What do Third Energy's Troubles Mean for UK Fracking?

authordefault
on

This was meant to be the year of frackingโ€™s big push in the UK. But the early months of 2018 have seen the industry beset by delays and controversy yetย again.

The latest obstacle came in the form of the UK governmentโ€™s reluctance to give the go ahead to fracking at a well near Kirby Misperton in North Yorkshire without financialย checks.

Business secretary Greg Clark decided to have Third Energyโ€™s finances assessed before choosing whether or not to approve drilling at the site. The firmโ€™s filing of its accounts was four months overdue before they were finallyย published.

The project was due to be at the vanguard of a fresh wave of fracking in the UK, which would have seen wells fracked for the first time sinceย 2011.

So whatโ€™s the story behind Third Energyโ€™s troubles, and what does it mean for the UKโ€™s burgeoning frackingย industry?

Delay

Third Energy has removed some equipment from its Kirby Misperton site, perhaps signaling it does not expect the green lightย imminently.

A spokesperson for the Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) told DeSmog UK โ€œThere is no set deadline [for approval], itโ€™s an ongoing processโ€ฆ however long it takes to be done properlyโ€. Third Energy stated it expected the process to take โ€œsomeย timeโ€.

Clark has referred Third Energyโ€™s finances to the Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA), a treasury arm, โ€œto assess the financial resilience of the applicant, including its ability to fund decommissioning costsโ€. This extra hoop to getting permission to frack also affects any other projects in the UK, according toย Clark.

This means that the fracking industry is once again left in limbo, without a schedule of what to expect, when it thought it would be able to advance โ€”ย and its reputation again brought underย question.

Since 2012, the government has been pushing fracking as a source of home-grownย energy.

But all is not looking rosy for the industry that canโ€™t quite seem to make it off the ground: An internal, government report massively scaled back expectations of fracking in the UKScotland has banned fracking, after mass public objection to theย technique.ย 

Third Energy had hoped that it could have tested the potential of the well to find out whether it was commercially viable by mid-February. Commercial development and production could take up to three years and depend on further fracking wells, the firmโ€™s director Alan Linn told the Guardian.

Third Energy has already experienced delays at its site near Kirby Misperton. The company had hoped to start tests of hydraulic fracking at the site last year, and stated in early November it was ready to do so. But then in the same month, the government moved to close a loophole in the law – anti-fracking protesters claimed they influenced the decision – with the upshot that Third Energyโ€™s well in North Yorkshire was subject to planning consent approval by BEIS secretary of state, Gregย Clark.

A spokesperson for Third Energy said: โ€œAfter almost four years of planning and preparation, we are delighted that the Secretary of State is satisfied that Third Energy has met all of the thirteen technical requirements set out in section 4A of the Petroleum Actย 1998.

โ€œWe look forward to providing the requested information to the Infrastructure and Projects Authority in order to achieving hydraulic fracturing consent from the Secretary of State for our existing KM8ย well.โ€

The firm has said it hoped operations near Kirby Misperton could cause a โ€œsea change in how the industry is perceivedโ€ around fracking pollution and safety, according to the Guardian. But these now appear to be onย hold.

Conflict ofย Interest?

The firm is also under pressure due to allegations of a conflict of interest regarding one of the companyโ€™s directors relationship with a Treasury body โ€”ย which both the government and Third Energyย deny.

In September last year, Jitesh Gadhia was appointed a senior independent director of Third Energy. He is also the non-executive director of UK Government Investments, a treasury body which looks at government support for ailing businesses. Ghadia is an investment banker, Tory party donor and has sat in the House of Lords sinceย 2016.

A Friends of the Earth spokesperson told DeSmog UK: โ€œThe fact that a Conservative party donor and peer who has executive status within a Treasury body and therefore potential position of influence within both Treasury and Government is a director of a company that is reliant on a favourable report from another Treasury body isโ€ฆan area ofย concern.

โ€œThe decision to go ahead with KM8 [the well near Kirby Misperton] clearly now rests upon that favourable report from the IPA. This is why the relationshipย matters.โ€

The government stated the IPA and UK Government Investments are separate, and there was no basis for suggestions of conflict of interest. Third Energy told the Guardianย that Gadhia had registered all of his interests on the Lordโ€™s register, and โ€œThere is complete transparency and no question of any conflicts ofย interest.โ€

Gadhia has donated over ยฃ200,000 to the Conservative party between 2009-2015, according to Electoral Commission data. He was made a peer by David Cameron in 2016. His Government profile states he โ€œhas over 20 yearsโ€™ investment banking experience, having held senior positions at Blackstone, Barclays Capital, ABN AMRO and Baringย Brothers.โ€

Offshoreย Accounts

Third Energy, which is largely backed by Barclays, said last May that it intended to withdraw its support from Third Energy. The UK subsidiary of Third Energy is controlled by a parent company โ€˜Third Energy Holdingsโ€™ registered in the Cayman Islands, a renowned tax haven that has been โ€œgrey-listedโ€ by the EU.

โ€œThird Energy Holdings and all subsidiary companies are compliant with all UK tax policies and we pay our taxes here in the UK,โ€ aย spokesperson for Third Energy told DeSmog UK, โ€œAs our trade association has already pointed out several weeks ago, people need to be aware of the facts โ€“ all UK profits from oil and gas companies onshore are ring-fenced as part of the tax rules meaning that UK profits are subject to UKย tax.

โ€œThe Corporation Tax for UK onshore oil and gas companies is currently set at 30%, significantly in excess of normal Corporation Tax. In addition, the industry has committed to a substantial payment to local communities based on the revenue it generates. The Government will also ensure that all business rates will go directly to localย councils.โ€

Gadhia has alsoย previously defended offshore investments in the wake of the Paradise Papers scandal. In the Lords in 2017, he said:

โ€œMy Lords, I declare my interests as an investor in a wide range of assets, including offshore investments. Will my noble friend agree that millions of UK savers and pensions, let alone Her Majesty, benefit directly or indirectly from investments held offshore, and to suggest that they are avoiding tax is simply fake and falseย news?

โ€œThose who take the time to properly understand offshore investment vehicles will realise that their underlying purpose is to provide an efficient and predictable umbrella structure to attract the widest possible range of investors from around the world. They are in fact set up to minimise the amount of tax paid within the offshore entity and consequently to maximise the returns flowing back to investors, allowing them to pay tax directly in their ownย countries.โ€

Third Energy UK Gas Limited (the Third Energy subsidiary that owns Yorkshire fracking licences) revealed a loss of ยฃ3.405m in its annual accounts filed inย February.

The documents also stated that firm owed ยฃ48.16m to parent company Third Energy Holdings, which is repayable onย demand.

The directors of Third Energy Holdings said they would not pursue repayment within 12 months of the accounts, leading the UK offshoot to state โ€œthe Company can continue as a going concern, and has the necessary funding available to ensure that it continues to trade on the going concern basis, for the reasonably foreseeableย future.โ€

To find out more about Third Energyโ€™s role in the UKโ€™s fossil fuel industry, see the companyโ€™s full profile on DeSmog UKโ€™s Disinformation Database.

Photo:ย Kirby Misperton Protectionย Camp

Get Weekly News Updates

Related Posts

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.

The EU and many member states have set limits for how much manure farmers are allowed to apply in their fields, but crucial oversight is lacking.
on

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.

Robert Wilkie was speaking at a conference co-hosted by the group behind the radical Project 2025 agenda.
on

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.

Scope of corporate influence underscores concerns the technology will be used to prolong demand for planet-heating natural gas.
on

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.

A 1961 oil and gas well is the suspected source of a geyser eruption in the region where Permian wastewater disposal is causing a flurry of earthquakes.