EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

As wildfires rage across the country, Cheryl Gallant continues to spread climate misinformation after a CSIS report said her conspiracy theories could increase the โ€œthreat of serious violenceโ€.

As wildfires rage across the country, Cheryl Gallant continues to spread climate misinformation after a CSIS report said her conspiracy theories could increase the โ€œthreat of serious violenceโ€.
on

The Clacton MP has received a platform from a network of MAGA groups that have pushed the presidentโ€™s agenda in the UK and beyond.

The Clacton MP has received a platform from a network of MAGA groups that have pushed the presidentโ€™s agenda in the UK and beyond.
Series: MAGA
on

Trumpโ€™s commerce chief has been promoting the business interests of Farageโ€™s main donor.

Trumpโ€™s commerce chief has been promoting the business interests of Farageโ€™s main donor.
on

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.

Nigel Farageโ€™s party has a long history of rejecting basic climate science.