DeSmog

Why Is Pfizer Still Aligning Itself With Heartland Institute On "Public Health" Record?

authordefault
on

The Heartland Institute has had a rough time the last couple of months. The climate denial shop has endured the release of embarrassing leaked documents. Then it launched a devastatingly ill-conceivedĀ billboard campaign associating climate science adherents with serial killers. That didn’t work out so well. So Heartland’s donors started pulling out. Its annual Denial-a-palooza festival was put out to pasture.

Despite the exodus of support for Heartland’s extremist views, one major health care company remains a financial supporter of the HeartlandĀ Institute.

Pfizer, a major pharmaceutical company, continues to support Heartland, although its competitors, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Eli Lily, have already pulled out. Now Forecast the Facts is issuing a call to medical professionals to sign a letter urging Pfizer to dissolve its relationship withĀ Heartland.

According to Pfizer, while the company has publicly stated it disagrees with Heartland on its stance on climate, it still supports Heartland’s record on healthĀ care.

Here’s why that’sĀ ironic.

It’s quite clear that there’s a link between the pollution that causes climate change and the pollution that causes health problems, specifically in the lungs. The emissions that come from sources like coal plants not only produce carbon pollution but also produce the particulates and toxics that infiltrate airways and cause respiratory problems andĀ death.

Can you think of another pollution source that’s bad for your health and damages your lungs?Ā Cigarettes.

Some of the medications Pfizer produces include tiotropium and varenecline. You may better know those as Spiriva and Chantix, pills that treat COPD (a major respiratory disease) and help stop tobacco/nicotene addiction,Ā respectively.

Heartland is a staunch defender of cigarette smokers’ rights. Not only do they advocate against smoking bans and lower taxes for cigarettes (which, according to them, impinge on citizens’ freedoms and private property rights), but also flat out deride the well-documented health risks associated with smoking and second-hand smoke.

Apparently they like pollution across the board- whether it’s polluting the atmosphere or yourĀ lungs.

Here’s an excerpt from their webpage entitled, ā€œThe Smoker’s Loungeā€, written by Heartland President, JoeĀ Bast:

ā€œThe public health communityā€™s campaign to demonize smokers and all forms of tobacco is based onĀ junkĀ science.ā€

According to Heartland’s leaked financial documents, these Heartland pages are supported by tobacco companies such as Philip Morris, Altria, and RJ Reynolds. Specifically, the last two contributed $90,000 and $110,000 respectively, in the last twoĀ years.

The page goes on to produce other gems of scientific clarity such as, ā€œThe threat of secondhand smoke has been greatly exaggerated,ā€ and, ā€œSmoking in moderation has few, if any, adverse healthĀ effects.ā€

To be fair, it does demonize smokers at one point, insinuating how they become dangerous criminals when ushered out to the sidewalks because of indoor smokingĀ bans:

ā€œSmoking bans can also move noisy and potentially dangerous crowds onto sidewalks, and divert police resources from battling more seriousĀ crime.ā€

Like the noisy and potentially dangerous crowds that are still inside theĀ clubs?

Insane PR acrobatics aside, perhaps Pfizer is continuing its support of Heartland, which in recent years has summed up to as much as $130,000, because as a for-profit company, it knows that as long as there are people addicted to cigarettes, it can continue to peddle more medication to treat respiratoryĀ conditions.

Perhaps Pfizer should consider changing its mission statement from ā€œPfizer is committed to making the world a healthier place for future generations,ā€ to ā€œPfizer is committed to supporting the organizations that use Big Tobacco money to promote habits and policies that harm public health so it can continue to sell the medication to remedy the ailments caused by said habits and policies it helped promote in the firstĀ place.ā€

I guess the second one isn’t quite as catchy.

Check out Forecast the Facts petition to Pfizer here.

Related Posts

on

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

The Conservative candidate has changed his tune on climate action, recently attacking Labourā€™s net zero policies and arguing for new fossil fuel extraction.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.

Clintelā€™s fifth anniversary conference in town outside Amsterdam offers a glimpse of the groupā€™s transatlantic ties.
on

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

The government is being taken to court for failing to publish the evidence provided to ministers before they backed the controversial scheme.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.

Les responsables de campagne critiquent des programmes volontaires Ā« fortement dĆ©fectueux Ā», tandis que lā€™analyse de DeSmog rĆ©vĆØle l'absence de reprĆ©sentation de la sociĆ©tĆ© civile ou des communautĆ©s locales affectĆ©es par les dommages causĆ©s par lā€™industrie des farines et huiles de poisson.