EPA to Planet: "Drop Dead! (You, too, Supreme Court!)

authordefault
on

The Environmental Protection Agency ruledย  that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmental groups. The ruling turns on a seemingly arcane regulatory question that could govern the future of new fossil fuel-burning buildings and power plants under the Clean Air Act.

During the Bush administration, the EPA has rejected the idea that greenhouse gases should be regulated like soot, smog precursors and other kinds of air pollution, despite an April 2007 Supreme Court ruling that said carbon dioxide fit the definition of a pollutant that could be regulated under the Clean Airย Act.


authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

The would-be mayor has claimed that carbon dioxide โ€œis not pollutionโ€.

The would-be mayor has claimed that carbon dioxide โ€œis not pollutionโ€.
on

Concerns have been raised about the channelโ€™s โ€œwild and paranoid conspiracy claimsโ€ ahead of Mayโ€™s local elections.

Concerns have been raised about the channelโ€™s โ€œwild and paranoid conspiracy claimsโ€ ahead of Mayโ€™s local elections.
on

Former Canadian Gas Association lobbyist part of Poilievreโ€™s inner circle.

Former Canadian Gas Association lobbyist part of Poilievreโ€™s inner circle.
on

Reform UK treasurer Nick Candy has been attempting to extract cash from fossil fuel executives.

Reform UK treasurer Nick Candy has been attempting to extract cash from fossil fuel executives.