Rio Earth Summit: From Red Scare to Green Scare

authordefault
on

Once heralded as a clear turning point, government participation at the Rio Earth Summitโ€™s would soon be seen as more symbolic than effective. The DeSmog UK epic history seriesย continues.

The Rio Earth Summit in July 1992 was celebrated by environmentalists as the clearest sign that the world’s leaders would support limits to carbon emissions and literally save the world from the imminent catastrophe of climateย change.

George Bush Snr, the Republican president, oil millionaire and former CIA director, signed the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change that summer with the promise that he would ensure the document would become โ€œconcrete action to protect theย planetโ€.

Partyย Gatecrasher

The Convention was signed by a total 156 countries and only needed ratification by 50 to come into force. The event was marked with a special ceremony. However, the late IPCC founding chairman, Bert Bolin, detected that the IPCC was seen as a โ€œthreatโ€ and a gatecrasher at its ownย party.

โ€œNot until the celebrations were in full swing did the [Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee] INC Chairman, Jean Ripert, informally call me to the podium to join the others who were congratulating each other,โ€ Bolinย recalled.

According to Rupert Darwall, author of The Age of Global Warming: A History, Bush Snr noticeably spent โ€œas little time at Rio as he decentlyย could.โ€

Darwall adds: โ€œHe gave a speech, signed the climate change convention, and had his photo taken with the one hundred and seven other world leaders at theย summit.โ€

But history would soon expose the tragic reality of the conference. The โ€œconvention’s teeth had been pulled with the removal of legally bindings targets.โ€ Darwallย writes.

The convention and the participation of the president was symbolic more than it was effective. It would be the first of the regular major jamborees rather than a decisive turningย point.

Direย Warnings

Nonetheless, this did not stop the sceptics making dire warnings about the threat it posed to democracy. Fred Smith of the Exxon funded Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) was flown out to Rio by the Free Congress Committee and given press credentials to observe theย delegates.

Dixy Lee Ray, perhaps the most vociferous anti-environmentalist author of her day, also went along for the ride. She characterised Agenda 21, as signed at Rio, as imposing โ€œworld government under the UN, [so] that essentially all governments give up their sovereignty, and that nations will be, as they said quite openly, frightened or coerced into doing that by threats of environmentalย damageโ€.

Ray detected at the conference an undue influence by socialists and transferred the terror of communism after the fall of the Soviet Union into the fear of environmentalism. She claimed: โ€œThe International Socialist Party, which is intent upon continuing to press countries into socialism, is now headed up by people within the Unitedย Nations.

โ€œThey are the ones in the UN environmental program, and they were the ones sponsoring the so-called Earth Summit that was attended by 178ย nations.โ€

Greenย Scare

As the academics Peter Jaques and Riley Dunlop observed, the Red Scare switched automatically to the Greenย Scare.

Later, Smith was able to use his experience of Rio to convince his friends within the network of free market think tanks that a major threat lay just over theย horizon.

As Political Science professor at Virginia Tech and author of A Rough Road Out of Rio, Timothy Luke, would write: โ€œThe 1992 ‘Earth Summit’ in Rio, in particular, marked an important turning point. The US conservative movement began to see global environmentalism as a threat to US national sovereignty and economic power, and became aggressivelyย anti-environmental.โ€

Even the American president was particularly susceptible to the scepticism within the Republican party as Bush Snr sought the endorsement of his party to stand for a second time asย president.

And in the beginning, the business lobby group Global Climate Coalition – formed in 1989 in response to IPCC findings – would lead the charge. It would prove one of the most outspoken and confrontational industry groups in the US fighting against attempts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions before it closed-up shop inย 2002.

Next week: DeSmog UKโ€™s epic history series recounts the moment when John Blundell was recruited into Antony Fisherโ€™s free-market think tank, the Institute of Economicย Affairs.

@Brendanmontague

Photo: RIA Novosti via Wikimediaย Commons

Related Posts

on

The SEC move is a warning to the financial industry that false claims about fossil fuel involvement can carry consequences.

The SEC move is a warning to the financial industry that false claims about fossil fuel involvement can carry consequences.
on

Unraveling a $122 million web of climate denial, political extremism, and Trump campaign ties.

Unraveling a $122 million web of climate denial, political extremism, and Trump campaign ties.
on

PR and consulting agencies are being paid millions to focus the worldโ€™s attention on a promised โ€œeco-cityโ€ โ€” obscuring human rights abuses and Saudi Arabiaโ€™s long record of climate obstruction.

PR and consulting agencies are being paid millions to focus the worldโ€™s attention on a promised โ€œeco-cityโ€ โ€” obscuring human rights abuses and Saudi Arabiaโ€™s long record of climate obstruction.
on

Damage to oceans is releasing vast amounts of CO2, despite efforts to market fish as a sustainable food.

Damage to oceans is releasing vast amounts of CO2, despite efforts to market fish as a sustainable food.