Did David Cameron Forget Climate Change Section in His Leader's Speech?

authordefault
on

David Cameron warned the Conservative party conference in his barnstorming speech that โ€œthe dangers of climate change are stark and very realโ€ and โ€œif we donโ€™t act now, and act quickly, we could faceย disaster.โ€

This was, however, during his speech before delegates in Manchester in 2009, as the party readied itself for the 2010 general election when the arch-moderniser was promising voters they could โ€œvote blue, go green.โ€

Today, in Birmingham, speaking under the banner Securing A Better Future, it appears that the Conservative leader hadย forgotten the sections of his speech where he evoked chaotic climate change and the threat to Britainโ€™s green and pleasentย land.

Precarious economic growth, the threat of terrorism and war in the Middle East, and the ever-present threat of welfare claimants, mean there are enough real and present dangers keeping the pinstripe suits nervously loyal, without having to worry too much about theย planet.

The Prime Minister was also clearly preoccupied with a sexting scandalย andย the desertions from the Conservative party to right-wing rivals the UK Independence Party (UKIP)โ€”including threats and defections among those who areย furious with the leadership for supporting climate changeย policies.ย 

The Conservatives are โ€œdetoxifying the Tory brandโ€, and appealing to Labour party values by promising more funding for the National Health Service rather than applying greenwash to their sky-blueย backdrop.

Five years is an eternity in politics. The contrast between the Cameron speech of 2009 and that of 2014 is stark when viewed through the prism of environmentalism and climateย change.ย 

Back then, he said: โ€œAnd to be British is to have an instinctive love of the countryside and the natural world. The dangers of climate change are stark and very real. If we don’t act now, and act quickly, we could faceย disaster.

โ€œYes, we need to change the way we live. But is that such a bad thing? The insatiable consumption and materialism of the past decade, has it made us happier, or moreย fulfilled?

โ€œYes, we have to put our faith in technologies. But that is not a giant leap. Just around the corner are new green technologies, unimaginable a decade ago, that can change the way we live, travel,ย work.

โ€œAnd yes, we need global co-operation. But that shouldn’t be difficult. It just takes leadership, and that’s what we need at the Copenhagen summit thisย December.โ€

And then he added: โ€œLet’s work together on the things where the EU can really help, like combating climate change, fighting global poverty, and spreading free and fairย trade.โ€

The Conservatives failed to win the 2010 general election and were forced into an alliance with the Liberal Democrats to form a coalition government. The Lib Dems had even stronger climate policies, and some environmental charities were mildly optimistic about theย future.

But today Cameron barely mentioned the threat of global warming. Around 56 minutes into an hour speech as he mostly repeated the main themes of the election pitch he said he would lead a countryย โ€œthatโ€™s leading and not following on climateย change.โ€

And then he added: โ€œWeโ€™re making Britain proud again.ย Our exports to China doubling. Our car industry booming.ย Our aerospace expanding. Our manufacturing growing. Weโ€™re making Britain proud again.ย Car engines โ€“ not imported from Germany, but built down the road in Wolverhampton.ย New oil rigs โ€“ not made in China, but built on theย Tyne.โ€ย 

The agenda-setting speech came two days after George Osborne, the chancellor who promised to review the Climate Change Act, failed to mention global warming directly in hisย speech.

The man who controls Britainโ€™s money promised a decision on a new runway in the South East, forcefully supported fracking for shale gas, boasted about keeping duties on fuel low, and also promised a new generation of nuclear powerย stations.

And Liz Truss, the secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs, mentioned climate change only twice in her speech, compared to three headline-grabbing mentions of Britishย cheese and four of apples.

Related Posts

on

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies
on

The worldโ€™s largest advertising and public relations firms continue to get the majority of their work from major polluters, a new report has found. Known as the โ€œBig Six,โ€ WPP, Omnicom, Interpu...
on

Unique collaboration convenes leaders from the global climate and trauma healing movements to explore the neglected inner dimensions of the crisis.

Unique collaboration convenes leaders from the global climate and trauma healing movements to explore the neglected inner dimensions of the crisis.
Analysis
on

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.