Lorne Gunter: Enlisting "science" to help me believe what I want

authordefault
on

The denier web has been alive with excitement over the past week about a presentation by the German meteorologist Dr. Mojib Latif, who told a recent scientific meeting in Geneva that he expects a temporary lull in globalย warming.

One of the National Postโ€™s most vigorous climate change deniers, Lorne Gunter, grabbed onto this story in a celebratory column titled: Global Warming Takes a Break. But Gunter has not suddenly decided to take science seriously. He dismissed as somehow unknowable Latifโ€™s ultimate conclusion: that climate change is a real and pressing problem and that even if global temperature increases stall, they will inevitablyย resume.

Nope. Gunter doesnโ€™t want to listen to a whole scientific sentence: but heโ€™s willing to bet our lives on aย  fragment that bolsters his ownย agenda.

Actually, on the question of betting, this isnโ€™t the first time that Latif has suggested that a change in the ocean currents in the North Atlantic may cause a short-term global cooling. He made a similar argument last year as one of the authors of a letter to the prestigious journal Nature. At that time, the scientists at RealClimate.org responded by first questioning Latifโ€™s conviction and then testing the strength of that conviction with the offer of a small wager (at first โ‚ฌ2500 and finally, any bet of the Nature authorsโ€™ choosing). Not surprisingly, there were no takers. Latif and company have a tidy little experiment, demonstrating the potential for a short-term lull in warming, but they arenโ€™t prepared to bet on itsย accuracy.

Not to be outdone in the campaign to muddy the waters, the thin-skinned Anthony Watts at WattsUpWithThat.com, found a way to connect the Latif paper with the work of another quibbler, the astrophysicist Henrik Svensmark. Svensmark has long suffered under the weight of that chip on his shoulder: he seems to think that climate scientists donโ€™t take his work seriously enough and that scientific funders favour atmospheric physicists, shortchanging scientists who want to blame as much as possible on the activities of theย sun.

There is, however, no reason to dismiss ether Latif or Svensmark. Ocean currents and solar flares will continue to affect the global climate. So will volcanoes, meteors and other often unpredictable inputs. But that doesnโ€™t change the underlying problem of anthropogenic climate change. Humans are digging carbon out of the ground and setting it on fire, dangerously changing the chemistry of the atmosphere and contributing to the earthโ€™s capacity to trapย heat.

Svensmark wouldnโ€™t deny it. Latif has pointed specifically to the risk. In light of that, how on earth could anyone take Lorne Gunter even a tiny bitย seriously?

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

His push for more gas development alarms climate change experts amid growing evidence of declining global LNG demand.

His push for more gas development alarms climate change experts amid growing evidence of declining global LNG demand.
on

A pro-Trump, pro-oil oligarchy is being convened by a group backed by the owners of GB News, campaigners say.

A pro-Trump, pro-oil oligarchy is being convened by a group backed by the owners of GB News, campaigners say.
on

Office of Management and Budget General Counsel Mark Paoletta reportedly drafted the memo that took aim at the โ€œgreen new dealโ€ but caused widespread upheaval.

Office of Management and Budget General Counsel Mark Paoletta reportedly drafted the memo that took aim at the โ€œgreen new dealโ€ but caused widespread upheaval.
Analysis
on

Understanding how autocrats and oligarchs capture and consolidate state power.

Understanding how autocrats and oligarchs capture and consolidate state power.