Climate Science Denialist Matt Ridley Criticised By Same Scientist He Sourced On Greening Planet Claims

authordefault
on

A scientist whose research has been used by prominent climate science denialists Lord Matt Ridley and Rupert Murdoch to claim carbon dioxide is good for the planet has hit back at the โ€œselective presentationโ€ of hisย work.

Professor Ranga Myneni, of Boston University, has been researching satellite data showing how the extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels is contributing to increased plant growth across theย planet.

In an article published in the Murdoch-owned The Times and reproduced in Murdochโ€™s The Australian, Ridley said 30 years of satellite data showed plant growth had risen by 14 per cent across theย world.

I asked Lord Ridley on Twitter about the source for his satellite data and he pointed me to a 2013 presentation by Professor Myneni.

Myneni told DeSmogย the presentation Lord Ridley had cited had not been peer reviewed and was โ€œwork in progressโ€ but hoped it would appear as two scientific articles, one of which was in review at the journal Nature Climateย Change.

He said his analysis of satellite data covering the last 30 years did show a 13 to 14 per cent increase in vegetation growth. He said some of this could be attributed to increased levels of carbon dioxide, but changes in the way land was management was also aย factor.

Myneni,ย in Norway for a meeting of ecologists to discuss vegetation changes in remote regions,ย said โ€œin the context of being good versus badโ€ he was โ€œworried about how this work is beingย interpretedโ€.

He said Ridleyโ€™s story โ€œsuffers from selective presentation of factsโ€ and would โ€œnot surviveย peer-reviewโ€.ย 

If one were to interpret the greening of the Earth as a good or a positive development then one must also accept that the accompanying climate changes (global warming, for example) and its physical (sea level rise) and biotic impacts (polar bears) as bad or negativeย developments.

Again, in my opinion, this benefit of greening is not worth price of all the negativeย changes.

Humans are one amongst many species on Earth and we have no right conducting such experiments that affect all forms of life – it is simply indecent, deeply vulgar and inhuman (you can choose anyย adjective).

This is not the first time that Ridley has cited Myneniโ€™s work. He first did so in a January 2013 column in the Wall Street Journal, prompting Murdoch himself to tell his Twitter followers that the satellite data showed the planet was โ€œgrowing greener with increasedย carbon.โ€

Ridley, who earns undisclosed but likely substantial money from coal mining on his family’s estate, also cited Myneniโ€™s work in an October 2013 story in The Spectator.

Ridleyโ€™s article in The Times also promoted a report written by Dr Indur Goklany and published by the climate science denialist lobby group the Global Warming Policy Foundation.

The report, titled Carbon Dioxide: The good news, makes a number of claims about the supposed benefits of adding carbon dioxide to the atmosphere while dismissing the well documented impacts, including rising temperature extremes, sea level rise and damage to oceanย ecosystems.

Like Ridley, Goklany is a member of the GWPFโ€™s academic advisoryย council.

Ridley claimed the report was โ€œwas thoroughly peer ยญreviewedโ€ which would usually be taken to mean that independent scientists had looked at theย manuscript.

But through tweets from the official GWPF account and Professor Ross McKitrick, the chair of the GWPFโ€™s advisory council, it appears that instead the document was sent around to other GWPF members forย review.

McKitrick said Goklanyโ€™s report was โ€œa survey of findings previously published in peer-reviewed scientific journalsโ€.ย However, Goklanyโ€™s report includes references to the work of another climate science denialist, Craig Idso.

The same Idso report was cited heavily by a 2014 coal industry report that also argued that extra CO2 in the atmosphere would be good for plants andย crops.

The GWPF report says Goklany has previously been an โ€œIPCC reviewerโ€ and is an โ€œindependent scientistโ€.ย  The report does not mention that Goklany has long associations with several conservative think tanks that have worked to promote climate science denial, including the Heartland Institute.

Leaked internal documents from Heartland listed Goklany as receiving $1000 per month for work on its โ€œalternativeโ€ Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Changeย reports.

Ridleyโ€™s column in The Times also promoted the views of denialist Patrick Moore, who delivered the GWFโ€™s annual lecture earlier this month.ย Moore is not a climate scientist but has claimed there is โ€œno scientific proofโ€ that humans are causing globalย warming.

Photo: Matt Ridley. Image: Flickr/IAB UK

Related Posts

on

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.

Lucy von Sturmer and Duncan Meisel are building communities of creatives dedicated to preventing the advertising and public relations industry from casting polluters as climate saviours.
Opinion
on

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.

It's time to come together to collectively work through the anxiety, grief and overwhelm so many of us are experiencing.
on

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.

UCP pledges to abandon the provinceโ€™s net zero targets, and remove the designation of CO2 as a pollutant.
on

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€

Speaking at the UCP annual general meeting, the Premier took shots at the federal government and vowed not to โ€œbudge an inch.โ€