2010 In Review: Scientists and Journalists Take Stock and Share Lessons Learned

authordefault
on

Thereโ€™s no doubt about it. Itโ€™s been a challenging year for climate science and climate scientists, for journalists, and for the public. A string of legislative and regulatory disappointments coupled with dizzying political spin have left many more confused than everย about theย overwhelming scientific consensusย of climateย change.ย 

Itโ€™s been a particularly grim year following theย Citizens Unitedย decisionย that ushered in a new era of rampant electoral spending on climate change denial; the U.S. midterm elections produced a Senate filled with climate change skeptics and deniers; aย failed climate billย orย two, and after theย Copenhagen talksย failed to produce any real results. ย In addition, many pundits and analysts are giving us good reason to believe the U.S. wonโ€™t see a climate bill forย two years, and little reason to believe that real climate progress will be made inย Cancun next week. It seems thereโ€™s a lot of reason to feel distressed.ย ย 

Last week marked a year since the so-calledย Climategateย โ€œscandalโ€ sent climate change deniers into anย echo chamber frenzy.ย ย Bud Ward and John Wihbey aptly note that to even call itย โ€œclimategateโ€ lends it credence that is undeserved. ย Yet it is imperative that we try to learn lessons from it. ย ย This certainly wonโ€™t be the last difficult year for the climate change movement; an increasingly challenging political environment promises more interesting times ahead, both for the science and for the scientists who devote their lives to the subject. ย In a nutshell, weโ€™ve got our work cut out for us.

In this great two part series from theย Yale Forum on Climate Change and the Media, Ward and Wihbey explore what climate scientists have learned in the last year, and share what the reporters whose responsibility it is to share and help evaluate their findings haveย learned.ย 

Peter H. Gleik of theย Pacific Instituteย writes,

โ€ฆthere is an improved realization of how impossible it is to keep the climate science questions and debates separate from the political and ideological debates. And I hope weโ€™ve learned the importance of communicating accurately and constantly. Being passive in the face of political repression, ideological misuse of science, and policy ignorance moves us in the wrong direction. I would like to think the community has learned that depending on the โ€œhonestyโ€ and โ€œimpartialityโ€ of journalism is not enough โ€ฆ that without strong input from climate scientists, the wrong stories get reported, with bad information, and ideologicalย bias.

Similarly, Andrew Revkinย writes,ย 

If science media tried to sustain coverage of science (including climate science) as a process, including the ugly parts, the public might be less apt to be surprised by occasional revelations of conflict like those illuminated through the batch of hacked/liberated (pick your adjective depending on your worldview) e-mails andย files.

Beware the lure of the front-page thought in gauging developments in complicated science pointing to a rising human influence on climate, lest you end up giving readers whiplash. Try rigorously to include context on the overall state of knowledge when framing stories on science around conflict, given that conflict is a constant inย science.

Develop patience. The story of humanityโ€™s entwined climate and energy challenges will outlive you. No single treaty, meeting, e-mail hack, IPCC report, or climate bill is aย keystone.

Read on about climate scientistsโ€™ and journalists inspiring and thoughtful lessons and ruminations on the โ€˜climateโ€™ of climate change in the last year at the Yale Forum on Climate Change and the Media (Part IPart II).ย 

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Concerned Canadians should take note of all the Conservative leaderโ€™s MAGA endorsements and vote accordingly.

Concerned Canadians should take note of all the Conservative leaderโ€™s MAGA endorsements and vote accordingly.
on

American owner Nikola has filed for bankruptcy less than a year after the fueller was installed. Canada's Hydrogen Convention began Tuesday.

American owner Nikola has filed for bankruptcy less than a year after the fueller was installed. Canada's Hydrogen Convention began Tuesday.
on

Warren Stephens made the donation alongside big tech firms and oil giants.

Warren Stephens made the donation alongside big tech firms and oil giants.
on

With a federal election looming, reps from Amazon and TC Energy discuss how a new Pierre Poilievre government could slash bureaucracy โ€˜more quicklyโ€™ than Trump.

With a federal election looming, reps from Amazon and TC Energy discuss how a new Pierre Poilievre government could slash bureaucracy โ€˜more quicklyโ€™ than Trump.