Nature Weighs in on Email Controversy

authordefault
on

The journal Nature, unquestionably one of the most credible sources in science today, weighed in yesterday with an editorial on the hacked email controversy. Itโ€™sย conclusion:

โ€œIn the end, what the UEA (University of East Anglia) e-mails really show is that scientists are human beings โ€” and that unrelenting opposition to their work can goad them to the limits of tolerance, and tempt them to act in ways that undermine scientific values. Yet it is precisely in such circumstances that researchers should strive to act and communicate professionally, and make their data and methods available to others, lest they provide their worst critics with ammunition. After all, the pressures the UEA e-mailers experienced may be nothing compared with what will emerge as the United States debates a climate bill next year, and denialists use every means at their disposal to undermine trust in scientists andย science.โ€

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

on

Pathways Allianceย presence was minimal, indicating potential retooling for well-advertised CCS project.

Pathways Allianceย presence was minimal, indicating potential retooling for well-advertised CCS project.
on

How Italian activists are fighting to expose the true scale of the climate harm caused by a giant European pipeline.

How Italian activists are fighting to expose the true scale of the climate harm caused by a giant European pipeline.
on

A media CEO who helped to stage an event with Reformโ€™s main U.S. ally has publicly denounced the partyโ€™s leader.

A media CEO who helped to stage an event with Reformโ€™s main U.S. ally has publicly denounced the partyโ€™s leader.
on

Opaque funds are masking donations to political causes.

Opaque funds are masking donations to political causes.