When Does Scientific Quibbling Become Unethical Lying?

authordefault
on

In the Science Background sectionย of the The Friends of Science website, the authors go to extremes to argue that climate change is NOT occurring, and then they sayย this:

โ€œPossible Explanations For Global Climateย Change:

โ€œIf the burning of fossil fuels was not the cause of earlier changes in climate, what might the possibilitiesย be?โ€

They then offer four โ€œexplanationsโ€ for who, only moments before, they were arguing was non-existent climate change: Two of those explanation (outdated theorizing about sunspot activity and polar ice caps) have been discredited; one of which seems in no way relevant in the current instance (orbital wobble) andย the last of which isย this:

โ€œOcean Currents: Currents are critical agents in the distribution of heat across the Earth’s surface. Broecker and more recently, Gagosian of the Woods Hole Institute, have highlighted the possibility that a reorganization of the Gulf Stream in the North Atlantic might cause an abrupt cooling in North America and inย Europe.โ€

Would it not have been relevant to mention that the Woods Hole Institute’s research indicated that anthropogenic climate change was the cause of the โ€œreorganization of the Gulf Stream.โ€? In choosing NOT to mention that fact, were the authors being careless orย mendacious?

And is all this considered โ€œfriendlyโ€ toย science?ย 

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€

GOP Sen. Thom Tillis took to Senate floor to decry lobbyists like Alex Epstein pushing huge energy moves โ€œwithout a clue about what they are potentially doing to our grid.โ€
Series: MAGA
on

Paying for social license is 'no substitute for solving environmental problems,' say critics.

Paying for social license is 'no substitute for solving environmental problems,' say critics.
on

The agencyโ€™s work for the fossil fuel industry has made it โ€œcomplicit in causing existential harm to people and planetโ€, say campaigners, who are calling on WPP to drop those clients.

The agencyโ€™s work for the fossil fuel industry has made it โ€œcomplicit in causing existential harm to people and planetโ€, say campaigners, who are calling on WPP to drop those clients.
on

The Alberta premier wants to replace coal and mine it at the same time.

The Alberta premier wants to replace coal and mine it at the same time.