Leurs propres mots : Les figures réformistes et conservatrices de premier plan qui ont fait l’éloge de Trump

La droite britannique s'est étroitement alliée à une administration qui a perdu le soutien du public américain.
Analyse
on
Série: MAGA
A DeSmog collage of two images – one of Donald Trump and Nigel Farage; one of Donald Trump and Kemi Badenoch. Credit: White House / Kemi Badenoch / X

U.S. President Donald Trump suffered a spectacular setback in the country’s midterm elections this week, with Democrats taking control of Congress and the Republicans losing races in their traditional heartlands.

The election was a rebuke to Trump’s increasingly unpopular presidency. Voters expressed frustration with the cost of living and the economy, while the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran – which has driven up fuel prices – has proven to be a major political liability.

Trump’s political fortunes have also been damaged by his administration’s aggressive immigration enforcement. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the agency at the centre of his mass deportation drive, has become a flashpoint and an emblem of Trump’s autocratic rule.

Yet, across the Atlantic, some of the UK’s most senior right-wing politicians have spent recent years enthusiastically praising Trump, celebrating his political leadership, and seeking to emulate his policies.

Réformer le Royaume-Uni leader Nigel Farage has repeatedly presented himself as one of Trump’s most enthusiastic international allies. At a Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) event in February 2025, he a déclaré that Trump is “the bravest man I know”.

Farage aussi décrit the president’s 2024 election victory as a source of inspiration for his own political ambitions. “This is all going to blow back and help us. We are now topping every opinion poll in Britain, and we are going to win the next general election,” he said.

With Reform falling in the polls and the party facing police et parlementaire investigations, that prospect now seems increasingly unlikely.

Meanwhile, Conservative Party leader Nous avons Badenoch has similarly celebrated Trump’s return to office and his second term agenda.

À la Alliance pour une citoyenneté responsable (ARC) conference in February 2025, Badenoch référencé her party’s defeat at the 2024 general election and her subsequent election as Tory leader, saying: “People ask me what difference new leadership will make? Well, take a look at President Trump.”

She continued: “He’s showing that sometimes you need that first stint in government to spot the problems, but it’s the second time around when you really know how to fix them.”

And this enthusiasm has extended beyond rhetoric. Reform and Conservative politicians have embraced Trump’s calls for expanded fossil fuel extraction, praised his drive to slash the state, and proposed British versions of his immigration enforcement operation.

Meanwhile, as revealed by DeSmog, influential right-wing Westminster pressure groups have accepté 20 millions de dollars from U.S. sources, including major Trump donors, over the past decade – while MPs have received more than £300,000 for attending Trump-aligned events since the 2024 UK general election.

‘Drill, Baby, Drill’

Few policy areas illustrate the ideological alignment between Trump and Britain’s right-wing parties more clearly than oil and gas.

Trump began his second presidency by demanding that Britain abandon restrictions on North Sea extraction. On 3 January 2025, he posté on Truth Social: “The UK is making a very big mistake. Open up the North Sea. Get rid of Windmills!”

And his administration has made expanding domestic fossil fuel production a central policy objective, encapsulated by the slogan “drill, baby, drill”.

The Conservatives and Reform have both echoed that mantra, arguing that Britain should maximise extraction from its diminuer North Sea reserves rather than pursue a transition away from fossil fuels.

In September 2025, Badenoch met Trump at the White House. Afterwards, she made clear that the North Sea had featured prominently in their discussions.

The Conservative leader écrit on the social media platform X: “Not surprised Trump was so emphatic. It’s all we spoke about last night. We have to get our oil and gas out of the North Sea.”

She added: “We have to make the most of our natural resources. It’s mad to leave billions of £ in there.”

The comments reflected Badenoch’s commitment to maximising fossil fuel extraction at the expense of the UK’s climate commitments – mise en gage to scrap the 2050 net zero emissions target that the Conservative Party introduced in office.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch.

Credit: JD Vance / X

Reform has gone even further in adopting Trump’s pro-oil language.

Speaking at a fundraiser for the Institut Heartland – a U.S. climate science denial group – in September 2024, Farage exhorté the country to re-elect Trump so the Republican could enact his “drill, baby, drill” agenda.

Reform has pursued an anti-climate manifesto modelled on Trump’s policies – pledging to remove the ban on fracking for shale gas, open new coal plants, and scrap subsidies for renewable energy.

In summer 2025, Reform’s mayor of Greater Lincolnshire Andrea Jenkyns la ficelle d'étiquettes/étiquettes volantes en carton representatives of oil and gas company Egdon Resources, owned by Texas-based Heyco Energy, and promised to echo the Trump administration’s approach to drilling.

“Donald [Trump] is wise,” she dit. “We value our oil and gas industries and know that they are essential for Britain’s energy security and to fuel our homes.”

Jenkyns has been a vocal supporter of fracking, dire: “I want to turn the countryside into Swiss cheese and just go for it.” 

Egdon claims it has discovered huge deposits of natural gas in the Gainsborough Trough basin in Lincolnshire, which it would extract through fracking – a practice banned in the UK due to its impacts environnementaux et sanitaires.

As revealed by DeSmog, George Yates, who owns Egdon and Heyco, is a Trump donor.

Like Trump – who has called climate change the “greatest con job ever perpetrated on the world” – Farage has frequently spread climate science denial. Speaking at the 2025 ARC conference, he claimed it’s “absolutely nuts” for carbon dioxide to be considered a pollutant.

En fait, le Groupe d'experts intergouvernemental sur l'évolution du climat (GIEC) des Nations Unies, principal organisme scientifique mondial sur le climat, a A déclaré que le dioxyde de carbone « est responsable de la majeure partie du réchauffement climatique » depuis la fin du XIXe siècle, ce qui a accru « la gravité et la fréquence des phénomènes météorologiques et climatiques extrêmes, comme les vagues de chaleur, les fortes pluies et la sécheresse ».

‘A British DOGE’

Trump’s drive to slash federal spending, overseen initially by Elon Musk through the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has been another major source of inspiration for Britain’s right.

The initiative was a central feature of Trump’s early second-term agenda, promising to reduce the size of the federal government. It also drew widespread controversy over licenciements collectifs, le accès of private data, the démantèlement of international aid programmes, and the extent of Musk’s unprecedented influence over the administration.

However, both Badenoch and Farage have explicitly endorsed the idea of importing DOGE to Britain.

In February 2025, Badenoch told The Telegraph’s Daily T podcast that Britain needed a similar scheme.

Asked whether the UK needed its own version of DOGE, she répondu: “I think so” – adding: “If you remember in my campaign launch speech, I said that we need to reboot [and] rewire the state. This is what we have to do.”

Badenoch added: “We have to do something like DOGE … We have to have a revolution on this.”

Farage was equally enthusiastic. At Reform’s March 2025 local elections campaign launch, he dit supporters: “Frankly folks, what we need in this country to pay for the cuts that people deserve and need, we need a British form of DOGE, as Elon Musk has got in America. Let’s have a British DOGE.”

chef adjoint de la réforme Richard Tice called for: “a sort of county-by-county equivalent of a DOGE” at the same event, asking supporters: “Do you want to make Britain great again?”

Elon Musk, portant une casquette de baseball noire « Make America Great Again », est assis, avec le logo de la CPAC derrière lui sur un podium gris et un fond bleu.
Billionaire and DOGE lead Elon Musk at CPAC 2025. Credit: Zach Roberts

And the party has attempted to implement this agenda in local government.

In June 2025, Reform annoncé the creation of a DOGE team intended to identify and cut spending in its local councils.

The initiative was presented as a direct counterpart to Musk’s American project. Reform’s then-chair, Zia Yusuf, dit: “For too long British people have been British taxpayers have watched their money vanish into a black hole.”

He continued: “As promised, we have created a UK DOGE to identify and cut wasteful spending of taxpayer money. Our team will use cutting-edge technology and deliver real value for voters.”

Yusuf also lauded Musk – a far-right tech baron – as “the ideal person” to lead Trump’s DOGE agency.

Despite Reform’s strong language, its local DOGE operation hasn’t achieved dramatic “cost savings” for taxpayers. In February, Paul Chamberlain, a Reform cabinet member responsible for Kent Council’s DOGE agenda, Conté Financial Times: “We made some assumptions that we would come in here and find some of the craziness that DOGE found in America and that was wrong, we didn’t find any of that.”

ICE and Mass Deportations

Immigration enforcement has been another area where British right-wing politicians have sought to emulate Trump.

In August 2025, Farage unveiled plans to detain and deport migrants who have entered Britain through irregular routes. Yusuf outlined the proposed system for implementing the policy, including a dedicated deportation force – modelled on ICE – and a data-sharing system connecting government agencies.

Il a dit: “We will pair this legislative reset with a UK deportation command – that is a dedicated force to identifying, detaining and deporting illegal migrants at scale.”

Yusuf ajoutée: “We’ll create a cutting edge data fusion centre that will automatically share data between the police, the Home Office, the NHS, the DVLA, HMRC and banks.”

In September 2026, Farage even dit he wanted to “hijack” Trump’s ICE advisor, Tom Homan, and bring him to Britain “to secure our borders”.

The Conservatives have also explicitly drawn on the U.S. model. In October 2025, Badenoch annoncé plans for a new ‘Removals Force’ modelled on ICE, with powers to identify, detain and deport people without legal immigration status.

The proposals included facial recognition and a requirement for police to check people against biometric border data.

When Badenoch was asked whether Trump would approve of the policy, she replied: “I wouldn’t be surprised if he loved it.”

La guerre contre l'Iran

The Iran war has proven to be politically disastrous for Trump and the Republican Party – a fact now reconnu by U.S. Vice President JD Vance – but senior right-wing figures in the UK were quick to support the president’s military intervention.

Badenoch was among the most vocal Conservative supporters of the bombing campaign – saying in January 2026, amid protests against Iran’s government, that elle soutiendrait American intervention if it took place “with a broad coalition of countries”.

Asked whether the U.S. and its allies should help remove the Iranian regime, Badenoch répondu: “I think that given the threat that we’re seeing to the people, I think that would be right”.

She qualified her position by insisting that any intervention had to be judged against Britain’s national interest.

When Trump and Israel launched their attacks in February, Badenoch supported their actions and criticised Prime Minister Keir Starmer for refusing to join the initial offensive.

She argued that Britain should “do more than catch arrows” and “take out” Iranian missile launchers.

Explaining her position, she dit: “When missiles are being fired, the launchers which are kept deep underground come out. If you take out the capacity, that means that they will stop sending missiles over. So don’t just catch the arrows. Stop the archer.”

Badenoch has subsequently denied that she had called for Britain to join the offensive strikes, claiming: “I said that we support their actions. I never said we should join.”

Nigel Farage, chef du parti Reform UK. Crédit : Chambre des communes (CC BY-3.0)
Nigel Farage, dirigeant du parti Reform UK.

Crédit:
Chambre des communes
(CC BY-3.0)

The calls for British intervention were particularly pronounced among Reform’s senior figures, including Tice and former Conservative chancellor Nadhim Zahawi, who defected to Reform in January 2026.

Zahawi dit The Sun that Britain should participate in the U.S.-Israeli operation. “Whatever the U.S. needs we should make all of our assets available,” he said. “That means bases, hardware, logistics. We should join the bombing if needed.”

Il a ensuite dit Times Radio that Britain should “make everything available to our greatest ally, the United States of America”.

Tice was similarly explicit. Appearing on Saudi broadcaster Al Arabiya in March, Farage’s deputy a déclaré que a Reform government: “would be helping the Americans and the Israelis in any way they saw appropriate” and would be “pleased to help” with offensive missions if asked.

Andrea Jenkyns went further, refusing to rule out British troops being deployed on the ground. Asked on Sky News whether she wanted to see British forces in Iran, she said: “Ideally not at this stage”, but added: “you can’t rule anything out. Look, it’s too hostile and we don’t know the direction it’s going in. But should we be using more of our weapons and should the [HMS] Dragon be there already? Most certainly.”

They were following Farage’s lead. On 28 February, the Reform leader tweeted: “The Prime Minister needs to change his mind on the use of our military bases and back the Americans in this vital fight against Iran!”

Quelques jours plus tard, dit-il the UK’s “inaction” in failing to join the war was “frankly pathetic”.

Gaza and Venezuela

Beyond Iran, senior figures on the British right have repeatedly applauded Trump’s willingness to remake the international order – even when his interventions have provoked widespread condemnation.

In February 2025, Farage welcomed Trump’s proposal to take control of Gaza and relocate its population.

Il a dit: “I love that notion. The thought of a wealthy, wonderful thriving place with well-paid jobs, casinos, nightlife … it all sounds very appealing to me.”

Farage added: “I’m not here to answer for everything the Trump administration has to say.”

Mais il a aussi acclamé Trump’s early presidency more broadly: “promises made, promises kept, quite extraordinary” he said – adding: “So without being specific on Gaza, I would just say I think he’s off the most incredible start.”

Farage aussi décrit Trump’s use of tariffs – some of which have been imposed on the UK – as a “transactional tool” which the president uses “amazingly effectively”. These tariffs are now blâmé for creating high costs in working class areas of America that rely on manufacturing.

Meanwhile, Badenoch was also supportive of Trump’s intervention in Venezuela where, in January, the U.S. captured President Nicholás Maduro.

“Venezuela was a brutal regime,” Badenoch dit – adding: “I think what’s happened is quite extraordinary. But I understand why America has done it.”

Asked whether the intervention was morally justified, Badenoch répondu: “Morally, yes.”

The MAGA Model

The relationship between Trump and Britain’s right extends beyond individual endorsements of his policies, encompassing a wider network of political organisations, ideological allies, and campaign groups.

Few British political figures have embraced Trump’s project as enthusiastically as Liz Truss, who has reinvented herself as a MAGA evangelist since leaving Downing Street.

Truss was even tacheté at Trump’s Florida Mar-a-Lago estate on the night of the midterm elections, giving her a front-row seat to the electoral hammering inflicted on the Republicans.

Yet Truss has championed the very policies that underpinned the disastrous results.

Speaking at CPAC in February 2025, the former prime minister a déclaré: “We want a Trump revolution in Britain.” She called for Musk and his “nerd army of Muskrats” to examine the British “deep state”, and said the UK should participate in what she described as the “second American revolution”.

“We see President Trump in the executive, in the Oval Office signing off executive orders, and we want some of that in Britain,” Truss told the conference. “We want drill, baby, drill. We want men banned from women’s bathrooms and women’s sports. We want illegal immigrants deported. We want taxes to be cut. We want a Trump revolution in Britain.”

Truss has since become the chair of CPAC UK, bringing the pro-Trump jamboree to Britain. The event, hosted in July, was addressed by Farage – despite the Reform leader suggérer Il avait auparavant déclaré qu'il se tiendrait « à bonne distance » du sommet. 

Former Conservative prime minister Liz Truss. Credit: Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)
Liz Truss, ancienne première ministre conservatrice.

Crédit:
Simon Dawson / No 10 Downing Street
(CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)

Andrew Griffith, the Conservative Party’s shadow chancellor, also addressed the event and has developed close ties to Trump’s MAGA network.

Meanwhile, Farage has helped to import an influential U.S. climate science denial group, the Institut Heartlandau Royaume-Uni. Le leader du parti Réformiste était l'orateur principal. orateur lors du lancement de la branche Royaume-Uni-UE du Heartland Institute en décembre 2024, quelques mois après exhortant le groupe va établir un satellite en Europe.

Directeur de Heartland Institute Royaume-Uni-UE Lois Perry prétentions Elle conseille le parti sur sa politique climatique et est directrice de la stratégie de Reform Friends of Israel, un groupe de lobbying au sein du parti.

And Farage has been forging ties with Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) – a powerful legal advocacy group that led the campaign to overturn Roe v Wade, the landmark ruling that protected the constitutional right to abortion in the United States.

La branche britannique des ADF a dépensé plus de 1.4 million de livres sterling sur ses activités en 2025, plus de trois fois supérieur à celui de 2020. Farage n'a pas seulement figuraient sur des supports promotionnels publié par l'ADF, mais selon le New York Times, le groupe a organisé une visite par le leader de Reform à Washington DC en septembre 2025, au cours duquel il a témoigné devant le Congrès. 

ADF has also reportedly arranged backroom meetings between Farage and State Department officials on their visits to London.

“President Trump’s victory represents the rejection of open borders, socialist economics, woke ideology, net zero fanaticism and [diversity, equity, and inclusion schemes] by right thinking people in America,” Zia Yusuf posté after the president’s election victory in November 2024, adding: “The UK is next.”

Two years on, the American electorate is rejecting the Trump project. His increasingly unpopular presidency, and Reform’s own faltering fortunes, suggest the MAGA model may be losing its appeal on both sides of the Atlantic.

Photo de l'auteur - Amazon petit
Sam dirige la couverture de la politique britannique pour DeSmog et était auparavant journaliste d'investigation à la BBC.

Articles similaires

on
L'agence assouplit la réglementation sur le méthane tout en conservant son pouvoir de la légiférer. Les critiques estiment que cette position laisse la législation fédérale sur le climat dans l'incertitude, risquant d'entraîner un recul plus important ultérieurement.
on
Lord Agnew et Paul Marshall, également propriétaire du journal The Spectator, sont actionnaires d'Equinor et de Shell.
on
Entretien avec Astra Taylor, co-auteure avec Naomi Klein de « Le fascisme de la fin des temps et le combat pour le monde vivant ».
Analyse
on
Les entreprises qui ont adhéré à ces règles volontaires pourraient les enfreindre au Canada et aux États-Unis.