EPA Decides Not to Regulate Fracking Wastewater as Pennsylvania Study Reveals Recent Spike

1-DSC09675
on

On April 23, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) told two environmental groups that it had decided it was โ€œnot necessaryโ€ to update the federal standards handling toxic waste from oil and gas wells, including the waste produced byย fracking.

State regulators have repeatedly provedย unable to prevent the industryโ€™s toxic waste from entering Americaโ€™s drinking water supplies, including both private wells and the rivers from which public drinking water supplies are drawn, the Environmental Protection Agency concluded in a 2017 national study.

The corrosive salt-laden wastewater from fracked wells has been spread on roads as a de-icer. Itโ€™s been sprayed into the air in the hopes of evaporating the water โ€” a practice that spreads its blend of volatile chemicals into the air instead. Oil industry wastewater has even been used to irrigate crops โ€” in California, where state regulators haven’t set rules to keep dangerous chemicals like the carcinogen benzene out of irrigationย water.

If equally contaminated waste came from other industries, it would usually be designated hazardous waste and subject to strict tracking and disposal rules designed to keep the public safe from industrial pollution. But in July 1988, after burying clear warnings from its own scientists about the hazards of oilfield waste, the EPA offered the oil and gas industry a broad exemption from hazardous waste handlingย laws.

The EPA‘s decision this week echoesย that.

โ€œRather than acting in the best interest of the public, EPA has continually shirked its duties and left our communitiesโ€™ health, drinking water, and environment at risk,โ€ said Adam Kron, senior attorney at the Environmental Integrity Project, one of the two groups that had asked the agency to consider its stance towards the waste. โ€œEPA has known since 1988 that its rules for oil and gas wastes arenโ€™t up toย par.โ€

In the meantime, regulation has been left to the states โ€” and the rules can varyย widely.

Toxic Waste and Cancer inย Pennsylvania

The decision comes as a new study, published in the peer-reviewed journalย Science of the Total Environment, calls attention to the oil and gas waste produced in Pennsylvania for nearly that entireย time.

The oil and gas industry has flooded Pennsylvania with over 380 million barrels of liquid waste from 1991 to 2017, that study found โ€” enough to fill an area the size of a standard city block with a column of wastewater over 200 feetย tall.

And that flood has been picking up pace. One out of every seven of those gallons was produced in 2017ย alone.


Pennsylvania wastewater production, largely from โ€œunconventionalโ€ gas wells, rose sharply in 2017. Credit:ย Science of the Total Environment, Hill et al.ย 2019

A full 80 percent of the waste produced by the oil and gas industry in Pennsylvania stayed in Pennsylvania โ€” or at least thatโ€™s as far as the Commonwealthโ€™s reporting system trackedย it.

โ€œPennsylvania also has the third highest cancer incidence rate of all U.S. states,โ€ Environmental Health News reported, citing data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. โ€œApproximately half of all Pennsylvanians will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lifetime, and about one in five Pennsylvanians will die ofย cancer.โ€

Fifty-five known chemicals that fracked oil and gas operations releaseย into the air and the water can cause cancer, a Yale Public Health analysis found last year. Oil and gas workers are routinely exposed to dangerous levels of cancer-causing chemicals like benzene, a 2014 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Healthย found.

Fracking has also been linked to asthma, low birth weights, and other health problems. โ€œOur examination of the peer-reviewed medical and public health literature uncovered no evidence that fracking can be practiced in a manner that does not threaten human health,โ€ aย 266-page reportย by Concerned Health Professionals of New York and Physicians for Social Responsibility found inย 2018.

Child on a slide in a Pennsylvania playground near a drilling well pad.
Pennsylvania elementary school playground near a well padย in Butler County. Credit:ย Moms Clean Air Force,ย CC BYNCSAย 2.0

Toxic andย Radioactive

While many researchers have focused on just the waste from fracked shale wells (considered โ€œunconventionalโ€ oil and gas), the new study looks at the wastewater from conventional oil and gas wells in Pennsylvania as well. The waste from both Marcellus shale wells and โ€œconventionalโ€ wells can carry a wide range of pollutants andย carcinogens.

โ€œRadium is brought up with oil and gas wastewater for both conventional and unconventional oil and gas production,โ€ explained Lee Ann L. Hill, who is lead author of the report and with the research and policy instituteย PSE (Physicians, Scientists, and Engineers) Healthyย Energy.

Radioactive materials โ€” for example, the radium isotopes associated with drilling โ€” have been found in the sediments downstream from treatment plants, which are often ill-equipped to handle the blend of corrosive salts, trade-secret chemicals, and radioactive elements produced by the stateโ€™s oil and gasย industry.

โ€œ7.6 percentย of the wastewater over the whole study period, 1991 to 2017, was discharged to surface water,โ€ Hill, an Environmental Health Program Associate, added. โ€œThat ended up being 30 millionย barrels.โ€

Tracking Toxic Waste โ€” to its Firstย Stop

In the absence of federal hazardous waste rules, which require stop-by-stop tracking of dangerous toxic waste, states are left to craft their own requirements for the drilling industry โ€” and left to enforceย them.

Pennsylvania is one of the only places that requires drillers to file details about their solid and liquid waste to a centralized public reporting system โ€” offering independent researchers a chance to understand how much waste drillers produced and where it all went โ€” or at least where drillers told the state about theirย waste.

Appalachian oil waste disposal sites
Reported disposal locations for oil and gas drilling wastewater from Pennsylvania in 2017. Credit: Science of the Total Environment, Hill et al.ย 2019

But the data is still incomplete, and not just because itโ€™sย self-reported.

The Commonwealth requires drillers to report how much waste they produce and where it is shipped for disposal โ€” but drillers are allowed to list temporary holding facilities โ€” like wastewater โ€œimpoundmentsโ€ or pits โ€” in their reporting, without filing an update to show where the waste ultimatelyย went.

โ€œIn addition, a third of the liquid waste across all years in the inventory lack a reported final destination,โ€ the study concludes.

Itโ€™s a problem that appears to be getting worse in recent years. In 2017, 41 percentย of the wastewater that drillers told Pennsylvania they produced wasnโ€™t tracked all the way through to disposal, researchersย said.

And while drillers reported sites in Pennsylvania as the first stop for 80 percent of the waste, a significant amount has found its way into neighboring states like New York and Ohio, the studyย found.

Over 650,000 tons of solid waste from Pennsylvania’s drilling industry was hauled into New York state from 2010 to 2017, the researchers found, including about 20,000 tons inย 2017.

Roughly 31 million barrels of liquid waste was shipped directly out-of-state during that time, the report found, with Ohio taking 29.3 million barrels and West Virginia receiving 1.44 million barrels of wastewater fromย Pennsylvania.

โ€œIt really brings to light that there is definitely inter-state involvement when you talk about oil and gas activities,โ€ said Hill. โ€œIt’s not just isolated to one state โ€” neighboring states are tied together when dealing with wasteย management.โ€

But at least for the moment, the Trump administrationโ€™s Environmental Protection Agency has decided not to step in, at least not where hazardous waste laws areย concerned.

Representatives from civic groups who had asked the EPA to regulate responded in aย statement.

โ€œDisposal of waste from oil and gas operations is one of the biggest challenges the industry faces,โ€ Barbara Jarmoska, board member of the Responsible Drilling Alliance, said in a statement responding to the announcement. โ€œFailure to update rules for the disposal and handling of dangerous oil and gas wastes is an egregious dereliction of duty and an intolerable threat to the health and safety of Americanย citizens.โ€

Main image:ย Fracking fluid and other drilling wastes are dumped into an unlined pit located right up against the Petroleum Highway in Kern County, California.ย Credit: Sarah Craig/Faces of Fracking,ย CC BYNCND 2.0ย 
1-DSC09675
Sharon Kelly is an attorney and investigative reporter based in Pennsylvania. She was previously a senior correspondent at The Capitol Forum and, prior to that, she reported for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Nation, Earth Island Journal, and a variety of other print and online publications.

Related Posts

on

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.

The decision to allow Novatek to attend the flagship conference was described as โ€œdisappointingโ€ and โ€œdisturbingโ€ by campaigners.
on

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.

Badenochโ€™s leadership campaign was part-funded by a board member at one of the worldโ€™s largest fossil fuel companies.
Analysis
on

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.
on

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.

Campaigners raise concerns over โ€˜alarmingโ€™ potential conflicts in the powerful political grouping.