DeSmog

Bush administration waffles over Arctic ice but science doesn't

authordefault
on

The Bush Administration may be unsure as to why Arctic ice is melting, but the scientific analysis in its proposal to designate polar bears as a threatened species is quite clear on theĀ matter.

As reported in The New York Times, Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne told reporters although his decision to seek protection for polar bears acknowledged the melting of the Arctic ice, his department was not taking a position on why the ice was melting or what to do aboutĀ it.

ā€œThat whole aspect of climate change is beyond the scope of the Endangered Species Act,ā€ heĀ said.

Scientific studies in the proposal itself, however, identified the cause as continued buildup of heat-trapping gases which, left unchecked, could create ice-free Arctic summers in as little as threeĀ decades.

The Interior Department has a year to gather and study comments on the proposed listing and make a final determination. It must also work out a recovery plan to control and reduce harmful impacts to the polar bears, usually by controlling activities that causeĀ harm.

It is unclear whether a recovery plan could avoid addressing the link between man-made greenhouse-gas emissions and the increase in Arctic temperatures, the TimesĀ said.

Related Posts

on

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.
on

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.