Six years have passed since TransCanada originally sought a permit for the Keystone XL pipeline, and Republicans in Washington have not given up fighting for the project. In spite of the fact that the pipeline will create fewer than 40 permanent jobsserious risks to potable water suppliespotentially raise energy prices for American consumers, some of our elected officials still believe that the pipeline would be a boon for the United States.
In the last week, the Republican-led efforts to force President Obama to approve the disaster of a plan have reached a fevered pitch. To begin with, to mark the 6th anniversary of the original permit application, every single Republican in the U.S. Senate signed a letter to President Obama demanding that he take action and approve the pipeline.
In the letter, Republican Senator John Hoeven (R-ND) played on the fears of American citizens while trying to force an approval. Hoeven wrote: “After more than six years of study, five favorable environmental reviews, numerous polls showing the support of the American people, ISIS and the turmoil in the Middle East, it is way past time we take off the blinders and do what is in the best interest of the United States: approve the Keystone XL pipeline.”
Not to be outdone, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell made an appeal to the American public (and the dirty energy industry) by making the bold claim that, if Republicans gain control of the Senate in this year’s midterm elections, the Keystone XL pipeline will be one of their top priorities. McConnell claimed, “If we have a new majority next year, and a new majority leader, the Keystone pipeline will be voted on on the floor of the Senate, something the current majority has been avoiding for literally years.”
Even before the anniversary of the application, Senate Republicans were hard at work trying to force the project’s approval. A few days before they sent a letter to the President, Senate Republicans (and a West Virginia Democrat) introduced a bill that would strip the President of his authority to approve pipeline projects, and would limit the review period by the State Department down to 120 days. According to The Hill, the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed a similar bill back in June.
Senate Democrats point out that, while the bill would not apply to any permits already up for consideration, it would allow TransCanada to pull their application for Keystone XL and then reapply under the new rules.
Even if the bill were to pass the Senate, the President has vowed to veto it. But the main goal of these elected officials is not to get the project approved, but to give the industry the appearance that they are doing their bidding.
With contentious midterm elections right around the corner and public approval of Washington politicians at historic lows, incumbents will need dirty energy money to convince the public that they deserve another round in D.C., and making bold promises about the Keystone XL pipeline is a great place to begin that pandering.