DeSmog

The Inconvenient Truth about Robert C. Balling

authordefault
on

In a recent post in The Citizen.com, Dr. Robert C. Balling, director of the$8 million invested in skeptic movement Office of Climatology at Arizona State University, launches pseudo-scientific attack on Al Gore’s move, An InconvenientĀ Truth.

As with a clutch of other industry-funded academics who quibble over climate change, Dr. Balling is happy to use his Ph.D. and his title to suggest expertise and to imply scientific objectivity. But readers might be better able to judge the quality of his input if they knew that he has been the eager recipient of funding from such philanthropic organizations as ExxonMobil, the British Coal Corporation, Cyprus Minerals and OPEC. Per the link above, Sourcewatch lists his take from these sources at a little over $400,000 in the last 10Ā years.

Related Posts

on

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.
on

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.