of announcing the plans today, as the companies โ€œseek to improve their environmental reputationโ€ in advance of the Marrakech climate talks that start on Monday.

Savingย Face

Industry representatives know theyโ€™re set for some awkward questions over the next two weeks as thousands of delegates descend on Marrakech for the latest round of climate negotiations. Todayโ€™s announcement is an attempt to fire the firstย shots.

This particular roguesโ€™ gallery has an awful lot to do if it is to persuade people that the industry is serious about climate change,ย however.

The OGCI is the latest in a long line of friendly sounding groups to front the industryโ€™s effort to appearย climate-friendly.

As Oil Change Internationalโ€™s profile of OGCI highlights, the group already has an imageย problem.

OGCIโ€™s website was set up by former tobacco-lawyer, Daniela Bara, and its PR is handled by Edelman, which has a history of representing climate deniers and coalย producers.

And thatโ€™s before you even get to the companies OGCIย represents.

Shell has previously been prosecuted for โ€˜greenwashingโ€™ in its advertising. BP has been branded Europeโ€™s โ€œstrongest advocate of dirty energyโ€ by NGO Influence Map. And Total remains very keen on drilling for oil in ever harder to reachย places.

Todayโ€™s announcement is further evidence that these companies continue to fundamentally deny that their business interests conflict with the Paris Agreementโ€™sย goals.

If the world is going to curb warming to 2 degrees โ€“ or even 1.5 degrees if countries are feeling ambitious โ€“ the oil industry is collectively sitting on a massive carbon bubble. Despite the OGCIโ€™s protestations, todayโ€™s announcement does not suggest the industry is genuinely planning to change its business model to help the world address climateย change.

As Anthony Hobley, CEO of Carbon Tracker, the first financial analysts to promote the concept of unburnable carbon, told DeSmog UK:

โ€œThese companies must match rhetoric with real action and stop tinkering around the edges. Big oil is still ignoring the fundamental risk the โ€˜carbon bubbleโ€™ poses and clinging to orthodox growth strategies by cherry-picking BAU (business as usual) industry scenarios that perpetuate a belief in strong fossil fuel demandย growth.โ€

So BP, Shell, Total, and their corporate friends are using the platform provided by the annual climate change conference to continue to push their agenda, which, as always, is to extract, burn, and sell moreย oil.

Photo: Trevor Littlewood via Geography | CC 2.0
Get Weekly News Updates

picture-25876-1571179299.jpg
Mat was DeSmog's Special Projects and Investigations Editor, and Operations Director of DeSmog UK Ltd. He was DeSmog UKโ€™s Editor from October 2017 to March 2021, having previously been an editor at Nature Climate Change and analyst at Carbon Brief.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.
on

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.
on

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.
on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.