EPA Scientists Consider Dropping "Widespread, Systemic" Language from National Study Findings

headshot-original-2.jpg
on

A phrase in the Executive Summary of EPA‘s national study on the threat that hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, poses to American drinking water supplies has come under increasing fire from environmentalists and scientists.

The EPA‘s draft executive summary, released this fall, included a line that has been widely quoted by supporters of the shale gas rush: “We did not find evidence that these mechanisms have lead to widespread, systemic impacts on drinking water resources in the United States.”

There are signs that the EPA‘s scientific advisors, currently engaged in a peer-review of the study, are now backing away from that phrasing, emphasizing instead the fact that drinking water supplies have been impacted at times, and that many factors, like sealed legal settlements and trade secrecy, have kept information out of the public eye.

“There’s agreement the sentence needs to be modified,” Prof. David Dzombak, who chairs the EPA scientific advisory board, told E&E News. “The sentence is ambiguous and requires clarification.”

As DeSmog reported earlier this week, at a advisory board meeting last Friday, the gathered scientists broke out into applause when Prof. Thomas M. Young offered an alternative version. Prof. Young’s wording, which also appears in his written commentary, appears below.
 

headshot-original-2.jpg
Sharon Kelly is an attorney and freelance writer based in Philadelphia. She has reported for The New York Times, The Guardian, The Nation, National Wildlife, Earth Island Journal, and a variety of other publications. Prior to beginning freelance writing, she worked as a law clerk for the ACLU of Delaware.

Related Posts

on

We debunk some key concepts that the world’s largest food and farming companies will be using to sway debates at the climate summit.

We debunk some key concepts that the world’s largest food and farming companies will be using to sway debates at the climate summit.
on

Research will be for oil sands decarbonization, but critics say the move doubles down on fossil fuel use and production.

Research will be for oil sands decarbonization, but critics say the move doubles down on fossil fuel use and production.
on

Rishi Sunak appears to have sided with anti-green MPs as officials are left confused over how the UK will achieve its legal commitment to net zero.

Rishi Sunak appears to have sided with anti-green MPs as officials are left confused over how the UK will achieve its legal commitment to net zero.
on

Government keeps the ex-Australian leader on the high profile advisory body despite previous calls to sack him over anti-green ties.

Government keeps the ex-Australian leader on the high profile advisory body despite previous calls to sack him over anti-green ties.