AutoLobby World Cup: European Union vs. United States

AutoLobby World Cup: European Union vs. United States
on

There are very large gaps between what the North American auto industry says it’s doing about climate change and what it’s actually doing about climate change.

Honda professes expertise in “Environmentology.” Ford Motor Company assures us that its “Easy to be green.” And GM touts the “Chevy Volt” as proof of their commitment to all things envirobnmentally friendly.

All this public “greening” is going on at the same time that these companies, along with pretty much every other major auto manufacturer in North America, are sponsoring lawsuits across the United States in an attempt to block stricter regulations on greenhouse gas emission standards for new vehicles.

In the State of California for example, automakers have successfully used the courts to delay new greenhouse gas emissions standards for more than 5 years now. And the delay continues with no foreseeable end despite rulings going all the way to the US Supreme Court.

Of course, in North America this type of corporate behavior isn’t surprising and, sadly, the public has all but given up on trying to separate the PR spin from the truth.

Given the fact that C02 emissions from cars and light-trucks account for about 20% of the United State’s total emissions, these actions by the autolobby should not be taken lightly.

But it seems that this auto industry greenwashing is not just a North American phenomenon. Like most international sports, the European autolobby have been greenwashing for a lot longer and have developed much more skill than their American counterparts.

And when it comes to percentage of overall emissions, the European auto sector has the US beat again, with the EU transportation sector accounting for more than 28% of total greenhouse gas emissions.

According to this report by the Corporate Europe Observatory, the EU autolobby has successfully delayed any new regulations on greenhouse gas emissions standards for vehicles since 1996!

No doubt, stats like this are the envy of the US counterparts.

To summarize 11 years of delay and obfuscation:

1996: EU agreed to reduce carbon emissions for passenger cars to 120g/km by 2010. The auto lobby and the European Commission agreed to voluntary standards with a midterm target of 140g/km by 2008.

2006: the European Commission announces in an annual report that the voluntary reductions are proceeding too slowly to meet the 2008 target. The Commission says it has ‘lost faith’ in voluntary standards and calls for binding legislation on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions of 120g/km to be met by 2012.

2006: Car lobby cries foul, saying that the current agreement runs until 2010, and that the Commission should wait until then before implementing any new emissions standards.

2006: DaimlerChrysler claims that any new mandatory regulations would result in “around 65,000 workers in the cities of Sindelfingen, Untertürkheim and Bremen would be hit [with job loss]”.

January, 2007: BMW, Volkswagen and DaimlerChrysler, together with the European units of Ford and General Motors send a letter to the Commission stating that, “the direct consequence would be the migration of a large number of jobs from the automobile manufacturers and the supplier industry”

February, 2007: The Commission proposes a compromise that will see a target of 130g/km. by 2012. The next day, the major lobbying arm of the European auto-lobby issues a statement that the proposal is “… arbitrary and too severe.”

Of course, by now, the auto-lobby has all but forgotten that they had agreed to reducing emissions even lower, (120g/km by 2010) in a shorter period of time under the original 1996 voluntary standard.

Told you they were good. And it doesn’t end there, the European autolobby is promising an even bigger and better campaign against the new proposed standards.

AutoLobby World Cup: European Union vs. United States

Kevin is a contributor and strategic adviser to DeSmogBlog.

He runs the digital marketing agency Spake Media House. Named a “Green Hero” by Rolling Stone Magazine and one of the “Top 50 Tweeters” on climate change and environment issues, Kevin has appeared in major news media outlets around the world for his work on digital campaigning.

Kevin has been involved in the public policy arena in both the United States and Canada for more than a decade. For five years he was the managing editor of DeSmogBlog.com. In this role, Kevin’s research into the “climate denial industry” and the right-wing think tank networks was featured in news media articles around the world. He is most well known for his ground-breaking research into David and Charles Koch’s massive financial investments in the Republican and tea party networks.

Kevin is the first person to be designated a “Certified Expert” on the political and community organizing platform NationBuilder.

Prior to DeSmogBlog, Kevin worked in various political and government roles. He was Senior Advisor to the Minister of State for Multiculturalism and a Special Assistant to the Minister of State for Asia Pacific, Foreign Affairs for the Government of Canada. Kevin also worked in various roles in the British Columbia provincial government in the Office of the Premier and the Ministry of Health.

In 2008 Kevin co-founded a groundbreaking new online election tool called Vote for Environment which was later nominated for a World Summit Award in recognition of the world’s best e-Content and innovative ICT applications.

Kevin moved to Washington, DC in 2010 where he worked for two years as the Director of Online Strategy for Greenpeace USA and has since returned to his hometown of Vancouver, Canada.

Related Posts

on

Leaders in the state’s environmental justice movement see signs their pressure is bringing accountability for both government and polluters.

Leaders in the state’s environmental justice movement see signs their pressure is bringing accountability for both government and polluters.
Opinion

This bold new mechanism is what’s needed to end fossil fuel-induced violence against women, natural resources, and the climate, argue two African peace activists.

This bold new mechanism is what’s needed to end fossil fuel-induced violence against women, natural resources, and the climate, argue two African peace activists.
on

Fossil fuel defendants in climate liability lawsuits keep losing in their bids to keep cases in federal courts.

Fossil fuel defendants in climate liability lawsuits keep losing in their bids to keep cases in federal courts.
on

Ohio’s “permissive” regulation of fracking waste injection wells threatens public health and the environment, a petition to the EPA says.

Ohio’s “permissive” regulation of fracking waste injection wells threatens public health and the environment, a petition to the EPA says.