Large Methane Leaks Highlight Ongoing Risk to Climate

mikulka color
on

A new study of the recent methane leak in Aliso Canyon, California confirms that it was the largest methane leak in US history. According to the study, the disasterโ€™s impact on the climate will be equivalent to the effect of annual greenhouse gas emissions from over half a million cars.

Last week at the oil industry gathering CERAweek, Reuters reportedย Environmental Protection Agency chief Gina McCarthy revealed that, โ€œMethane emissions from existing sources in the oil and gas sector are substantially higher than we previously understood.โ€

Also last week, the Texas Observer reported that the combined methane leaks of the Barnett Shale gas fields was actually greater than the volume of the Aliso Canyon disaster โ€” contributing 8% of nationwide methane emissions. And while the Aliso Canyon well has been capped, the Barnett shale emissions continueย on.

Since the comparative impact of methane on climate change is 25 times greater than carbon dioxide, this growing evidence that the problem is much bigger than previously thought indicates the urgent need to define and address theย issue.

Weak New Regulations and Voluntaryย Reporting

Prior to the Aliso Canyon leak, the Obama administration had proposed new rules for the oil and gas industry regarding methane leaks.ย But there is a significant loophole โ€” the rules will only apply to new infrastructure and not the existing facilities currently leaking methane. ย 

It is clear that the Aliso Canyon leak could have been prevented if the well operator had simply installed a safety valve on the well and there was greater regulatory oversight. However, an audit released last October of the state regulatory agency responsible found โ€œinconsistent permitting, monitoring and enforcement of well construction and operation.โ€

At the time Steve Bohlen, state oil and gas supervisor admitted, โ€œThe division hasn’t owned up to its responsibility as a regulator in the past.โ€

Without regulations to address the existing gas production and storage infrastructure it is highly unlikely there will be a significant reduction in emissions.

Additionally, the EPA has not had much success getting industry cooperation on this issue. In order to better understand the scope of the problem the EPA requested that gas producers voluntarily report methane emissions. According to Reuters, only eight out of 8,000 producers volunteered the information.

Voluntaryย Vigilance

Russell Gold documented the growth of the fracking industry in his industry-friendly book The Boom. Gold recently wrote about a poll about concerns of fracking contaminating drinking water and he referenced some insight from Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz.

A couple years ago, then MIT professor and current Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz said the risks of fracking were โ€œmanageableโ€ although he warned that we shouldnโ€™t assume that meant it was being managed. The same is true today. Vigilance is stillย required.

The problem with this argument is we are relying on the oil industry to volunteer to be vigilant. And history has proven this is a losing bet.

In 2014, Inside Climate News published the results of an eight month investigation into the emissions from Texas drilling operations. The report details numerous problems including reluctant regulators, oversight budget reductions, industry friendly politicians and widespread allowance of voluntary auditing of methane emissions.

Robert Forbis Jr., an assistant professor of political science at Texas Tech University, summed up the situation in Texas to Inside Climate News.

โ€œEnergy wins practically every time,โ€ Forbis said. โ€œIt seems cynical to say that, but that’s how states see itโ€”promote economic development and minimize risk factors.โ€

Addressing the ever growing methane emission problem will require tough new regulations, monitoring and oversight โ€” not voluntary measures. Based on the EPAโ€™s recent experience of asking the industry to volunteer to address the problem we know the odds of success are eight in eight thousand and those numbers just arenโ€™t going to get the job done.

Blog image credit: Energy Information Administration

ย 
mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

on

The worldโ€™s largest advertising and public relations firms continue to get the majority of their work from major polluters, a new report has found. Known as the โ€œBig Six,โ€ WPP, Omnicom, Interpu...
on

Unique collaboration convenes leaders from the global climate and trauma healing movements to explore the neglected inner dimensions of the crisis.

Unique collaboration convenes leaders from the global climate and trauma healing movements to explore the neglected inner dimensions of the crisis.
Analysis
on

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.

The new Labour government is pledging billions to support projects based on climate-heating natural gas.
Analysis
on

Alongside other European powers, the UK is helping to supercharge Saudi Arabiaโ€™s attempt to hijack the global sustainability agenda.

Alongside other European powers, the UK is helping to supercharge Saudi Arabiaโ€™s attempt to hijack the global sustainability agenda.