Polish Coal Company Announced as First Sponsor of UN Climate Talks in Katowice

authordefault
on

One of Polandโ€™s leading coal companiesย has become the first official sponsor of the UN climate talks, which start in the southern city of Katowice nextย week.

Jastrzฤ™bska Spรณล‚ka Wฤ™glowa (JSW),ย a majority state-owned corporationย and the European Union’s largest producer of high-quality coking coal, has announced the partnership withย COP24 in a statement on itsย website.

The Polish Environment minister later announced that several other coal-sector companies had been chosen to sponsor this year’sย climateย talks.ย 

JSW said the partnership would guarantee โ€œthe companyโ€™s active participation in the event and the possibility of promoting pro-ecological changes in the miningย sectorโ€.

It added that through the partnership, the company will organise panel discussions to showcase the companyโ€™s environmental activities and will offer โ€œsolutionsโ€ that will allow the coal sector to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and use resources such as land and by-products moreย effectively.

Althoughย some coal-friendly countries such as the US and Poland have been pushing the idea of โ€œclean coalโ€, scientists from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have warned that the world needs to take โ€œrapid and unprecedented measuresโ€ to move away from fossil fuels and halve its greenhouse gas emission in the next 12 years to avoid catastrophic climateย change.ย 

Daniel Ozon, president of JSW, said that the company was โ€œhonouredโ€ to support the Polish Presidency of COP24 and hopes that the sponsorship will โ€œcontribute to the promotion of JSW as an environmental leader in the miningย industryโ€.

He added: โ€œWe want this international forum to strengthen the image of the JSW Group as the largest producer of coking coal and coke, which are the necessary ingredients for steel production and modern development, including for low-carbon industry and the innovative technologies of theย future.โ€

During the climate talks, JSW will provide hydrogen-powered bus for participants andย delegates.

In a press conferenceย reported by the AFP, Polish Environment minister Henryk Kowalczyk told reporters thatย coal-based energy companies PGE, Poland’s largest energy sector company,ย and Tauron, which is headquartered in Katowice, had also been chosen as COP24ย sponsors.ย 

Poland’s PZU insurance giant, PKO BP bank, and the PGNiG natural gas company have also been announced as sponsors โ€” makingย all six COP24 partnersย state-ownedย companies.ย 

JSW‘s statement adds that during the talks, Poland wants to focus the attention of other countries on the three issues of nature, man, andย technology.

It adds: โ€œAccording to the Polish Presidency, a solidary and just socio-economic transformation is necessary while achieving climate neutrality, among others by absorbing carbon dioxide throughย forests.โ€

This yearโ€™s climate talks is another pivotal moment in the global climate negotiations and will see countries finalise the rulebook to the landmark Parisย Agreement.

Sriram Madhusoodanan, deputy campaigns director at the NGO Corporate Accountability, told DeSmog UK that the fact the negotiation charged with solvingย the global climate crisis are โ€œbeing bankrolled by Big Coal is absolutelyย unacceptableโ€.

He added: โ€œBig polluter sponsors like JSW are not only able to use sponsorship to greenwash their images, but also sponsorship will likely buy them access to the talks themselves โ€” a massive conflict ofย interest.ย 

โ€œSuch sponsorship raises serious questions about what access and influence sponsorship buys and could risk calling into question the legitimacy of these talks before they even begin. Big polluters have no place bankrolling or participating in the UN climateย talks.โ€ย 

Deputy executive secretary at UN Climate Change (formerly UNFCCC),ย Ovais Sarmad, told DeSmog UK sponsors gained no access to participate in or influence the political negotiationsย andย decision-making.ย 

He said: โ€œMany governments that host climate COPs seek out sponsors to provide funding to cover conference costs, which can be significant.ย These sponsors typically include other governments and/or private businesses. The choice of sponsors is a national matter for the host government and does not involve the United Nations or the Conference of the Parties (i.e. the Memberย states).ย ย 

โ€œAccording to the most recent report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement will clearly require an urgent reduction in the use of fossil fuels, with the aim of achieving net zero emissions of greenhouse gases by mid-century. Many countries, however, have important investments in fossil fuel production. If we are to achieve progress on global climate action, it is necessary that the concerns of the fossil fuel sector are highlighted in the intergovernmentalย discussions.โ€ย 

Update: The story was updated on 28th November to include the annoucement of further sponsors by the Polish Environmentย minister.ย 

Image Credit: Theย Beล‚chatรณw lignite coal mine in Poland. Phil MacDonald/Wikimedia Commons/CC BYSAย 4.0

Related Posts

on

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.

Major oil and gas firms are being represented by lobbyists that have given more than ยฃ300,000 in support to Keir Starmerโ€™s party.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.
on

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.