Australian Government Withdraws $4 Million Grant For Climate Contrarian Bjorn Lomborg's Consensus Project

authordefault
onOct 23, 2015 @ 00:46 PDT

The Australian taxpayers’ short, fractious, โ€œon again, off againโ€ relationship with climate science contrarian Bjorn Lomborg has come to anย end.

Lomborgโ€™s think tank, the Copenhagen Consensus Center, was once courted by the prior Australian government with an offer of $4 million of taxpayer funding to set up shop at a university.ย But this week it was revealed during parliamentary hearings that the government had quietly withdrawn the offer ofย funding.

Lomborg is the president and founder of the Copenhagen Consensus Center (CCC) think tank, registered in the United States with no actual discernible connection toย Copenhagen.

The Danish political scientist is known for his attacks on renewable energy and claims that the worldโ€™s poorest nations need fossil fuels to solve energy povertyย issues.ย 

Investigations by DeSmog have revealed how the Copenhagen Consensus Center think tank had attracted funding from conservative foundations, including that of controversial โ€œvulture capitalistโ€ and Republican Party benefactor Paulย Singer.

DeSmog also unravelled a constant claim from the CCC that it worked with โ€œseven Nobel laureatesโ€ โ€” we discovered that one had died two years previously, while others had only a minimal involvement with theย center.

In April, the University of Western Australia announced it was to establish a research center that would partner with Lomborgโ€™s CCC.

But it later emerged that funding for the center had come from a $4 million government grant which was not initially disclosed in the university’sย publicity.

Leading climate economist Dr Frank Jotzo criticised Lomborg and his centerโ€™s approach, saying it had โ€œno academic credibilityโ€ and that the so-called โ€œconsensus methodologyโ€ wasย flawed.

After weeks of campaigning and public criticismย โ€”ย much of it from academics and students โ€” the UWA Vice Chancellor Paul Johnson announced that his university was handing the money back.ย  He said the university was in an โ€œuntenable position as it lacks the support needed across the University and the broader academic community to meet its contractualย obligationsโ€.

The rejection prompted a campaign in support of Lomborg, backed by a group with links to climate science denial and free market activism, while other shrill conservative voices claimed that โ€œfreedom of speechโ€ demanded that Lomborg be allowed to establish theย centre.

Flinders University in South Australia emerged as another suitor to Lomborg, prompting a campaign by academics andย students.

The Guardian reported that the dean of the school of social and policy studies at the university, Debra King, wrote that her staff did not support any plan to work with Lomborg, due to his โ€œacademic legitimacy and the politicisation of the process of establishing aย partnershipโ€.

Writing in The Australian newspaper, which ran many editorials and stories supporting the consensus project, Lomborg protested that his centre had been misrepresented and that it would not be focusing on climateย change.

Lomborgโ€™s column appeared in the newspaper on October 13 but, according to reports, the decision to drop the $4 million from the federal budget had been made almost a monthย earlier.

authordefault
Admin's short bio, lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit. Voluptate maxime officiis sed aliquam! Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipisicing elit.

Related Posts

onNov 17, 2025 @ 10:23 PST

After MEPs voted to gut Europeโ€™s flagship climate transparency law, concerns are mounting that the Big Four will dominate and dilute corporate sustainability audits.

After MEPs voted to gut Europeโ€™s flagship climate transparency law, concerns are mounting that the Big Four will dominate and dilute corporate sustainability audits.

Doctors and models extol the virtues of meat as climate impacts of industrial farming face scrutiny at COP30 โ€” the global climate summit.

Doctors and models extol the virtues of meat as climate impacts of industrial farming face scrutiny at COP30 โ€” the global climate summit.
onNov 14, 2025 @ 07:04 PST

Their access to the summit is proof that Big Oil still holds "a dangerous sway" over the climate process, campaigners say.

Their access to the summit is proof that Big Oil still holds "a dangerous sway" over the climate process, campaigners say.
onNov 13, 2025 @ 21:01 PST

Delegationโ€™s composition consistent with new KBPO report revealingย this yearโ€™s U.N. climate talks have the largest number of fossil fuel lobbyists to date.

Delegationโ€™s composition consistent with new KBPO report revealingย this yearโ€™s U.N. climate talks have the largest number of fossil fuel lobbyists to date.