Rail Safety Report Card: Only 225 Of Over 100,000 Unsafe Tank Cars Were Retrofitted in First Year

mikulka color
on

A year ago, when Federal regulators announced new rules for โ€œhigh hazardโ€ trains moving crude oil and ethanol, the oil industry protested that the rules were too strict. The main point of contention made by the American Petroleum Institute (API) was that the requirement to retrofit the unsafe DOT-111 and DOT-1232 tank cars within ten years did not allow enough time to get the jobย done.

Meanwhile, according to information recently provided to DeSmog by the Association of American Railroads, only 225 of the tank cars have been retrofitted in the past year. So, the API may have been onto something because at that rate it will take roughly 500 years to retrofit the entire fleet of DOT-111s and CPC-1232s based on government and industry estimates of fleet size of approximatelyย 110,000.

As DeSmog reported earlier this year, the FAST Act transportation bill that passed in 2015 required that all DOT-111s that have not been retrofitted be retired from crude oil service by 2018. But the bill included the option that โ€œThe Secretary may extend the deadlinesโ€ฆif the Secretary determines that insufficient retrofitting shop capacity will prevent the phase-out of tankย cars.โ€

However, prior to the new rule being finalized, Greg Saxton โ€” a representative of leading tank car manufacturer Greenbrier โ€”ย testified in Congress that there was sufficient shop capacity to meet the timeline noting that,โ€œThis is an aggressive timeline, we believe it isย achievable.โ€

Saxton also made the assertion that the lack of new regulations was the issue that was delaying the safety retrofits.ย ย ย 

โ€œThe only thing holding the industry back is the governmentโ€™s inaction on proposed new tank car design standards and a deadline for having an upgraded rail tank carย fleet.โ€

Now a year after the new rule was announced, with a mere 225 cars undergoing the safety upgrades, it would appear that was not the only thing holding back theย industry.

DeSmog reached out to the Railway Supply Institute, leading oil-by-rail carrier BNSF, and Greenbrier to inquire about the lack of retrofits to date and asked if shop capacity was an issue, but did not receive any response. The Association of American Railroads and the Federal Railroad Administration were unable to provide information on shopย capacity.

Unlike Safety, Public Relations Onย Schedule

Despite not actually making any significant safety improvements to the unsafe DOT-111 tank cars โ€” tank cars called an โ€œunacceptable public riskโ€ by a member of the National Transportation Safety Board โ€” the public relations effort to push the idea that the issue has been addressed appears to beย successful.

In an article publishedย in Chicago Magazineย in April 2016,ย the risks of oil-by-rail were covered in detail. However, that article included the following statement, โ€œThose first-generation tank cars, called DOT-111s, have almost all been subjected to new protections, including having their shells reinforced with steel a sixteenth of an inch thicker than used in earlier models.โ€ย ย 

But 225 tanker cars clearly does not qualify as โ€œalmost allโ€ of the DOT-111 oil tank carย fleet.

An article published shortly after the FAST Act was signed ran with the headline, โ€œNew Highway Bill Includes Tough Rules for Oil Trains.โ€ Again, this would seem like overstating the reality of what the billย included.

As DeSmog has noted before, the oil and rail industries are very good at public relations when it concerns this topic. However, as when BNSF said they were buying 5,000 new tank cars that would exceed all safety standards, it often never results in anything more than a press release and some media coverage. BNSF never purchased the 5,000 tankย cars.

Unsafe Tank Cars Can Carry More Oil and Bring Higherย Profits

In January, Christopher A. Hart, the head of the National Transportation Safety Board, presented his remarks on the NTSBโ€™s safety โ€œMost Wanted Listโ€ and once again mentioned the risk of the DOT-111s in moving crude oil.

โ€œWe have been lucky thus far that derailments involving flammable liquids in America have not yet occurred in a populated area,โ€ Hart said. โ€œBut an American version of Lac-Megantic could happen at anyย time.โ€

Why would the industry want to take this risk? Could it be because unsafe cars are more profitable?ย ย 

The more oil a tank car can haul, the more profitable that oil train will be. The way rail works is that the weight of the car plus the weight of the cargo can only combine to be a certain amount. If your tank car weighs less, you can put in more oil because it effectively has moreย capacity.

Exxon made this case to regulators prior to the rulemaking. Check out this slide the company presented that points out that adding safety measures โ€œreduces capacityโ€ โ€” which reducesย profit.

Tank cars full of volatile Bakken crude oil โ€”ย deemed an โ€œunacceptable public riskโ€ by an NTSB member โ€” continue to move through communities across North America. And the tank car owners are not moving to make the required safetyย retrofits.

While oil-by-rail traffic is declining with the current low oil prices, that is unlikely to continue. And with the lack of pipeline infrastructure needed to move dilbit from ever-increasing tar sands oil production, industry opinion holds that rail has a good chance of making a comeback. And they are going to need rail cars to move thatย oil.

The question remains: Will the Secretary of the Department of Transportation use the loophole in the FAST Act to grant the industry an extension on using DOT-111s pastย 2018?

If history is any indication, with rail safety improvements such as positive train control being repeatedly delayed for decades โ€” including a recent three-year extension by Congress โ€” it would appear that is a likely outcome if the DOT-111s are needed by the oilย industry.

This makes the prediction by the head of the NTSB that โ€œan American version of Lac-Megantic could happen at any timeโ€ all the more likely to eventually occur.
ย 

Blog Image Credit: Justinย Mikulka

mikulka color
Justin Mikulka is a research fellow at New Consensus. Prior to joining New Consensus in October 2021, Justin reported for DeSmog, where he began in 2014. Justin has a degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Cornell University.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.