In Dramatic Shift, Kentucky Voters Potentially Becoming Numb to Politicians Talking About Coal Jobs

authordefault
on

For years, Republican politicians campaigning in the state of Kentucky have used the fictitious โ€œwar on coalโ€ talking point to gain support from voters. From Senator Mitch McConnell who has represented the state in the U.S. Senate for 32 years, to President Donald Trump, the generally accepted rule has been that talking about the importance of coal and coal jobs, while attacking environmental safety standards that put a โ€œburdenโ€ on the coal industry, is the key to winning in the state ofย Kentucky.

But if new reports are to be believed, that conventional wisdom about running a campaign on coal could be suffering the same fate as the coal industryย itself.

Research from the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication shows that a majority of voters in Kentucky understand that climate change is not only real, but that something must be done about the problem. And, almost as importantly, they now understand that those coal jobs that politicians like Trump and McConnell promised to bring back will not be returning.

Itโ€™s important to remember that following the 2012 Presidential elections, the coal industry itself admitted that there was no โ€œwar on coalโ€ and that their desire to have politicians push the issue failed miserably. But that never stopped the industry from donating to politicians who were more than willing to push that talking point to energizeย voters.

A recent article in the Courier-Journal explained that the new information from Yaleโ€™s research shows that voters in Kentucky are far from being the anti-environmentalists that their elected officials like to believe they are, but they are often willing to forgo environmental protections in exchange for more economic stability, which is what politicians have beenย promising.

The Courier-Journal spoke to residents in the Appalachian region of Kentucky, and found out that they do care for the environment, but that they are also concerned about their personal finances due to the decline in the industry. One resident interviewed by the Journal pointed out that voters in the state of Kentucky may not sit around and talk about climate change, but they do sit around and laugh about the politicians who deny it and say theyโ€™ll bring back those coalย jobs.

The main issue, according to both the Courier-Journal and the recent Yale study, is in the messaging. Republicans frame the environmental debate as an economic debate in Kentucky, and that tends to resonate in a deeper way with voters. But just because it resonates, that doesnโ€™t mean that voters take it at face value, as the Courier-Journal points out:

When politicians promise to bring Kentucky’s mining jobs back, voters typically don’t take their pledge literally, UK political science professor Stephen Voss said. But they may vote for those candidates because they believe they want to support the coalย industry.

Arguments about federal intrusion on the coal industry have gained traction with Kentucky voters in repeated elections, according to Voss. Coal was a huge campaign issue in 2012 when Republican U.S. Rep. Andy Barr defeated incumbent congressman Ben Chandler, a Democrat who voted for a controversial cap-and-trade bill aimed at reducing carbon emissions, even though their congressional district didn’t have any activeย mines.

In addition to coal’s symbolic power, Voss pointed out that many residents still have a practical stake in that industry. He could imagine political appeals focused on pollution making some headway with voters, though. Voss indicated that an offer to help the state slowly transition toward solar power may be more palatable than telling Kentuckians โ€œwe’re pushing solar energy, goodbye to yourย coal.โ€

The main problem with the Republican talking points about coal jobs is that they still havenโ€™t materialized, and thatโ€™s one of the reasons why Kentucky voters are starting to become numb to that talkingย point.

As Bloomberg has pointed out, the total coal industry jobs in the United States fell to 53,000 in 2015, a 50% decline in just five years. A little over 6,000 of those jobs are in Kentucky, the state that has been hardest-hit by those jobย losses.

Even with coal-friendly politicians representing Appalachia, the region continued to lose jobs, mainly due to the fact that natural gas has taken over a larger share of the market. Renewable energy is also booming in the United States, becoming the fastest-growing energy sector, making those coal jobs a thing of theย past.

To address the combined economic and environmental concerns of voters in places like Kentucky, one of the best routes could be a program like the one proposed by 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. Clinton said during her campaign that if she were elected, she would invest $30 billion into renewable energy training for coal miners in Appalachia, a move that would reduce carbon emissions and help insure well-paying, long-lasting jobs for the people currently employed by a dying industry. If Kentucky politicians were legitimately concerned about the stateโ€™s well-being, they would propose a similar plan that hits on all of the concerns of the voters in theย state.

As we gradual inch closer to the 2018 midterm elections, it will be interesting to see how this new data factors into campaign strategies for Kentucky. Will politicians continue making promises that voters know they canโ€™t keep, or will a politician finally have the courage to propose a major investment into a jobs-training program that could actually put these former coal miners back toย work?

Main image:ย via Pavlofox,ย Pixabay

authordefault

Farron Cousins is the executive editor of The Trial Lawyer magazine, and his articles have appeared on The Huffington Post, Alternet, and The Progressive Magazine. He has worked for the Ring of Fire radio program with hosts Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Mike Papantonio, and Sam Seder since August 2004, and is currently the co-host and producer of the program. He also currently serves as the co-host of Ring of Fire on Free Speech TV, a daily program airing nightly at 8:30pm eastern. Farron received his bachelor's degree in Political Science from the University of West Florida in 2005 and became a member of American MENSA in 2009.ย  Follow him on Twitterย @farronbalanced.

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.

Oil patch advocate Lisa Baiton called for more extraction and less regulation at Vancouver address that didnโ€™t once mention climate change.
on

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.

PA-based CEO Toby Rice hobnobbed with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Now heโ€™s poised for pipelines, exports, and profits.
on

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.

Longtime DeSmog reporter and author of The Petroleum Papers will play a key leadership role as we investigate a global resurgence of climate obstruction.
on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.