Research: The New Economics of Global Warming

picture-431-1407968445.jpg
onDec 13, 2007 @ 21:14 PST

Economists no longer debate the realities of anthropomorphic climate changeโ€“that’s soย 1993!

Instead, they squabble over how much we should be spending today to lessen the sting of the much bigger invoices that will inevitably come due tomorrow, should we insist on carrying on with all this fossil-fuel nonsense.

To do their apocalyptic calculus, they attach hardโ€“and rather largeโ€“numbers to phenomena such as rainforest loss, and plug them into cost-benefit analysis models. In the end, the bean counters determine a so-called social cost of carbon, and recommend a percentage of GDP for present-day investments in clean-energy research and the like.

Until now, the economic models have not included โ€œunlikely but extreme events,โ€ such as a global temperature rise ofโ€“gulp!โ€“six degrees, mostly because Sir Nicholas Stern and friends have dismissed them as simply too remote a possibility to justify making significant present-day investments.

Not anyย more.

New Scientist magazine (article firewalled) reveals this month that Harvard University economics professor Martin Weitzman has developed the first thorough method for including such unlikely but extreme events in cost-benefitย analyses.

His paper isn’t even out yet, but word of his results is spreading like pine beetle through the economics community:

โ€œWhen you take into account extreme temperature risesโ€ฆ [Weitzman] says, they dominate all other options and effectively demand that investment aimed at stopping them be made nowโ€

Even Richard Tol is lining up behind Weitzman’sย findings.

The Irish economist, who had, in the opinion of many, long low-balled the amount that should be spent to prevent the release of one tonne of CO2, dramatically adjusted his math. Before reading Weitzman’s paper, New Scientist reports, Tol had priced carbon at $5 a tonne. Now, he thinks it should be closer to $50. โ€œThis work shows we’re simply doing it wrong,โ€ the impressively-coiffed Dubliner tells the magazine.

No kidding.

Note: see our welcome to DeSmog’s latest writer James Glave – this is his first post so beย gentle!

If you enjoyed this post, please vote for it here on Digg.com. ย 

picture-431-1407968445.jpg
I work with Clean Energy Canada at Tides Canada to help accelerate Canadaโ€™s transition to an energy-efficient, ecologically responsible, and prosperous low-carbonย economy.

Related Posts

onNov 14, 2025 @ 07:04 PST

Their access to the summit is proof that Big Oil still holds "a dangerous sway" over the climate process, campaigners say.

Their access to the summit is proof that Big Oil still holds "a dangerous sway" over the climate process, campaigners say.
onNov 13, 2025 @ 21:01 PST

Delegationโ€™s composition consistent with new KBPO report revealingย this yearโ€™s UN climate talks have the largest number of fossil fuel lobbyists to date

Delegationโ€™s composition consistent with new KBPO report revealingย this yearโ€™s UN climate talks have the largest number of fossil fuel lobbyists to date
onNov 13, 2025 @ 06:22 PST

Labour government accused of being โ€œcomplicit in the fossil fuel industryโ€™s conquest of the COP processโ€.

Labour government accused of being โ€œcomplicit in the fossil fuel industryโ€™s conquest of the COP processโ€.
Analysis
onNov 12, 2025 @ 12:15 PST

Our changing climate will produce winners and losers. Canada should look to the Global South for a winning strategy.

Our changing climate will produce winners and losers. Canada should look to the Global South for a winning strategy.