Big Government: Darn Handy in a Crisis

authordefault
on

Slavish devotees to the free market must be mourning the news today as the U.S. government steps in to rescue the insurance giant AIG and (we’re still hoping) to forestall a worldwide financialย crisis.

This is what government does: it saves us from ourselves and from disasters we cannot anticipate. Good governments try to get ahead of that curve, setting policies and regulations that prevent totally stupid or predictable crises. I think its fair to say that this event suggests that good government has, recently, been in shortย supply.

Consider two obvious cases that we have before us: the financial meltdown and the global climateย meltdown.

In the first case, you have a situation in which some clever (?!) souls gathered together to celebrate the overheated U.S. housing market by lending money to people who couldn’t afford it, at interest rates that were destined to push the borrowers further and further into debt. These financial brainiacs then โ€œsecuritizedโ€ the risk, selling all this (inevitably bad) debt to unsophisticated investors (Lehman Bros., Bear Stearns,ย etc.).

A reasonable argument can be made that this was predictable trouble – that a slightly more interventionist government could have prevented this crisis by noting that the underlying activity was rooted in greed rather than goodย judgment.

Now take the case of Exxon Mobil, the richest company in the history of companies and an organization that is reliant on a single, finite commodity. Irrespective that this commodity is in diminishing supply, and that its increasing use is threatening the habitability of the planet, Exxon has chosen to forsake all investment in energy alternatives – banking instead on its ability to convince gullible legislators and shortsighted people that the climate crisis might not beย happening.

Now, aside from small town mayors in Alaska and U.S. Vice Presidential candidates, few people actually believe this, but the temptation to keep on making money is hard to pass up when your investments are doing poorly and the kids still needย braces.

This, then, would be a perfect, and perfectly appropriate time for government to step in. This might be a time, for example, for responsible legislators to notice that during the period between 1972 and 2006, nearly 71 per cent of Americans thought government should be forcing automakers to make cars and trucks that use less gasoline. And during this same period, government did virtually nothing, while America’s automotive free marketeers built bigger and bigger gas guzzlers that made climate change worse and put the country at greater risk because of its dependency on foreignย oil.

Those car makers are now in crisis – slammed by a free market that allows smart consumers to buy Toyotas that are good on gas. And that puts American jobs and families at risk, both now, and in the future, when other jurisdictions will continue to outperform U.S. industry because they have been thinkingย ahead.

I’d like to think that foresight is also possible in the offices of Ford and Exxon Mobil – the lack of evidence notwithstanding. But for today, I’m left thinking that Churchill’s withering criticism of democracy is equally applicable to the system of free markets: it is the worst imaginable – except for all theย others.

I would not abandon free markets any sooner than Churchill would have foresaken democracy, but we should keep our heads, recognize that both systems are fallible and allow the strengths of one to support the weaknesses of theย other.

Editor’s note: the Progress Report has a very good article on this subject as well.ย 

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The province released new burdensome reclamation requirements for wind and solar projects โ€” the latest performance in an elaborate political troll.

The province released new burdensome reclamation requirements for wind and solar projects โ€” the latest performance in an elaborate political troll.
on

The government has been accused of making a โ€œsecret exchange dealโ€ with fossil fuel firms to compensate for the tax hike.

The government has been accused of making a โ€œsecret exchange dealโ€ with fossil fuel firms to compensate for the tax hike.
Analysis
on

A third of energy communities receiving subsidies from the Spanish government are managed by subsidiaries of oil giant Repsol, DeSmog review of official data finds.

A third of energy communities receiving subsidies from the Spanish government are managed by subsidiaries of oil giant Repsol, DeSmog review of official data finds.
Analysis
on

The 26 percent reduction the Alberta government recently bragged about happened almost entirely between 2012 and 2016.

The 26 percent reduction the Alberta government recently bragged about happened almost entirely between 2012 and 2016.