Exxon, Peabody Coal Lobby for Bill Poised to Load EPA Science Board With Polluters

picture-7018-1583982147.png
on

A bill which would prohibit scientists who had received research grants from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from serving on its Science Advisory Board (SAB) and potentially welcome more industry and corporate representatives to the board has passed through the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, andย Technology.

The SAB is an independent council charged with reviewing the science EPA uses as the foundation for regulations, in addition to providing other scientific advice and expertise. Congressional Republicans have been taking aim at changing how SAB members are chosen for several years. The bill was first introduced in 2014,ย re-introduced again in 2015, and has taken itsย latest form asย H.R.1431.ย 

Critics of the bill say it will give a seat at the table to corporate executives who would benefit from weakening EPA regulations and shut the door to many qualifiedย researchers. And it has powerful corporations pushing it, including coal giant Peabody Energy, ExxonMobil, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and others, according to lobbying disclosure forms reviewed byย DeSmog.

Committee Chairmanย Rep.ย Lamar Smith (R-TX)ย says the billย โ€œallows for increased public participation in the EPA science review process and requires the SAB to be more responsive to the public and to Congress.โ€ Smith has receivedย $24,770 in campaign donations from ExxonMobil since 1999, according to Oil Change International, and has served as a leading force against the โ€œExxon Knewโ€ climate change investigations pursued by state attorneysย general.

Lining up to oppose H.R.1431: several environmental groups, such the National Wildlife Federation, League of Conservation Voters, Earthjustice, and Natural Resources Defense Council, as well as scientific societies, health advocacy groups, and universities, including theย American Thoracic Society, the Trust for America’s Health, and Cornell University.ย 

Peabody’s lobbying effort has been led by former Sen. Tim Hutchinson (R-AR), former Rep. Albert Wynn (D-MD), and former chief of staff to Sen. Wendell Ford (R-MI),ย Robertย Mangas. Exxon’sย campaign in support ofย the bill is led by veteran lobbyist Jamie Conrad.ย 

A Koch Industries-affiliated group, the American Forest andย Paper Association (AFPA),ย has also lobbied for passage of the bill. Koch subsidiary Georgia Pacific is a dues-paying member of AFPA and its director, Paul Noe โ€” AFPA‘s Vice President for Public Policyย โ€” is under consideration to head up the powerful White House Office of Information and Regulatoryย Affairs.

โ€œLessย Scientificโ€

While the bill has many proponents generally tied to corporate America, it also has its fair share ofย critics.

โ€œThe independence of the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) and its ability to continue its work with the caliber of experts it currently employs would be seriously jeopardized by this proposal,โ€ wrote Genna Reed, a science and policy analyst for the Union of Concerned Scientists, in a March 8 blog post onย theย bill.

โ€œThis is simply a way to deter academic scientists from pursuing a slot on the SAB, opening up opportunities for industry interests who would never be in need of government funding to join theย Board.โ€

Members of the EPA advisory boardย with affiliations to corporate interests are already allowed to serve, as long as they receive a waiver from theย EPA Office of General Counsel’s Ethics Office. John Deutch, who sat on the board of directors for gas-exporting company Cheniere, was given such a clearance by the Obama administration.

The bill, Reed further detailed, has language explainingย that those with such financial ties to private industryย are โ€œnot excludedโ€ from being on the board, meaning a conflicts-of-interest checkย would no longer exist. Formerย Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ), who now heads up theย American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), decried the bill during a Februaryย hearing.

โ€œThat is a science advisory board โ€” it will not function better by having fewer scientists on it. It is supposed to look at science. But in the name of balance and diversity, thereโ€™s an effort to make it, well โ€ฆ less scientific,โ€ saidย Holt.

Given these dynamics, perhaps it’s not so shocking that many funders of the climate change denial machine, like Peabody and Exxon, have rallied behind suchย legislation.

Main image credit:ย Heidelberger Life-Science Lab,ย CC BYSAย 3.0

picture-7018-1583982147.png
Steve Horn is the owner of the consultancy Horn Communications & Research Services, which provides public relations, content writing, and investigative research work products to a wide range of nonprofit and for-profit clients across the world. He is an investigative reporter on the climate beat for over a decade and former Research Fellow for DeSmog.

Related Posts

on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.
on

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.