On the doorstep of Yellowstone National Park, an area known internationally for its abundant wildlife and spectacular scenery, a Vancouver-based junior mining exploration company is causing community ructions over its plan to search for gold at Emigrant Gulch, a fragile ecosystem about four kilometres from the Yellowstone River and 24 kilometres from the parkย boundary.
Lucky Minerals Inc., a company that lists only the Montana proposal in its financial statements, wants to drill up to 46 core holes on privately-owned land to assess gold, copper, silver and molybdenum deposits in an area where there has been mining in the streambed since theย 1880s.
If the results are positive and permits are issued, the company will look for investment to construct an underground mine, which could be in operation in 10 to 15 years, Shawn Dykes, Lucky vice-president, said in anย interview.
But the proposal has brought overwhelming opposition from residents who are concerned about both the environmental effects and the companyโs finances, which they fear are not solid enough to ensure the area isย remediated.
โLucky Minerals doesnโt appear to have the money to conduct the exploration theyโre proposing, let alone the reclamation,โ said Beth Kampschror of the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, after combing through company reports showing that on June 30 the companyโs cash balance wasย $123,838.
A note by the auditors points out that the company will need additional capital to finance ongoingย exploration.
โThe company has limited financial resources, has no source of operating income and has no assurance that additional funding will be available to it for further exploration and development of its projects,โ says theย report.
Map of mining claims and leases acquired by Lucky Minerals in Emigrant Gulch, Montana. Emigrant Peak is in the clouds to the background right. Credit: Williamย Campbell.
The cost of filling in the core holes could be about $11,000 for each hole, according to estimates by Montanaโs Department of Environmental Quality โ which means the company does not have the cash on hand to do the necessary work, said Liz Purdy of Greater Yellowstoneย Coalition.
But the financial concerns are dismissed by Dykes who said the holes will be filled with cement at a cost of about $2,000 each, and the work will be done to the satisfaction of the Department of Environmental Quality and the Forestย Service.
โWe will make sure the bats are happy and the frogs are happy and no one can go in and kill themselves,โ heย said.
It is not unusual for junior exploration companies to have limited available cash, Dykesย said.
โExploration companies never have money because they are always spending it. We go to investors, who invest in the stock and then we go and spend it and then thereโs no money left,โ heย said.
The Montana Department of Environmental Quality, in a draft environmental assessment has concluded that, with mitigation, environmental impacts from the exploration will not be significant and has sent the proposal for a 60-day public comment period, ending Decemberย 12.
All comments will be taken into account and a decision is likely to be several months away, said public policy director Kristiย Ponozzo.
Although there has been a history of companies failing to live up to reclamation requirements, there is now strong bonding legislation and it is strictly enforced, Ponozzoย said.
โBefore they can do any exploration they have to post their bond. If they canโt post their bond they canโt do any exploration,โ sheย said.
Opposition to the plan is coming from a wide swath of Paradise Valley residents including the Yellowstone Gateway Business Coalition, which describes itself as a pro-business, pro-property rights group โrepresenting thousands of hardworking employees and theirย families.โ
โWhile not anti-mining, we recognize not all mining is created equal. Our gateway communities โ surrounding Yellowstone โ are no place for sulphide gold mines,โ says a statement from the group, which is distributing lawn signs saying โYellowstone is more valuable thanย gold.โ
If the natural beauty of the area is compromised, the tourism-based economy will also collapse, say business owners and residents, who are skeptical about claims that a mine would bring prosperity to theย area.
โThe economic gain is going to be so compressed, itโs going to be like a gold rush, short and fast with a massive amount of damage and it will be gone,โ said Colin Davis, owner of Chico Hot Springs Resort and Spa, in a video prepared for the businessย coalition.
The area has a history of companies arriving, deciding the profit is not high enough and leaving without cleaning up, says Bryan Wells, owner of Emigrant Creekย Cabins.
โThese mining companies have come here over the years and they have made all sorts of promises โ everything they are going to do for the community,โ Wellsย said.
โWhen things donโt pan out they get amnesia and forget all about the promises they have made and they leave โ and they leave a mess,โ heย said.
According to Dykes those problems occurred in the bad old days when rules were not enforced and companies walked away from theirย responsibilities.
โYou canโt do that today,โ heย said.
Those fighting against the mine scored a victory this week when U.S Department of Interior Secretary Sally Jewell and Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack recognized the importance of protecting the gateway to Yellowstone with a two-year moratorium on gold exploration on public lands in theย area.
The business coalition and environmental groups hope the time-out on mining, will turn into a legislated mining ban on the 30,000 acres of public land included in theย moratorium.
โTodayโs decision buys the community and the Congressional delegation time to discuss and consider the prospect of a longer-term solution,โ said Theresa Pierno, National Parks Conservation Associationย president.
โWe call for a full science-backed review of the resources at stake on these lands and the permanent protection of this pricelessย landscape.โ
Although the Lucky Minerals exploration would take place on private land and would not be affected by the moratorium, the original proposal included exploration on public land. That application was withdrawn because the study would have taken two years, but there are hopes it could be revived in the future, Dykesย said.
Another application, by a different company, for exploration in an area closer to the Yellowstone Park entrance is on hold because proponents have not yet provided enoughย information.
Although the moratorium does not affect the private land proposal, it sends a message on the importance of the area, both to wildlife and the localย economy.
โMining in Yellowstoneโs gateway not only threatens our jobs and our quality of life. If developed, these mines would industrialize critical habitat for grizzly bears, cut off migratory corridors for elk and risk poisoning the Yellowstone River with acid runoff,โ said Michelle Uberuaga, Park County Environmental Society executiveย director.
Vancouver Company At Centre of Gold-Mining Controversy on Edge of #Yellowstone National Park https://t.co/2hoVvmdZur #bcpoli #cdnpoli #YVR
โ DeSmog Canada (@DeSmogCanada) November 23, 2016
The political battle to protect the area from mining has been led by Montana Senator Jon Tester, a Democrat and it is not yet known how the Donald Trump administration will view the push for protectiveย legislation.
Tester, in a letter to the federal government, sent before Mondayโs moratorium announcement, said mining is not appropriate near the entrance to Montanaโs first nationalย park.
โThe local economy in the Paradise Valley and Gardiner Basin is diverse and thriving due to the quality of life, opportunities for world-class fishing and other outdoor recreation, and the millions of visitors that Yellowstone draws through these communities every year. The prospect of large-scale mining operations threatens the unique nature of this area and the livelihoods of the people who live there,โ heย wrote.
The broad community concern about the mining proposals should send a strong message to whoever is in charge politically, said Jenny Harbine, Earthjustice staff attorney, pointing to devastating environmental impacts from other Montanaย mines.
โThis is a project that threatens our way of life,โ sheย said.
It is also troubling that representatives of Lucky Minerals have been entirely absent from the community, Harbineย said.
โIn other areas at least the company showed up,โ sheย said.
The community has every right to be nervous, said Ugo Lapointe, MiningWatch Canada programย coordinator.
โGenerally speaking, impacted communities should always be wary of small, penny-stock companies, with little or no financial capacity, as they canโt afford best environmental and social practices โ let alone even respect environmental regulations,โ heย said.
โIn other words, we find repeatedly in our work that there is a strong correlation between increased socio-environmental risks and corporate financialย risks.โ
Canadian mining companies have come under increased scrutiny since the tailings dam at Mount Polley collapsed in 2014 sending 24-million cubic metres of waste and sludge flooding into nearby lakes andย rivers.
Main image: Chico Hots Springs Resort in foreground with Emigrant Peak and Emigrant Gulch proposed mining area behind the locally owned world famous resort. Aerial flight by Bruce Gordon-EcoFlight. Photo by Williamย Campbell.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to date with DeSmog news and alerts