Willie Soon A Heartland Institute Star Since 2003: Was He Paid? If So, When And With Whose Money?

authordefault
on

Willie Soon has gained a global spotlight from many recent news articles (New York Times, Boston Globe, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, etc).ย  This was lit by documents obtained from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA), whose former director had said of Soon that โ€œno one pays any attention to him.โ€ย  Anย impassioned defense was published, not by the CfA, but by the Heartland Institute, for whom he seems vastly more important, a tireless star.ย  Heartland has even purchased Google AdWords, so the first hit for Willie Soon isย this:

Heartland buys Google AdWords for Willie Soon

Soon’s frequent efforts for Heartland started no later than 2003.ย  They raise questions about potential unreported Conflict of Interestย  even if unpaid. But did Heartland pay him? If so, how much, when, for what and with whose money? Heartland is a tax-exempt 501(c)(3) โ€œpublic charityโ€ whose climate anti-science tactics were preceded by a long history of paid efforts for tobacco companies, as per Fakery 2: More Funny Finances, Free Of Tax.

Readers unfamiliar wiith Soon might start with DeSmogBlog’s profile. and follow by readingย  story of a personal encounter. The history and other details motivate some questions, summarized next, then explained inย detail.

Q1: Was Soon paid as Lead Author for Heartland’s NIPCC (2013)?
Q2: Was Soon paid as Lead Author for Heartland’s NIPCC (2011)?
Q3: Did Heartland pay Soon expenses or speaking fees for conferences?
Q4: How did Soon get connected with Donors Trust and funded by it?
Q5: Did Heartland pay Soon for any articles in their newsletter?
Q6: Did Heartland pay Soon as a Heartland โ€œExpertโ€?
Q7: Where has Hearland gotten the money for climateย anti-science?

Maybe these questions will start being asked by people who can demandย answers.

Q1: The 2012 Heartland Budget pp.7-8 detailed Heartland’s spending plan for its 2013 Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) report.
It allocated $467,000 for โ€œ(2) Payment to lead authors and contributors.โ€ Subsection authors were to get $500-$1,000/month. It listed Willie Soon โ€œcontributor – paid by review – assume $1500/year.โ€ย ($125/month).

This only proved intent to pay and Heartland needed to raise money, as seen in their 2012 Fundraising Plan. However, the final report showed Soon not as reviewer but as Lead Author of Chapter 3 – Solar Forcing,ย  which must have been demanding, since his co-Lead was a fossil company geologist, Sebastian Luning.
The report was published and Soon played a major role.
Was he paid and paid comparably with the other Leadย Authors?

Q2: Soon was also a Contributor to the NIPCC (2011) Report, pp.415-416. Fakery 2, pp.34-36, 43-67 analyzes the report and its financials, rather opaque since NIPCC is not broken out separately.ย  Was he paid anything for thisย work?

Q3: Soon spoke at 6 Heartland International Climate Conferences (ICCCn):

nย  yearย ย ย  City ย  ย  ย ย  Soon’s talk, linked to video when available
1 2008 New Yorkย โ€œAn Overview of Global Warming Scienceโ€
Although he usually quit claimng CfA affiliation for such talks, sponsors often remained โ€œconfused.โ€ As late as 2011, the Wall Street Journal curiously described him as โ€œMr. Soon, a natural scientist at Harvard, is an expert on mercury and public health issues.โ€
In a report to the Southern Company, p.57(b), Soon claimed credit for this talk, although he gave a different title: โ€œGlobal Warming 101: Al Gore’s CO2 Theory.โ€”ย  One might ask who actually paid for this trip.ย  Heartland? Southern? Soonย himself?

2 2009 New York โ€œDisconnects in Sun-climate Studies: Removing Politics from theย Scienceโ€

4 2010 Chicago โ€œThe Sun, the Milky Way and the C02ย Monsterโ€

6 2011 Washington, DC โ€œA Circum-Global View on Sun-Climateย Connectionโ€

7 2012 Chicago โ€œAlmighty CO2, Giant Boa Snake and the Sun (What controls the equator-to-pole temperature distribution of the earthโ€™s surface?)โ€
Brendan Montague reported an unusual interview:

During a one-hour, nine minute interview he managed to attack his former sponsors at ExxonMobil, disparage his hosts at Heartland, and reveal that his employers were already seriously angry about his oil and coalย sponsorships.ย โ€ฆ

โ€œOf course I will be labelled. I donโ€™t want to go to the think tank because itโ€™s going to immediately label you. But remember, I haveย toย eat.โ€

Indeed, Soon was very disparaging about his fellow presenters at the Heartland Institute conference in Chicagoย thatย year.

โ€œIn my point of view I can say that 50 percent is wrong hereย โ€”ย too extreme. People are trying to argue that you cannot make a CO2 measurement,โ€ heย said.’

9 2014 Las Vegas โ€œIPCC: Gangster Scienceโ€ plus โ€œStill โ€˜Gangster Science’ and โ€œWinner of the Courage in Defense of Science Awardโ€ See DeSmogBlog post.

Readers might sample these general-audience talks and decide whether they are science or anti-science. If these xamples are insufficient,ย  many more are available for the trulyย persistent.

Q4: In February 2012, DeSmogBlog published Fake science, fakexperts, funny finances, free of tax, whose search for Heartland funding led to examination of Donors Trust, later shown to be a key dark money funder of climate denial, including that of Heartland.ย  It was a quite obscure entity not known for funding climate science, but somehow Soonย got funding from it in 2010. Was Soon led to this by Heartland, also funded? If so, who helped him? Who was the real funder using Donors Trust to mask identity fromย CfA?

More research was integrated into the Fakery 2 update later in 2012, adding more data on Donors Trust, pp.68-76.ย  Case-sensitive PDF Search for โ€œSoonโ€ yields 35 hits, so he was quite visible in Heartlandย material.

Q5: In 2003, Soon started publishing articles and getting quoted often in Heartland’s Environment and Climate News (E&CN), summarized on Fakery 2 p.97. Was he paid or just happy to publish these somewhere? He certainly got quoted often by others. Following are 4 articles found during 2001-January 2012:
p.140 2003.07-1 Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas
Analysis Finds Our Climate Unremarkable
This was an infamously bad paper, led to mass resignations, published via โ€œpal review.โ€
p.154 2005.01-17 Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas
Consensus Can Be Bad for Climate Science
p.155 2005.02-11 Willie Soon and Sallie Baliunas
Wind Farms May Threaten Crop Productions
p.164 2006.02-17 Willie Soon
Fish Is Good for You โ€œSuch mercury fears are unfounded inย science.โ€

Fakery 2 links to the actual E&CN issues so readers can see theย text.

Q6: Soon is a Heartland โ€œExpert,โ€ย one of many. Do any of them get paid? Or is this perhaps just an ego-boost for people willing to affiliate with a group that still supports nicotine addiction of teenagers and young adults?

Q7: Heartland has a proven history of donations from direct or indirect fossil-energy interests (Fakery 2, pp.43-67), but much funding is still dark. Unlike Soon’s grants at CfA, Heartland does not reveal donors or their connections to specific activities, and Donors Trust seems designed to get around IRS disclosureย rules.

Money is fungible. If Heartland seriously expects anyone to believe there has been zero fossil fuel money behind its climate anti-science efforts, it can prove that by publishing the real donors and the money flows.ย  Whether from corporations, individuals or private foundations, it is unclear why these activities deserve tax-breaks.ย  Who has paid for Heartland climateย anti-science?

There still remain many questions on payments and undisclosed conflicts of interest, questions that ought to be asked by people who can getย answers.

Soon may have been a star for Heartland, but sometimes stars goย nova.

RELATED ARTICLES PUBLISHED ON DESMOGBLOG:ย 

Willie Soon Attacks Funders of Climate Denial for ‘Lack of Courage’

How Often Were Willie Soonโ€™s Industry-Funded โ€œDeliverablesโ€ Referenced by the IPCC?

Heartland Institute 58 Experts Poster Remixed by DeSmog, Willie Soon Among Denialistย Dozens

Heartland Institute Exposed: Internal Documents Unmask Heart of Climate Denialย Machineย 

UPDATE 03/06/15 Added the Heartland Google Adwords coment and image. Removed *s for aย  few URLs that did not seem to work when this was written, but unchanged, work now.ย  H/T Lionelย Smith.

Related Posts

on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.
on

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€
on

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies

One candidate has sworn off taking money from regulated companies
on

The worldโ€™s largest advertising and public relations firms continue to get the majority of their work from major polluters, a new report has found. Known as the โ€œBig Six,โ€ WPP, Omnicom, Interpu...