Proud to be Canadian: NOT!

authordefault
on

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, speaking today at the close of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation meeting in Sydney, said, “I’m also very pleased that the Sydney Declaration mirrors the Canadian climate change approach on many levels.”

By which he clearly meant: We’re not planning to do anything about it, either.

Canada’s performance on this file has been – and continues to be – an international embarrassment, a mix of inaction and deception.

Harper’s predecessor governments, in the hands of Liberal Prime Ministers Jean Chretien and Paul Martin, helped negotiate and then signed on to the Kyoto accord without making a single convincing policy gesture toward meeting the attendant emission reduction targets. Martin was even rude enough to lecture U.S. President George Bush for his failure to support Kyoto, even as the U.S. was outperforming Canada in slowing its rate of CO2 emission. 

Prime Minister Harper, who in the Liberal days denied that global warming was even a problem, now claims that his government is taking the issue seriously, but is “balancing environmental protection and economic growth.” His idea of balance is to allow Canada’s biggest and fastest growing emitter – the oil producers working the Alberta’s tar sands – a blanket exemption to any (even voluntary) emission reduction targets.

The most charitable interpretation of the Harper government’s position on this file is that it reflects a certain cognitive dissonance, the “uncomfortable tension that may result from having two conflicting thoughts at the same time, or from engaging in behavior that conflicts with one’s belief.”

The least charitable is that Harper is a leading participant in an oil-sponsored international effort to prevent immediate action against an urgent global environmental threat – i.e., that he is lying through his  teeth.

I would prefer to think that my Prime Minister is dilusional rather than dishonest, but woefully in the current circumstances, it amounts to the same thing.  

Related Posts

on

The technology could provide cover for fossil fuel companies to explore more oil and gas drilling, campaigners say.

The technology could provide cover for fossil fuel companies to explore more oil and gas drilling, campaigners say.
on

Activists hope that more and bigger court wins will break the "grinding gridlock" on policies to end use of fossil fuels.

Activists hope that more and bigger court wins will break the "grinding gridlock" on policies to end use of fossil fuels.
on

Several major newspapers have amplified a new report on the cost of net zero that contains significant inaccuracies.

Several major newspapers have amplified a new report on the cost of net zero that contains significant inaccuracies.
on

A UN expert calls for ending confidential arbitration agreements in development and trade treaties, which are forcing nations to roll back climate, enviro, human rights protections while owing fossil fuel companies billions in damages.

A UN expert calls for ending confidential arbitration agreements in development and trade treaties, which are forcing nations to roll back climate, enviro, human rights protections while owing fossil fuel companies billions in damages.