Incorrigible Lomborg: Defending the right of rich people to pollute

authordefault
on

The Disingenuous Environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg has once again celebrated a public epiphany on climate change, bringing him. once again, to the conclusion that the globe is warming, that humans are to blame and that we – especially we rich people – shouldn’t do anything aboutย it.

In Lomborg’s latest feint, he suckered some reporter at London’s Financial Times into reporting that he has broken common cause with the โ€œclimate scepticsโ€ and called for an a global agreement on climate change in this December’s Kyoto negotiations inย Copenhagen.

But if you read the details, his position is the same as ever: that it would be a โ€œmistakeโ€ to try to get rich countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. Lomborg’s choice is to concentrate on every other thing – and especially to think about ignoring the problem in the short term, putting our energies into adaptation and โ€œweighing up whether emission cuts are cheaper to do now orย later.โ€

This is insincere drivel, typical of everything that Lomborg has been saying about climate change for years. He has positioned himself as an โ€œenvironmentalistโ€ – as someone who acknowledges the danger of climate change. But he has then built carefully contrived arguments that totally ignore the cumulative nature of the climate change threat. His โ€œlet’s-do’nothing-soonโ€ strategy also serves perfectly the agenda of the big energy producers – and the think tanks that so frequently hire Lomborg as a guest speaker – all of whom want to maintain the profitable status quo, leaving the problem to be solved by developing nations or by futureย generations.

There is nothing new in this โ€œnewโ€ position. It’s straight out of the Exxon playbook and the Financial Times should be embarrassed to have been led by the nose to reporting this as if it is a legitimateย update.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.

The acclaimed climate accountability journalist says bold steps are needed to reverse the insidious impact of decades of industry propaganda on the public square.
on

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.

With a U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on whether the company can be held liable for climate deception, internal documents show a campaign to question science.
on

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.

Judges highlight stories revealing oil and advertising industry tactics for prolonging the fossil fuel era.
on

Campaigners say advertising and PR agencies are โ€œnowhere closeโ€ to giving up their oil and gas clients.

Campaigners say advertising and PR agencies are โ€œnowhere closeโ€ to giving up their oil and gas clients.