EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


Related Posts

on

Research finds signs of โ€œcoordinated climate obstruction effortsโ€ among oil, plastics, and agrichemical industries in social media messaging.

Research finds signs of โ€œcoordinated climate obstruction effortsโ€ among oil, plastics, and agrichemical industries in social media messaging.
on

The Reform UK leader is betting his home on climate denial, campaigners say.

The Reform UK leader is betting his home on climate denial, campaigners say.
Analysis
on

Badenoch, a self-described โ€˜net zero skeptic,โ€™ called Poilievre โ€˜a new friend and allyโ€™ in December.

Badenoch, a self-described โ€˜net zero skeptic,โ€™ called Poilievre โ€˜a new friend and allyโ€™ in December.
on

Claire Coutinho endorsed several figures linked to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a group that questions established climate science.

Claire Coutinho endorsed several figures linked to the Global Warming Policy Foundation, a group that questions established climate science.