DeSmog

Senator Jim Inhofe: Some Reich; Some Propagandist

authordefault
on

“Those who are familiar with Senator Jim Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) know he is aSen. Jim Inhofe straight shooter who speaks his mind,” says the liberal-media bashing NewsBusters.org blog. And the contents of his mind are, to some degree, evident in his 2003 claim on the floor of the U.S. Congress that global warming is “the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people.”

Inhofe has now clarified that view further in an interview with the Tulsa World, in which he says the the campaign, most recently led by the likes of Al Gore and Tom Brokaw (on Discovery Channel) is an outrage. “It kind of reminds … I could use the Third Reich, the big lie,” Inhofe said.

The Nazi reference is offensively over the top, of course, but we’re sympathetic to the Senator’s view that this debate features more than its fair share of unfounded propaganda. The question is whether those innacuracies and overstatements are being driven by an inexplicable international conspiracy of the most accomplished climate scientists in the world, or by the self-serving sorts in the energy industry and their client politicians, who have a direct financial interest in delaying any policies that will discourage the overuse of fossil fuels.

Related Posts

on

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labour’s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labour’s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

Clintel’s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the group’s transatlantic ties.

Clintel’s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the group’s transatlantic ties.
on

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires « fortement défectueux », tandis que l’analyse de DeSmog révèle l'absence de représentation de la société civile ou des communautés locales affectées par les dommages causés par l’industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires « fortement défectueux », tandis que l’analyse de DeSmog révèle l'absence de représentation de la société civile ou des communautés locales affectées par les dommages causés par l’industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.