How Much Are Fossil Fuel Interests Spending to Sway Your Vote for Congress?

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
on

Are your Congressional representatives up for reelection this year? How much money have they taken from fossil fuelย interests this election cycle? And what about their opponents โ€” are they any better, or are they taking dirty energy money too?

If you donโ€™t know the answers to these questions, you might want to head on over to NoFossilFuelMoney.org, a new online tool created by ClimateTruth Action to track contributions from the fossil fuelย sector โ€” which includes oil and gas companies, electric utilities, coal mining companies, and related businesses โ€” to both congressional incumbents andย challengers.

Using up-to-date campaign finance data, ClimateTruth.org Action has found that House and Senate candidates have so far received $29.6 million in contributions from fossil fuelย interests.

โ€œThe majority of Americans agree itโ€™s time to take action on climate,โ€ said Brant Olson, director of ClimateTruth.org Action. โ€œYet Congress fails to act. Itโ€™s time to buck this trend, and the first step is for voters to know who is buying their politicians.โ€

Not only has Congress failed to pass meaningful legislation to address climate change, but at times it has been openly hostile to the veryย idea.

Take, for instance, Rep. Lamar Smith, the Republican who serves as Chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space, andย Technology.

In some kindย of personal crusade this year, Rep. Smith has usedย his position to harass environmental groups, two state attorneys general, and even the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)ย for their effortsย to hold ExxonMobilย accountable for its role in misrepresenting to the public and stakeholdersย the outsized contribution of fossil fuels toย global warming. Exxon has a history of fundingย climate denial groupsย despite the companyโ€™s extensive internal research supporting the science of climate change.ย 

Rep. Smith also publicly sparred with the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration last year over a study that debunked a favorite canard of climate deniers โ€” namely, that there has been a pause or slowdown in global warming in recent years.

Not surprisingly, Rep. Smith has deep financial ties to fossil fuelย companies, including Exxon. But heโ€™s hardly alone: Of the $29.6 million given to Congressional candidates by fossil fuelย interests in the 2016 election cycle, $29.1 million has gone to incumbents.

In fact, every incumbent senator running for reelection this year has received some cash from fossil fuel interests, according to NoFossilFuelMoney.org.

And about $1.1 million has gone to incumbents who serve alongside Rep. Lamar Smith on the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: $243,000 to the 16 Democrats on the committee, $913,000 to the 22 Republicans (many of whom are working with Rep. Smith to obstruct the investigations byย state attorneys general and the SECย into ExxonMobilโ€™s climate fraud).

The team behind NoFossilFuelMoney.org discovered that the top recipient of fossil fuel money running for the Senate is Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), who has recevied $1,103,551. Meanwhile, the top recipientย running for the House is Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisconsin), who has taken $1,016,260.

โ€œFossil fuel companies are buying our elections and selling out the planet,โ€ Olson said. โ€œThis data shows fossil fuel companies are investing heavily in the status quo. They are betting big on incumbents to maintain a Congress thatโ€™s friendly to dirty energy, and in the process robbing the American people of clean energy jobs and a safe climate future.โ€


Top 15 Congressional candidates receiving money from fossil fuel interests in 2016. Chart via NoFossilFuelMoney.org. ย 

Featured Image Credit: Publicย Domain

picture-14309-1371183830.jpg
Mike Gaworecki is a San Francisco-based journalist who writes about energy, climate, and forest issues for DeSmogBlog and Mongabay.com. His writing has appeared on BillMoyers.com, Alternet, Treehugger, Change.org, Huffington Post, and more. He is also a novelist whose debut โ€œThe Mysticistโ€ came out via FreemadeSF inย 2014.

Related Posts

on

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.

DeSmog estimates raise questions over climate benefits as EU officials consider whether the technology should qualify for billions of euros in subsidies.
Analysis
on

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.

Experts accuse Farageโ€™s party of a โ€˜deliberate campaign of misinformation about climate changeโ€™ in the House of Commons.
on

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.

A Conservative peer and former UK trade advisor were among those who spoke at the summit.
on

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.

All Conservative appointees to the Board of Trade have been binned by the new Labour government.