Lonely NRSP "experts" Shouting into the Wind

on

Here ‘s a bit of pathos, the lonely lament of a couple of public relations has-beens who can no longer get anyone (other than Financial Post Editor Terence Corcoran) to answer their phone calls.

The mournful victims here are Dr. Tim Ball and Tom Harris (right), the nominal brains behind the Natural Resources Stewardship Project (NRSP, or Not Really Science People). In this article, printed in the business pages of the National Post, Ball and Harris complain that, even among Canadian Conservatives, “open discussion of the vast uncertainties (my emphasis) in climate change science has been declared off-limits.” Which is to say, the Tories no longer invite industry-funded climate-change deniers like Tim Ball to their policy sessions. This change in Tory policy is particularly hurtful to Harris because he once worked as an assistant to the MP who is currently the Tory Environment Committee Chair, Bob Mills. While in the good old days, Harris could count on Mills to attack Kyoto and climate change science, Mills is now demanding that experts who appear before the Commons Environment committee actually have, well, expertise. (For a sense of the alternative, for the kind of people who Ball and Harris call “science realists,” look at our Denier of the Day section.)

This is incredibly promising on two counts. First, in the six or seven weeks since the old industry-backed denial group Friends of Science remade itself as the NRSP, this has been one of very few notices the group has earned in the mainstream media. It appears that only the wilfully blind (stand up Terence Corcoran) can still ignore the fact that NRSP is a public relations group bent on confusing people about climate change and not an “environmental organization.”

Second, it’s delightful to see the Conservatives treating climate change a little bit seriously. They have an unusual opportunity to take leadership on this issue. They have support in the oil capitals of the country (from Edmonton, Calgary and Fort McMurray to St. John’s and Fort St. John) and they are clearly coming to recognize that the Canadian people want action, not further denial and delay. The Tories have a unique chance to do the right thing – to create a climate change policy that is sensible, achievable and palatable in Alberta. They have a chance to preserve the environment even as they protect national unity.

It seems obvious that, if they do that, they will win back the support they have squandered in Eastern Canada – and especially in Quebec. If they don’t, they will find themselves further marginalized – like Tim Ball and Tom Harris – an Alberta party able only to sow resentment and bitterness when the new Liberal champion comes in to clean up their mess. Seems like a no brainer for any Conservative who hopes to retain power.

Related Posts

on

Leaders in the state’s environmental justice movement see signs their pressure is bringing accountability for both government and polluters.

Leaders in the state’s environmental justice movement see signs their pressure is bringing accountability for both government and polluters.
Opinion

This bold new mechanism is what’s needed to end fossil fuel-induced violence against women, natural resources, and the climate, argue two African peace activists.

This bold new mechanism is what’s needed to end fossil fuel-induced violence against women, natural resources, and the climate, argue two African peace activists.
on

Fossil fuel defendants in climate liability lawsuits keep losing in their bids to keep cases in federal courts.

Fossil fuel defendants in climate liability lawsuits keep losing in their bids to keep cases in federal courts.
on

Ohio’s “permissive” regulation of fracking waste injection wells threatens public health and the environment, a petition to the EPA says.

Ohio’s “permissive” regulation of fracking waste injection wells threatens public health and the environment, a petition to the EPA says.