Proud to be Canadian: NOT!

authordefault
on

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking today at the close of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Sydney, said, โ€œIโ€™m also very pleased that the Sydney Declaration mirrors the Canadian climate change approach on manyย levels.โ€

By which he clearly meant: We’re not planning to do anything about it,ย either.

Canada’s performance on this file has been – and continues to be – an international embarrassment, a mix of inaction andย deception.

Harper’s predecessor governments, in the hands of Liberal Prime Ministers Jean Chretien and Paul Martin, helped negotiate and then signed on to the Kyoto accord without making a single convincing policy gesture toward meeting the attendant emission reduction targets. Martin was even rude enough to lecture U.S. President George Bush for his failure to support Kyoto, even as the U.S. was outperforming Canada in slowing its rate of CO2ย emission.ย 

Prime Minister Harper, who in the Liberal days denied that global warming was even a problem, now claims that his government is taking the issue seriously, but is โ€œbalancing environmental protection and economic growth.โ€ His idea of balance is to allow Canada’s biggest and fastest growing emitter – the oil producers working the Alberta’s tar sands – a blanket exemption to any (even voluntary) emission reductionย targets.

The most charitable interpretation of the Harper government’s position on this file is that it reflects a certain cognitive dissonance, the โ€œuncomfortable tension that may result from having two conflicting thoughts at the same time, or from engaging in behavior that conflicts with one’sย belief.โ€

The least charitable is that Harper is a leading participant in an oil-sponsored international effort to prevent immediate action against an urgent global environmental threat – i.e., that he is lying through hisย ย teeth.

I would prefer to think that my Prime Minister is dilusional rather than dishonest, but woefully in the current circumstances, it amounts to the same thing.ย ย 

Related Posts

on

Meet those aiming to capitalize on Trump's re-election by slashing climate action, from Koch network fixtures to Project 2025 and beyond.

Meet those aiming to capitalize on Trump's re-election by slashing climate action, from Koch network fixtures to Project 2025 and beyond.
on

The elite agency has been going all out to win positive press for the hosts of the UN climate talks.

The elite agency has been going all out to win positive press for the hosts of the UN climate talks.
on

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.

One of the sponsors of the UK pavilion has worked with major polluters to help them extract more oil and gas.
on

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.

The Heritage Foundationโ€™s Project 2025 blueprint proposes sweeping anti-climate policies.