Green PR Firm EnviroIssues Secretly Working For Oil And Petrochemical Industry

authordefault
on

This is a guest post by Eric de Place and Nick Abraham, originally published by The Sightline Institute as part of their series Look Who’s Taking Oil and Coal Money.ย 

Consulting firm EnviroIssues is a longstanding fixture of the Northwestโ€™s sustainability community. Known mostly for its work with local governments, the company is generally well respected and considered โ€œa white hatโ€ in a fieldย liberally populatedย withย unscrupulous characters. Of themselves,ย EnviroIssues says: โ€œOur names says it allโ€”we help make the natural and built communities where we live, work, and play better places by tackling some of the thorniest public policy and environmental issues of ourย day.โ€

Unfortunately, EnviroIssuesโ€™ green reputation is undeserved. The firm in fact works for several controversial oil and petrochemical companies, shepherding them through the environmental reviews that communities and decision makers depend on to assess projectsโ€™ local impacts. These include the highly controversial Tacoma methanol proposal and major oil-by-rail projects at Vancouver and Grays Harbor,ย Washington.

Whatโ€™s more, Sightlineโ€™s research uncovered a troubling pattern of potential conflicts of interest. The firmโ€™s unusual access to government agencies could allow it to grease the skids for some of the Northwestโ€™s most controversial fossil fuelย projects.

Petrochemicals on Pugetย Sound

The first serious stirrings of discontent with EnviroIssues emerged in Tacoma, where the firm was backing a now-defunct proposal to build the worldโ€™s largest methanol refineryโ€”a project that had fast become enormously unpopular with local residentsโ€”along with two companion refinery proposals on the Columbia River, which are still advancing. The Chinese government-led project at Tacoma would have refined huge quantities of fracked natural gas into methanol and thenย shipped the petrochemical through Puget Soundย to China, where it would be used to manufacture plastics. (Methanol may also be used in China as a fuel for cars andย trucks.)

Although the precise nature of EnviroIssuesโ€™ contractual agreement is murky, the firm clearly handles at least communications and public relations for Northwest Innovation Works, the backer of the methanol projects. EnviroIssues Senior Associate Charla Skaggs, whoย has been with the firm since 2012, has been quoted as a spokesperson for Northwest Innovation Works on numerous occasions. In February 2015,ย she fielded questions from theย Portland Tribuneย about the methanol refinery proposal in Kalama, Washington. In November 2015, sheย spoke with theย Tacoma News Tribune, emphasizing the projectโ€™s environmental benefits. In February 2016, after the project backers had asked to pause the environmental review process for the Tacoma facility (but before they actually withdrew the proposal) in the face of increasingly heated opposition,ย Skaggs was again quoted in the press, saying the company would โ€œcontinue to engage theย community.โ€

Oil trains on the Columbiaย River

EnviroIssues is also promoting huge oil industry projects. In Vancouver, Washington, EnviroIssues has partnered with Tesoro, a Texas-based oil company withย an egregious history of labor and environmental violationsand a reputation for spending big onย right-wing politics in the Northwest. Though you wonโ€™t find Tesoroโ€™s name among theย list of clientsย on EnviroIssuesโ€™ website, the Vancouver project is enormouslyย consequential.

Tesoro aims to build the largest rail-to-ship oil terminal in North America on the banks of the Columbia River near downtown Vancouver. The proposal to move 360,000 barrels of a notoriously dangerous type of crude oil through town every day is easily one of the most contentious fossil fuel projects in the region, detested by theย environmental community,ย dock workers,ย local business owners, and many others. Yet EnviroIssues has supported Tesoroโ€™s oil shipment ambitions from theย beginning.

EnviroIssues Associate Ray Outlaw wasย listed as the primary media contact on Tesoroโ€™s press releaseย announcing the venture in April 2013. As recently as May 2015, an investigation byย theย Columbianย newspaper identified EnviroIssuesย as โ€œa company hired by the Tesoro-Savage joint venture for public relations purposes.โ€ According to this same investigation, EnviroIssues was so integral to the projectโ€™s process that during initial negotiations, the Port of Vancouver reported to EnviroIssues conversations it had with local environmentalย groups.

Oil trains at Graysย Harbor

EnviroIssuesโ€™ oil train work is not limited to the Columbia River. The firm has also represented at least one oil-by-rail project in Hoquiam, Washington, on the shores of Grays Harbor. EnviroIssues provided services to US Development in its plans to build a facility that would have unloaded 45,000 barrels of oil per day, brought in onย notoriously rickety railroad tracksย and then shipped out of the harbor. Notably, the facility would have been sited onย an ecologically sensitiveย andย economically criticalย section of Washingtonโ€™s coast that isย largely unprepared to deal with a spill. The Quinault Indian Nation, local fishermen, the statewide environmental community, and others oppose US Developmentโ€™s oil-by-railย proposal.

EnviroIssues has worked in support of the oil project at Grays Harbor since at least 2013Description: weet This

Despite community opposition, EnviroIssues has worked in support of the oil project at Grays Harbor since at least 2013. Senior associate with the firm Charla Skaggs was acting as the projectโ€™s lead spokesperson when she was asked about the Lac-Megantic oil train disaster that killed 47 people and leveled several blocks of that small Canadian town.ย She told the local Grays Harbor newspaper, โ€œI think once the details are known, once the cause is known, I think the entire industry will be looking at that and saying โ€˜how can we prevent this from ever happening again.โ€™โ€ She spoke to the press on behalf of the company numerous times during 2013 and 2014, including quotes with the localย Daily Worldย newspaper and theย Olympian, touting US Developmentโ€™s safety record.

Even with EnviroIssuesโ€™ network and its experience pushing controversial projects, the Grays Harbor oil-by-rail proposal flopped. In March 2016,ย US Development stopped renewing its โ€œoption-to-leaseโ€ agreement with the Port, effectively killing theย project.

Conflict of interest in Skagitย County?

EnviroIssuesโ€™ย public client listย reads like a roster of local governments, permitting agencies, and environmental organizations. Yet the firmโ€™s allegiances at times appearย suspect.

Consider EnviroIssuesโ€™ relationship with Tesoro, the oil company that pays the firm to advocate for a large oil-by-rail facility in Vancouver. Yet at the same time, EnviroIssues is also charged withย overseeing the publicโ€™s review process for a separate Tesoro proposal, anย oil refinery developmentย at Anacortes, Washington, in Skagit County. That project would allow Tesoro to produce 15,000 barrels per day of xylene (a petrochemical used to make plastics) and ship it through the Salish Sea to Asia. According to Skagit Countyโ€™s Department of Planning, EnviroIssues is supposed to act on behalf of Skagit County,ย gathering and vetting criticisms of Tesoroโ€™s projectย and explaining to the publicย the risks and benefits of the project.

Sightline was unable to identify any instance where EnviroIssues has disclosed that it takes money from the same company it has been hired to evaluate on behalf of Skagitย County.

Conflicting allegiances inย Tacoma?

A similar dynamic seems to have been at work in Tacoma, where EnviroIssues was working for the proponents of the methanol refinery. On October 12, 2015, the Washington Department of Ecology sent emails to several government agencies, including the City of Tacoma, to begin conferring responsibility for the facilityโ€™s public review process. Ecology officially transferred authority to Tacomaย on Novemberย 18.

Yet according to City contract bid results, Tacoma was paying EnviroIssues for work on an unrelated project at least as late as August 2015. And in September 2015, the city brought the firm on to helpย develop the Cityโ€™s Sustainable Action Plan. (One member of the Action Planโ€™s Committee, the Sustainable Tacoma Commission,ย resigned over lack of transparency for the methanol projectโ€™s process.) In other words, EnviroIssues was either working both for the methanol project backers and the projectโ€™s overseeing government agency simultaneously, or at most, a few weeks passed between its work for the two entities. Although working for both entities may not constitute a legal conflict of interest, it does raise questions about EnviroIssuesโ€™ unusual degree of access to decisionย makers.

EnviroIssues had also previouslyย worked with the Port of Tacoma, the agency that was leasing land for the methanol refinery and that would have been central to the permitting process for building theย facility.

Other conflictingย allegiances

EnviroIssues has several other relationships that should call its client loyalties into question.ย The firm has worked with the Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council, the high-level agency that will decide the fate of Tesoroโ€™s oil-by-rail project in Vancouver, for which EnviroIssues provides PR.

Or consider Grays Harbor, where an EnviroIssues staffer was quoted as spokesperson forย US Developmentโ€™s oil train projectย just 26 days after the firm ran an unrelated meeting for theย Washington Department of Ecology. Yet Ecology was the permitting agency tasked with reviewing US Developmentโ€™s proposal. And EnviroIssues is currently a member of Ecologyโ€™sย Water Quality Partnerships, an affiliation that highlights the firmโ€™s continued close relationship with regulators. EnviroIssues is also aconsultant for the Grays Harborย Chamber of Commerce and Economic Developmentย Council.

These incongruous relationships should raise eyebrows, not least among the firmโ€™s clients.ย EnviroIssues boasts as its founding beliefย โ€œthat it was not only possible but absolutely critical to effectively engage the public in conversations about the policies and projects that would change their everyday lives.โ€ Yet the firmโ€™s work for the oil and petrochemical industries in some of the Northwestโ€™s most consequential projects should make members of the public skeptical about the firmโ€™s ability to be an honest broker of conversations with the communities that would bear the public health and safety, financial, and environmental impacts of theseย projects.

EnviroIssues has groomed its green reputation, touting aย long listย of environmentally focused clients while omitting its less savory partnerships. The firm is as well connected as any PR shop could hope to be. Have the local governments, permitting agencies, environmental groups, and others who have sought out the companyโ€™s guidance known about its work for fossil fuelย companies?

Clients considering hiring the firm would do well to consider the tangled web that EnviroIssues has woven in the Northwest.
ย 

Image credit: Derailed Bakken oil train byย EcologyWA via Flickr CCย 

authordefault

Related Posts

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.