Science article recognizes John Mashey

authordefault
on

Updated: With complete list of Masheyย Papers

Computer scientist, entrepreneur, periodic DeSmogBlog contributor and โ€œone of the good guysโ€ John Mashey is the subject of an extremely favorable profile this week in Science.ย 

Science writer Eli Kintisch looks back over the last couple of years at the research and reports that Mashey has produced. Calling Mashey โ€œan amateurโ€ (which, on the question of climate science, he freely admits to being), Kintisch then looks for some journalistic โ€œbalance,โ€ interviewing one person who is defensive and critical in the face of Mashey’s work (the confused and compromised physicist Will Happer) and one who is reassured and delighted (โ€œhockey stickโ€ co-author and director of the Earth System Science Center at Penn State,ย Michael Mann).

โ€œBoth sides can agree on one thing, however: Mashey has become one of the most visible of a new generation of climate warriors.โ€Kintisch canvases the reason that Mashey got involved in the first place – why he spends his retirement from designing computer systems by feverishly documenting โ€œclimateย anti-science.โ€

โ€œMashey became upset that they (friends in the climate science community) were being attacked by bloggers and lawmakers and subjected to anonymous threats. ‘(Science historian) Naomi (Oreskes) is a friend, and she gets death threats. Mike Mannโ€™s a friend, and he gets death threats. It pisses me off,’ Mashey says. ‘They get harassed and discouraged for doing a good job for everybodyโ€™sย grandchildren.’โ€

So, with a computer programer’s zest for detail, Mashey wades through the flawed and contradictory material that constitutes the attack on climate science, producing voluminous and carefully credited reports that, in at least one recent case, result in the embarrassment of warriors on the other side of the argument and in a restoration of accuracy in the publishedย record.

The Science articleย concludes:

โ€œMashey believes that vanquishing scientistsโ€™ foes will serve a higher purpose. ‘Itโ€™s up to some of the rest of us to help get these guys off your backs so you can do the science,’ he tells his scientist allies. He thinks discrediting their opponents also allows society to focus on the biggest problem: the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ‘Goal number two is, try to help lessen the impact of climate antiscience on public policy before it commits the U.S. to be an increasingly bad place to live,’ heย says.โ€

The Masheyย Papers

1) Another Attack on Global Warmingโ€™s Scientific Consensus โ€“ A Case Study of Personal Harassment and Amplification of Nonsense by the Denialist PR Machine, DeSmogBlog, March 23, 2008, 40p.

2) Science Bypass โ€“ Anti-science Petition to APS from folks with SEPP, George C. Marshall Institute, Heartland, DeSmogBlog, Nov. 11, 2009, 128p.

3) Crescendo to Climategate Cacophony – Behind the 2006 Wegman Report and Two Decades of Climate Anti-Science, DeSmogBlog, March 15, 2010, 185p. (CCC)

4) Strange Scholarship in the Wegman Report – A Faรงade for the Climate Anti-Science PR Campaign, DeepClimate, Sept. 26, 2010, 250p. (SSWR)

5) โ€œStrange Inquiries at George Mason University โ€ฆand even stranger comments, DeSmnogBlog, Jan. 04, 2011, 45p.ย  (SIGMU)

6) Strange Tales and Emails: Said, Wegman, Sharabati, Rigsby (2008), DeSmogBlog,ย  May 26, 2011, 17p.ย  STaE.

7) Strange Falsifications in the Wegman Report, DeSmogBlog, May 27, 2011, 12p.ย  SFWR

PRESENTATION AND VIDEO

The Machinery of Climate Anti-Science, April 7, 2011, University of Victoria, B.C., Canada.

ย 

Related Posts

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.