Exclusive: UN, EU Agencies Reject Ties to Conference Hijacked by Climate Science Deniers

authordefault
on

On the face of it, the climate science conference scheduled for the romantic Italian city of Rome looks like anyย other.

The organizers, India-based ConferenceSeries, promise their โ€œ4th World Conference on Climate Changeโ€ will attract โ€œworld class expertsโ€ from across theย planet.

Anticipating โ€œmore than 500 participants,โ€ the event claimed to have an organizing committee with representatives from the UNโ€™s World Meteorological Organization (WMO), the European Space Agency, and the European Environment Agency (EEA).

But a DeSmog investigation reveals the event is being hijacked by a group of climate science deniers who have previously claimed they want to investigate climate scientists for fraud and have dismissed human-caused climate change as aย hoax.

Since being contacted by DeSmog, both the WMO and the EEA have issued statements distancing themselves from the three-day conference, scheduled to start on Octoberย 19.

ConferenceSeries, also known as OMICS, promotesย hundreds of meetings around the world and is behind the logistics and promotion for the Italy conference.ย In August 2016 the U.S. governmentโ€™s Federal Trade Commission launched court action against the company, alleging deceptive marketing practices. The case isย ongoing.

Two members of the Italy conference โ€œorganizing committeeโ€ โ€” Nils-Axel Mรถrner and Franco Maranzana โ€” were also organizers of a meeting for climate science deniers in London in September 2016.

Both are also founding members of a self-styled Independent Committee on Geoethics (ICG) โ€” a group that, according to another founder Lord Christopher Monckton, was established to investigate climate scientistsย forย fraud.ย ย 

Seven presenters, including Monckton andย Mรถrner, and one organizer of that London meeting, Maranzana, are also scheduled to speak at the Romeย event.ย 

Some scientists listed as attending โ€” or even organizingย โ€”ย the Italy conference have told DeSmog their names โ€œshould not be on theย program.โ€

After being contacted by DeSmog, OMICS said it would โ€œinvestigateโ€ the line-up for itsย conference and if it found โ€œunnecessary science,โ€ it would contact attendeesย to inform them โ€œabout the real faces of those who are looking to make a platform for spreading the nonsense through ourย forum.โ€

In 2016, Australia Nobel science winner Professor Peter Doherty pulled out of a conference after discovering OMICS was the organizer, saying: โ€œI will not speak at this, or any future meeting that youย organize.โ€

Dawn ofย Truth?

Mรถrner and Maranzana’s London meeting of deniers, subtitled the โ€œDawn of Truth,โ€ was forced to move venues when University College London canceled the booking after discovering who was behind theย event.

ICGโ€™s founding statement declares thatย โ€œpersonal attacks have no place in science.โ€ ย Yet outside the London conference, Lord Monckton, who has called young climate change campaignersย โ€œthe Hitler youth,โ€ย described British physicist Professor Brian Cox as a โ€œsad and contemptible figure,โ€ โ€œincompetent,โ€ and a โ€œfashionableย pseudo-scientist.โ€

At the London conference, Mรถrner gave a presentation claiming a one meter (roughly one yard) rise in sea levelsย by the end of this century was โ€œimpossibleโ€ and that sea levels may only rise by 15 centimeters (5.9ย inches).ย 

However, many scientists now fear that a one meter rise in global sea level, which would put trillions of dollars of coastal infrastructure at risk, could be anย underestimate.

On multiple occasions on the ConferenceSeries website, Mรถrnerโ€™s affiliation is given as Stockholm University, and he is described as an Emeritus Professor.

But a spokesperson for Stockholm University told DeSmog that Mรถrner had โ€œno affiliation of Emeritus Professorโ€ and that Mรถrner had retired from the university in Marchย 2005.

Mรถrner is known for dismissing the science linking rising sea levels to greenhouse gas emissions, but his methods and claims have beenย debunked.ย 

Dr. John Churchย of the University of New South Wales Climate Change Research Center told DeSmog Mรถrnerโ€™s work was โ€œtotally discreditedโ€ and that he had no record โ€œof publishing high qualityย papers.โ€

Church is a world-leading expert on sea level rise, with his research appearing in the globe’s topย scientific journals. He has been a co-convening lead author on chapters covering sea level riseย in twoย UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)ย reports.

Maranzanaโ€™s affiliation is given as โ€œStratex Djiboutiโ€ โ€” a mining company based in the UK.

NASAย Speaker?

Also a speaker at the London event and scheduled to appear in Italy is Thomas Wysmuller, a member of the ICG advisoryย committee.ย 

On the Italy conference program, Wysmullerโ€™s affiliation is listed as โ€œNASA TRCS Climate Group,โ€ which could be easily mistaken as a legitimate group at the U.S. spaceย agency.

In fact, the letters โ€œTRCSโ€ stand for The Real Climate Stuff and is a group of retired NASA employees who reject the risk of human-caused climateย change.

Other speakers linked to 2016’sย London conference and also listed to appear in Rome are Nicola Scafetta of Italy, Albrecht Glatzle of Paraguay, Jan-Erik Solheim of Norway, and Fabio Pistella ofย Italy.

Mรถrner, Solheim, and Glatzle also attended the 2016 UN climate talks in Marrakech as a group. One climate science denial website quoted Glatzle as supporting President Donald Trumpโ€™s plans to withdraw from the UN Paris climateย agreement.ย 

Thatย trio, plus Monckton, are also founders of a group known as Clexit, which claims: โ€œThe world must abandon this suicidal Global Warming crusade. Man does not and cannot controlย theย climate.โ€

WMO โ€œNotย Involvedโ€

Some participants listed for the Italy event this fall and contacted by DeSmog said they never confirmed their attendance despite their names and photographs being used on the conferenceย website.

Other participants were unaware of the Federal Trade Commission case against OMICS, the conferenceย managers.

Several people listed as participants and contacted by DeSmog were also unaware they would be sharing a platform with climate scienceย deniers.

Dr. Alexander Baklanov is a scientific officer at the WMO and, for at least a year, was listed as a member of the upcoming Italy conference’s organizing committee as well as that of the previous โ€œ3rd World Conference on Climate Change,โ€ held in Valencia,ย Spain.

After being contacted by DeSmog, WMO issued a statement saying it โ€œis not involved in any way with the so-called Fourth World Conference on Climate Change and wishes to disassociate itself from the conferenceย organizers.โ€

The statement said Dr. Baklanov had once been contacted by the conference organizers and โ€œin good faith, suggested some possible topics for it toย outline.โ€

โ€œThe WMO scientist is not on the organizing committee of the conference as is implied by the organizers. No representative of WMO will attend the conference,โ€ the statementย added.

Dr. Baklanovโ€™s name was removed from the conference website late last week at the request of the WMO, after DeSmog had madeย contact.

The Italy conference website also named an official from the European Environment Agency (EEA), Annemarie Bastrup-Birk, as a member of the organizingย committee.

But Katja Rosenbohm, EEA head of communications, told DeSmog: โ€œThe EEA has no affiliation or role whatsoever with OMICS or the conference they are organizing in Rome. One of our experts’ names was incorrectly posted on their organizing website and it has now beenย removed.

โ€œConference organizers did contact an EEA expert last year about potentially participating in a conference on climate change, however, the expertโ€™s participation was never confirmed and there was never anyย follow-up.โ€

โ€œMy Name Should Not Be on theย Programโ€

One of the highest profile individuals, still listed as a speaker for the Italy conference, is veteran climate scientist Professor Michael Schlesinger of the University ofย Illinois.

Schlesinger told DeSmog he had received an email invitation and had initially offered only to give a lecture by video, but he had heard nothing from the conference organizers since. He had never agreed toย appear.

โ€œMy name should not be on the program,โ€ heย said.

Referring to Lord Monckton and others, Schlesinger said: โ€œWhen I was invited, it did not occur to me that there was going to be these kinds of people on theย program.โ€

The list of conference speakers suggests people will be spending money on flights from China, Canada, U.S., Japan,ย and Russia. Researchers are also listed as attending from Cameroon, Kenya, Azerbaijan,ย andย Bangladesh.

Scientist Paulina Cetina Herediaย of the University of New South Wales in Australiaย told DeSmog she had sent a scientific abstract to the conference, but had never registered and would not beย attending.ย 

Despite this, her name has appeared on several versions of the conference program, and remains there as DeSmog publishes thisย story.

Don Elzer, founder of the Wildcraft Forest School in British Columbia, Canada, said he had not formally registered, but had sent a conference abstract that had been accepted. His name appears on the conference program as aย speaker.

He told DeSmog: โ€œIf in fact climate change deniers are hijacking this conference then a serious imbalance will occur with regards to genuine inquiry and problem solving. We are there to contribute solutions that will help to transition and restore ecosystems and we are seeking partnerships and working collaborations in the field. If there is no audience for collaboration we will not be involved with this conference. If this conference becomes a political platform for a Trump-style denial of climate change, not only will we not attend but also we will actively boycott and criticize such negligentย behavior.โ€

In an information brochure shared on a research page of one member of the organizing committee, a promotional blurb written in broken English states the conference โ€œanticipates more than 500 participants around theย globe.โ€

An email invitation to the conference sent to one climate scientist, seen by DeSmog, also contains oddly strainedย language.

The email reads: โ€œClimate Change 2017 is specifically premeditated with a unifying axiom providing pulpit to widen the imminent scientificย creations.โ€

FTC Case Against OMICS

In August 2016, the U.S.ย Federal Trade Commission launched legal action against ConferenceSeries alleging the company was carrying out deceptive practices related to the way they promoted theirย conferences.

While OMICS and ConferenceSeries are physically located at an address in Hyderabad, India, the company has trading addresses in the United States, including inย Nevada.

ConferenceSeries is owned by Srinubabu Gedela, who also owns the related OMICS journal publishing company that is part of the same FTCย investigation.

The FTC alleges OMICSโ€™s โ€œopen accessโ€ journals have falsely claimed to offer robust peer-review of scientific papers,ย that their journals were part of key scientific benchmarking tools,ย and their journals included particular scientists asย editors.ย 

Gregory Ashe, a senior staff attorney at the FTCโ€™s bureau of consumer protection, told DeSmog the case against OMICS centered on alleged deceptive marketingย practices.

โ€œThis case is not about the content, but is about how they are marketing their services. We are neutral on what the conferences are about,โ€ heย said.

FTC alleges that OMICS claimed scientists were involved in organizing or attending particular conferences, โ€œwhen those organizers or participants did not agree to be an organizer orย participant.โ€

On the back of the OMICS case, the FTC issued an advisory to scientists and researchers to โ€œbewareโ€ of so-called โ€œpredatoryย publishers.โ€

Lawyers representing OMICS have filed a motion to dismiss the charges, brought in the district court of Nevada, and have rejected theย allegations.ย 

OMICS toย โ€œInvestigateโ€

A spokesperson for OMICS wrote a long responseย to DeSmog, claiming โ€œno one can hijack our congressโ€ and that the organizing committee had 20 members โ€œfrom the best institutions in theย world.โ€

But the spokesperson said they were โ€œcompletely unawareโ€ of the discredited views on climate change pushed by several of theย speakers.

โ€œWe would investigate through our panel into this and also from other websites before we can comment on this. Our congress will never encourage for those who wants to spread the unnecessaryย science.โ€

DeSmog asked if OMICS would make efforts to inform people already committed to attending about the views of many of theย speakers.

The spokesperson said: โ€œYes, if we find from our investigation we would certainly alarm the attendees about the real faces of those who are looking to make a platform for spreading the nonsense through our forum. It is not too late to raise our voice and reach every attendee of our congress about those members through emails and phoneย calls.โ€

The spokesperson added: โ€œThe eligibility criteria to serve in our [scientific committee] board includes they should be at least in the rank of Associate Professor, willing to spend time to screen abstracts submitted, should at least have 10 publications in reputed journals and fewย others.โ€

Asked if they stood by their claim of attracting โ€œmore than 500 participants,โ€ the spokesperson added it was โ€œextending free participations for the local universities around Italyโ€ and โ€œwe are sure that we would be reaching the claimed number ofย attendees.โ€

But the spokesperson added: ย โ€œHowever as you are aware of that events industry is unpredictable, there are many factors that would affect the attendance of conference like disease outbreak, terror threat, natural disaster, flights delay, community riots hence it is too early to speak about the attendeesย number.โ€

DeSmog did not receive a response from emails sent to Mรถrner andย Maranzana, two members of the Italy conference organizingย committee.

Main image: A screenshot of Lord Monckton’s presentation to a September 2016 London climate meeting, organized by the Independent Committee on Geoethics. Credit:ย YouTube

Related Posts

on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
Analysis
on

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.

Right wing YouTuber Tim Pool is the latest to own โ€˜climate peopleโ€™ with fake facts spouted by a grizzled TV oilman.
on

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.

Critics say the controversial GWP* method โ€“ which New Zealand appears close to adopting โ€“ is โ€œopen to significant abuseโ€.
on

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.