No Price Tags on West Coast Paradise

authordefault
on

This is a guest post by Nikki Skuce, and originally appeared in the Edmonton Journal.

In Edmonton this week, experts and lawyers have gathered again at the Joint Review Panel hearings on Enbridgeโ€™s Northern Gateway Pipeline and tanker project. Theyโ€™ll challenge and defend percentages, growth, probabilities. Theyโ€™ll speak about projections and expectations. Theyโ€™ll talk about cost versusย benefit.

Meanwhile, on the West Coast, a fragile ecosystem is very much alive. Its emerald green islands slope into the Pacific Ocean. Eagles soar over Douglas Channel, feeding off migrating salmon. The rare spirit bear forages on a beach for clams and cockles, unaware that its future is being debated in an Alberta hearingย room.

Anyone paying attention to the panelโ€™s hearings that resumed two weeks ago in Edmonton has probably noticed a lot of numbers being thrown around. The current hearings focus on the pipelineโ€™s economics, which donโ€™t always add up โ€” price differentials, job numbers, refinery capacity, liabilities. But while Enbridge and other economic experts haggle over numbers, it seems obvious that some things canโ€™t be assigned a dollar value. Some things areย priceless.

The Great Bear Rainforest is an international treasure, home to magnificent cedar trees and the spirit (kermode) bear. Its waters are teeming with life โ€” humpback, orca and fin whales all feedย there.

In 2006, the B.C. government, federal government, First Nations, environmentalists and industry recognized the areaโ€™s pristine beauty and ecological values, and worked together to form a series of conservancies (more than two million hectares protected), ecosystem-based logging and conservation financing. Coastal First Nations have since invested millions of dollars into a sustainableย economy.

British Columbians understand how precious it is and how stormy conditions would be for crude oil supertankers introduced by Enbridge. Polls consistently show that close to 80 per cent of the province supports an oil tanker ban for Canadaโ€™s North Pacific Coast, and Coastal First Nations have declared an oil tanker ban in their traditionalย waters.

Many of B.C.โ€™s own thriving industries depend on clean water. Fisheries and tourism employ 45,000 people on the coast โ€” and that doesnโ€™t include inland jobs dependent on the healthy salmon watersheds Enbridgeโ€™s pipelines would cross. Salmon are the mainstay of the Northwestโ€™s economy, not to mention rich aboriginal cultures. An oil spill would put these inย jeopardy.

By comparison, Enbridge promises a mere 104 permanent operating positions with Northern Gateway and 113 positions with the associated marine services after construction. Enbridge CEO Patrick Daniel is also on record saying it would consider contracting PetroChina to build itsย pipeline.

This is the irony in opening remarks by Northern Gateway president John Carruthers at the hearings, comparing Enbridgeโ€™s proposed pipeline to the Canadian Pacific Railway. The railwayโ€™s dark history includes imported Chinese workers who suffered dangerous conditions, low pay and, for many, death. An increase in oilsands production from this pipeline would mean bringing in foreign workers to meet labour demands, displacing Canadian jobs that could have been sustained over the long term if the oilpatch were developed at a more sustainableย rate.

However, Carruthers is right about the proposed pipeline building community. The threat of poisoning B.C.โ€™s pristine rivers with bitumen destined for overseas markets has brought together non-traditional bedfellows โ€” First Nations, fishermen, hunters, businesses, municipalities, environmentalists, churches and Conservative voters โ€” in a fight for clean water and an oil-spill-free coast. Together, weโ€™re saying โ€œyesโ€ to our coast and wild salmon economies, and โ€œnoโ€ to oilsands pipelines, โ€œnoโ€ to supertankers, and โ€œnoโ€ toย Enbridge.

Cost-benefit analysis, in the end, needs to assess more than the economics and financial aspects of Enbridgeโ€™s project for British Columbians. But how do we put a price on the eagles, salmon and bears that rely on our clean coastline? How do we put our fresh water at risk of permanent contamination? What insurance company can replace the cultures and economies reliant on salmon and seafood if the coast becomes tarnished withย oil?

For most British Columbians, there is no overseas market for bitumen that would offset the loss of our Great Bear Rainforest and wild salmon rivers. There is no investment more lucrative than investing in clean water and sustainable economies for future generations. There is no insurance that can replace the great biodiversity and rich cultures that exist on ourย coast.

Some things are priceless. No matter how you crunch the numbers, they just arenโ€™t worth putting at risk to oilย spills.

Nikki Skuce is a senior energy campaigner with ForestEthics Advocacy, based in Smithers, B.C.

Image credit: Spawning male sockeye by Steven Russell Smith Photos | Shutterstock

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.
on

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.
on

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.
on

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€