DeSmog

Environmentalism: Corporate Style I

authordefault
on

Exhibitors at the Society of Environmental Journalists conference in Burlington, Vt., offer a broad and surprising view of what “environmentalism” can mean in different minds.

For example, who would have expected that the first thing you would see walking into the plenary session was an “environmentally friendly” SUV? Admittedly, it’s a hybrid, but you have to hand it to the U.S. automakers. Many people would have balked at the prospect of selling cars to environmentalists, especially the kind of cars that have come to epitomize unnecessary over consumption. Really, bravo!

Not to be outdone, you have the folks from RidgeProtectors, who are standing up for the rights of birds and bats to fly free of interference from wind farms. Aside from disrupting the landscape and creating irritating “shadow flicker,” the farms threaten to block access to some of the Northeast’s excellent bird-hunting habitat. (If we’re going to be killing birds, apparently we should be doing it purposefully, with guns, not inadvertently with a form of energy generation that generates no greenhouse gases.)

The conference also boasts exhibitors including the Competitive Enterprise Institute, still boldly proclaiming that CO2 is “life.” These people would stand on a melting ice floe and deny that the sun shines yellow.

More on this later.

Related Posts

on

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labour’s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labour’s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

Clintel’s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the group’s transatlantic ties.

Clintel’s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the group’s transatlantic ties.
on

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires « fortement défectueux », tandis que l’analyse de DeSmog révèle l'absence de représentation de la société civile ou des communautés locales affectées par les dommages causés par l’industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires « fortement défectueux », tandis que l’analyse de DeSmog révèle l'absence de représentation de la société civile ou des communautés locales affectées par les dommages causés par l’industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.