Biofuels, once the 'silver bullet' of global warming, are causing more emissions than fossil fuels

authordefault
on

Two comprehensive studies in Science magazine have concluded nearly all biofuels used today trigger more greenhouse emissions than conventional fuels if the emission costs of producing these so-called โ€œgreenโ€ fuels areย calculated.

The studies take the first detailed look at the impact on emissions of converting natural land to cropland around the globe to support biofuels development โ€“ dashing hopes for the once-popular alternative energyย source.

Destruction of natural ecosystems to produce biofuels not only releases greenhouse gases through burning and plowing but also deprives the planet of natural sponges to absorb carbon emissions, the Science studiesย concluded.

Cropland absorbs far less carbon than the rain forests or scrubland it replaces, and production of all biofuels has resulted, directly or indirectly, intentionally or not, in new lands being cleared, either for food orย fuel.

โ€œWhen you take this into account, most of the biofuel people are using or planning to use would increase greenhouse gasses substantially,โ€ said Timothy Searchinger, lead author of one of the studies and a researcher in environment and economics at Princeton University. โ€œPreviously thereโ€™s been an accounting error: land use change has been left out of priorย analysis.โ€

Plant-based fuels were considered better than fossil fuels because carbon released from burning was balanced by carbon absorbed when the plants grew. But that equation overlooked the fact turning plants into fuels causes its own emissions โ€” for refining and transport, forย example.

Grassland clearance releases 93 times the greenhouse gas that would be saved by the fuel made annually on that land, said Joseph Fargione, lead author of the second paper, and a scientist at the Nature Conservancy. โ€œSo for the next 93 years youโ€™re making climate change worse, just at the time when we need to be bringing down carbonย emissions.โ€

The European Union has tried to address the land-use issue with proposals stipulating that imported biofuels cannot come from land that was previously rain forest. But even with such restrictions, Searchingerโ€™s study shows, the purchase of biofuels in Europe and the U.S. leads to destruction of natural habitats farย afield.

โ€œThis land-use problem is not just a secondary effect โ€” it was often just a footnote in prior papers,โ€ he said. โ€œIt is major. The comparison with fossil fuels is going to be adverse for virtually all biofuels onย cropland.โ€

So the stakes in the climate-change struggle just gotย raised.

Related Posts

on

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.

The new leader of the opposition has regularly criticised the UKโ€™s green ambitions.
on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.