Bush's Trump Card: More Gallons Per Mile

authordefault
onFeb 7, 2006 @ 08:34 PST

Card rapped as stooge: Critics say energy advice is tainted

The Boston Herald, Feb. 7, 2006

Environmentalists yesterday blasted President Bush’s energy budget as the product of an administration dominated by ex-oil and auto industry executives — including former auto lobbyist turned White House chief of staff Andrew Card.

The administration defended its proposed energy spending plan as an attempt to wean the nation off foreign oil, something Bush vowed to do during last week’s State of the Union address in which he said the nation was “addicted” to oil. Among other things, the administration yesterday outlined its plan to eliminate $61 million now earmarked for oil and gas research.

The president’s budget proposal also includes nearly a half-billion dollars in new funds for scientific research into new energy technologies.

But critics ripped into the president’s plan, saying it devotes hundreds of millions of dollars to promote nuclear energy and to open up drilling in the Artic Circle.

Jeremy Marin, a regional representative in the Sierra Club’s Boston office, said the entire Bush energy policy has been flawed since Bush took office in 2001.

He noted that many administration officials came from the oil and auto industries, including Card, a Massachusetts native who previously served as head of the now-defunct American Automobile Manufacturers Association and later as a lobbyist for General Motors.

“If Andrew Card and the White House wanted to do something for America, (then) they would require cars to go farther on a gallon of gas,” said Marin, saying the administration’s call last year to increase auto fuel-efficiency standards was inadequate.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onNov 25, 2025 @ 22:00 PST

The programme is “yet another bung to industrial production”, experts say.

The programme is “yet another bung to industrial production”, experts say.
Analysis
onNov 24, 2025 @ 09:00 PST

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.

Critics say new LNG ventures in British Columbia saddle Indigenous communities with debt, opaque ownership structures, and financial risk that could leave them owing billions.
onNov 24, 2025 @ 07:38 PST

Campaigners have highlighted the irony of the Tory peer warning about threats to free speech at a think tank bankrolled by a repressive regime.

Campaigners have highlighted the irony of the Tory peer warning about threats to free speech at a think tank bankrolled by a repressive regime.
Analysis
onNov 21, 2025 @ 16:13 PST

Corporate pledges to fight deforestation by turning degraded pasture into cropland seen boosting demand for harmful chemical inputs.

Corporate pledges to fight deforestation by turning degraded pasture into cropland seen boosting demand for harmful chemical inputs.