A DeSmogBlog exclusive investigation into NASA's DSCOVR climate station

authordefault
on

Somewhere in Maryland is a metal box containing a fully completed climate spacecraft that could save theย world.

NASAโ€™s Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) cost over $100 million and was designed to measure the energy budget of our warming planet. Yet the spacecraft has remained in its box for the last five years and it looks like it is not going anywhere anytimeย soon.

NASA quietly cancelled the project altogether in January 2006 citing โ€œcompetingย prioritiesโ€.

What happened? How could the US government possibly justify killing DSCOVR given the importance of climate change and after over 90% of the project expenses had already been incurred? What role did petty partisan politics play in this? Did the oil lobby have any influence on thisย decision?

Over the next few months I am going to be digging into the history of DSCOVR, the reasons why it was cancelled, and why NASA refuses to release any internal documents on the decision to kill theย mission.

But first, some background on why DSCOVR is so important and why it is not your average climateย satellite.

In fact, DSCOVR is not a satellite at all. It was designed to be sent far beyond the orbit of Earth to a unique parking spot in space, four times as far away as the moon. This โ€œL1 Lagrangian pointโ€ was to be DSCOVRโ€™s home, a gravity-neutral point between our planet and the Sun. If a spacecraft is put there, it stays put, 1.5 million kilometers away tracking the exact orbit of our planet around theย Sun.

From this unique vantage, the scientific instruments on DSCOVR would gaze back towards Earth, allowing us for the first time ever to measure the energy budget of the entire plant. This critical data would help calibrate climate models as well as measurements from other climate spacecraft that have collectively cost hundreds of millions ofย dollars.

The Earthโ€™s temperature is a delicate balance between the amount of energy retained by the atmosphere and the amount being reflected back into space. This second number is called โ€œalbedoโ€ and it is vitally important to scientists trying to develop reliable computer models on our changing climate. DSCOVR would provide vastly improved measurements of the Earthโ€™s albedo because from L1, it would be able to continuously observe the entire sunlit disc of ourย planet.

Interestingly, a common complaint of climate change deniers has been that the satellite data used to develop climate models is unreliable. DSCOVR would go a long way to settling whatever honest debate remained about the reliability of thoseย models.

Considering that these climate models are now driving enormous public policy decisions, one would think that DSCOVR would be a top priority. It certainly has been a priority of other governments. The French were so alarmed by the foot dragging by NASA they offered to send DSCOVR into space themselves at a greatly reduced cost. The Ukranian government even offered to launch DSCOVR for free aboard a Tsyklon IV rocket โ€“ the most reliable launch vehicle in theย world.

The response from NASA? Noย thanks.

Something seems rotten in the state ofย Maryland.

Next posting: how this mission, originally inspired by Al Gore, may have become fatally mired in beltway politics.

Click here to donate to our research project and help find out who killed the DSCOVR project.

Note: the DeSmogBlog team welcomes writer and researcher Mitchell Anderson to the team. Over the next few months Mitchell will be writing an investigative series on the US administration’s mothballing of the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR).

ย 

Related Posts

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.