Climate Change Deniers Herald the Melt on Mars

authordefault
on

(Facetious) Congratulations to National Geographicย  for having turned up another apparently credible climate change denier tucked in a far corner of theย world.

Admittedly, NatGeo reports that Russian astronomer Habibullo Abdussamatov is โ€œcompletely at odds with the mainstream scientific opinionโ€ when he argues that a recent melting on Martian icecaps proves that global warming is caused by the sun’s rays. But Abdusssamatov gets the headline, while the overwhelming majority of credible astronomers are relegated to the second page of the NatGeo website.

It is yet another example of the media’s preoccupation with lonely (sometimes looney) voices. No wonder the public remains convinced that the scientific community is still locked in a legitimate debate over climate change. When a journalistic institution like National Geographic is this careless in presenting the science, how can casual observers hope to make informedย conclusions?

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Coal, oil and gas have been killing people for centuries. Weโ€™re still paying for it.

Coal, oil and gas have been killing people for centuries. Weโ€™re still paying for it.
on

Unsubstantiated allegations against top climate advocates part of campaign to โ€œdiscredit and defundโ€ civil society actors in EU, says transparency campaigner.

Unsubstantiated allegations against top climate advocates part of campaign to โ€œdiscredit and defundโ€ civil society actors in EU, says transparency campaigner.
Analysis
on

San Francisco-based developers launch publicity drive to soothe local concerns over giant project.

San Francisco-based developers launch publicity drive to soothe local concerns over giant project.
on

Farageโ€™s new directors reflect his anti-science views.

Farageโ€™s new directors reflect his anti-science views.