Why the Media Is Right to Toss Climate Deniers' Opinions

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
on

Earlier this month, the Los Angeles Times officially confirmedย the paper is no longer running letters to the editor that deny the scientific conclusion that climate change is a reality and is caused mainly by humanย activities.ย 

Prior to this, the magazine Popular Science went even further and completely turned off the comments section for its entire website, stating quite eloquently that,ย โ€œEverything, from evolution to the origins of climate change, is mistakenly up for grabs again. Scientific certainty is just another thing for two people to ‘debate’ on television. And because comments sections tend to be a grotesque reflection of the media culture surrounding them, the cynical work of undermining bedrock scientific doctrine is now being done beneath our own stories, within a website devoted to championingย science.โ€

The L.A. Times editor stated the paper’s reasoning as,ย โ€œLetters that have an untrue basis (for example, ones that say there’s no sign humans have caused climate change) do not getย printed.โ€

The Sydney Morning Herald has subsequently announced it also won’t allow climate deniers to โ€œmisrepresent factsโ€ on climate science in letters – an especially powerful case given the terrifying fires ravaging Australia against a backdrop of continuing broken heat records.
ย 
As the former Editor of DeSmogBlog, most of the climate deniers and self-proclaimed skeptics I have encountered over the years have been paid by Exxon, the Koch brothers or other such industry interests, making a good living as fake experts for hire. They are manipulators of the truth.

Of course, not all are paid mouthpieces, and some of them just simply believe that climate change isn’t happening or it isn’t caused by burning fossilย fuels.ย 

To those people not being paidย by industryย to sell doubt, to those who in their heart-of-hearts actually question the realities of climate change, I would say they have every right to submit their opinions as letters to a newspaper.

But just like the guy who sends in a letter each week to the paper insisting he was abducted by aliens, or that 9-11 was a hoax, it is up to the paper to decide what to print and what to throw in the wasteย basket.

Popular Science has every right to turn off their comment section. Especially if they think their comment section is a detriment to the advancement of scientific knowledge – the very thing Popular Science is in the business ofย doing.

Here on DeSmogBlog we turned off our comments section for over a year after we were overrun with all sorts of crazy climate change conspiracy theorists. Eventually we turned the comments back on, but only after posting a comment policy requesting commenters to post links to scientific evidence when making claims about climate science, and implementing a more strict community moderationย system.

On another level this controversy over the right to comment and opine on matters of science is completely ridiculous, because science is not something to be debated in letters to newspapers or on blogs. Science is based on proposing, testing and replicating hypotheses and then posting your findings first to a group of your peers for review and then to the public via credible scientific journals. It is this scientific process that is the bedrock of anything we call a scientificย truth.ย 

The scientfic process, especially in North America, has been compromised by the idea that all opinions are as valid as another, or that an opinion is as valid as a proven scientific conclusion. But as the late astronomer and thinker Carl Sagan quite prophetically onceย said:

โ€œโ€ฆthe fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo theย Clown.โ€

If you want to stand in denial of the mountains of scientific evidence backing the realities of climate change and its causes, go ahead. But we don’t have to listen and we don’t have to publish your opinions.ย If you think you have something to contribute regarding the science of climate change, then spend your time doing the scientific research to back your claims, rather than writing letters to the editor.

Image credit: Name tag from Shutterstock

picture-8-1346574554.jpg
Kevin is a contributor and strategic adviser to DeSmog. He runs the digital marketing agency Spake Media House. Named a โ€œGreen Heroโ€ by Rolling Stone Magazine and one of the โ€œTop 50 Tweetersโ€ on climate change and environment issues, Kevin has appeared in major news media outlets around the world for his work on digital campaigning. Kevin has been involved in the public policy arena in both the United States and Canada for more than a decade. For five years he was the managing editor of DeSmogBlog.com. In this role, Kevinโ€™s research into the โ€œclimate denial industryโ€ and the right-wing think tank networks was featured in news media articles around the world. He is most well known for his ground-breaking research into David and Charles Kochโ€™s massive financial investments in the Republican and tea partyย networks. Kevin is the first person to be designated a โ€œCertified Expertโ€ on theย political and community organizing platformย NationBuilder. Prior to DeSmog, Kevin worked in various political and government roles. He was Senior Advisor to the Minister of State for Multiculturalism and a Special Assistant to the Minister of State for Asia Pacific, Foreign Affairs for the Government of Canada. Kevin also worked in various roles in the British Columbia provincial government in the Office of the Premier and the Ministry of Health. In 2008 Kevin co-founded a groundbreaking new online election tool called Vote for Environment which was later nominated for a World Summit Award in recognition of the worldโ€™s best e-Content and innovative ICTย applications. Kevin moved to Washington, DC in 2010 where he worked for two years as the Director of Online Strategy for Greenpeace USA and has since returned to his hometown of Vancouver, Canada.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.