NCC: Not Much Blood on Canada's Hands!

authordefault
on

It’s Christmastime in Canada – when all self-satisfied ideologues take a moment to lift the finger of blame and point it at somebodyย else.

โ€œCreditโ€ for outstanding performance in this regard must go to National Citizens Coalition President andf CEO Peter Coleman. In ringing defence of the former NCC president (and now Canadian Prime Minister) Stephen Harper, Coleman offers a cheery Christmas message that celebrates Canada’s reneging on its legal commitment to the Kyoto Accord and dodges Canadian responsibility for contributing to the climateย crisis.

Specifically, Coleman talks about appearing before a group of University of Windsor law students, who asked him aboutย Kyoto:

When I responded that Canada emits 2% of the world’s greenhouse gases they were surprised to hear that it is that low. When I told them that Alberta’s oil sands contribute just 5% of Canada’s total greenhouse gas emissions they were again surprised as they expected it would be a lotย more.

Coleman is actually wrong on the numbers. The latest tally (2008) puts Canada’s GHG emissions at โ€œonlyโ€ 1.8 per cent, which is swell as long as you don’t think about Canada’s population amounting to just 0.004 per cent of the world’s total. That makes Canada the fourth worst polluter per capita. It also makes our 34 million inhabitants the seventh largest source of CO2 among all the countries in the world – that’s seventh from a list of 216 countries andย jurisdictions.

And what of the tar sands supposedly tiny contribution? If it was a country, the tar sands 0.09 per cent share of global GHG emissions would put it in a tie with Ecuador in 76th place. The tar sands alone emit more CO2 than the bottom 60 countries and jurisdictions COMBINED. Canada as a country produces more than the bottom 135 countries –ย combined.

This somehow makes Coleman proud. It gives him courage to deride China, which โ€œgets a free pass even though they contribute over 20 per cent of the world’s greenhouse gases.โ€ Yes, and that at a rate of less than half of Canada’s on a per capita basis – and despite the amount of CO2 that is derived from the production of goods that are, in fact, consumed inย Canada.

Coleman makes one point worth acknowledging: he criticizes the Liberal government of Jean Chretien for having signed the Kyoto Accord without making any attempt to comply with it. Too right. Canada’s humiliation began under the Chretien Liberals, but it took the self-righteous determination of the Harper Conservatives to make itย complete.

It remains a mystery, however, as to why this should leave Peter Coleman feelingย smug.

Related Posts

on

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.

The conference has played host to Nigel Farage, Kemi Badenoch, and an array of MAGA figures this week.
on

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.

Chris Wright, a former oil and gas executive, urged the UK to embrace fossil fuels at right-wing Alliance for Responsible Citizenship conference in London.
on

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.

The addition of the Canadian Natural Resources Limited director expands fossil fuel representation on the board overseeing nearly $800 billion in retirement savings, as CPPIB faces scrutiny over its climate strategy.
on

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.

Many Cannes Lions award winners have claimed credit for field work they didnโ€™t do, positive impacts that canโ€™t be confirmed, or campaigns that barely existed.