Climate Science Deniers Have a New Hero and His Name Is Peter Ridd

authordefault
on

Climate science deniers and conservative media have found themselves a new โ€œfree speechโ€ hero โ€” an academic who is suing his own university and thinks the multiple human threats to Australiaโ€™s Great Barrier Reef areย overblown.

Professor Peter Ridd might be a new name to some, but the marine geophysicist has a long association with groups pushing denial of the well-established links between human activity and dangerous climateย change.

Outlets including Breitbart and Fox News have joined a steady flow of columns and interviews across Australiaโ€™s conservative media landscape covering Riddโ€™s case, sometimes handing over space to him in their columnย pages.

Each time, Ridd, of Australia’s James Cook University, has been painted as a bastion of truth pushing back against the establishment. But how does that image hold up toย scrutiny?

Conservative Mediaย Fawning

News Corp Australiaโ€™s political commentator and climate science denier-in-chief Andrew Bolt has been especially enthusiastic, writing multiple blog posts and columns, inviting Ridd onto his Sky News show, and asking other stablemates to comment (News Corp columnist and climate science denier Terry McCrann called for James Cook Universityโ€™s executive to be โ€œsacked immediatelyโ€).

Riddโ€™s case, wrote Bolt, was โ€œnot only about free speech,โ€ but was an issue of โ€œwhether scientific debates are settled by censorship or byย debate.โ€

โ€œA mainstay of Western civilization is on trial here,โ€ added Bolt, with no fear ofย overstatement.

Climate science denier James Delingpole of the hyper-partisan Breitbart wrote that the โ€œgaggedโ€ Professor Ridd had โ€œplenty of solid scientific evidenceโ€ to show the reef was โ€œdoing justย fine.โ€

Examining Ridd’sย Case

So whatโ€™s actually been happening? Another, less hysterical way of looking at the case, isย this.

Ridd has been happily criticizing the science linking dangerous climate change to greenhouse gas emissions, and the science showing the impacts of humans on corals, for more than a decade.

Ridd has also repeatedly, over many years, said that the impact of agricultural runoff and water quality on the health and growth rate of corals isย overstated.

But his employer, James Cook University, initiated its own action against Ridd after he had criticized specific organizations at his own university in media interviews, saying they could not be trusted. This, the university alleged, went against the universityโ€™s code of conduct.

So this is not about Riddโ€™s โ€œfreedomโ€ to say what he wants, but is about an alleged breach of the universityโ€™s code of conduct โ€” whether you agree with that code orย not.

When the university censured Ridd in 2016, he ignored them. He gave an interview in August 2017 to another climate science denier, Alan Jones, on Sky News. Ridd was there to talk about his chapter in a climate science denial book produced by the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA).

Ridd said โ€œwe can no longer trustโ€ the government-backed Australian Institute of Marine Science and the Center of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, based at James Cookย University.

The university alleged this constituted further โ€œserious misconductโ€ so Ridd took the issue to his lawyers, and a case is proceeding.

To help fund his legal bills, Ridd got some help from the IPA (a key organization pushing climate science denial in Australia for two decades) to set up a crowdfunding campaign that raised the necessary $95,000 in just 49ย hours.

The IPAโ€™s executive director John Roskam was the first donor with $500. Other notable givers included climate science denier blogger Anthony Watts, U.S. Interior Department employee and climate science denier Indur Goklany, Perth philanthropist and IPA funder Bryant McFee, and author and political scientist Don Aitken. (The Washington Post and others have reported how Goklany has had a key role in re-writing Department of Interior climateย documents.)

Many of Riddโ€™s cheerleaders have taken his scientific claims without skepticism and have not entertained the idea that he might beย wrong.

Riddโ€™s Marineย Pollution?

But Ridd repeated in detail several of his criticisms in a November 2017 โ€œViewpointโ€ article in the journal Marine Pollution Bulletin โ€” opening up his arguments forย scrutiny.

Now, as reported in The Guardian Australia, a team of nine scientists, many based at the Australian Institute of Marine Science and the James Cook University center Ridd has attacked, have issued a response through the same journal. Their assessment of Riddโ€™s claims isย sharp.

They say Riddโ€™s criticisms are based on โ€œmisinterpretation, selective use of data, and over-simplificationโ€ and that they ignore โ€œformal responses to previously publishedย critiques.โ€

While Ridd and his colleague Piers Larcombe argue their critiques are โ€œlargely ignored,โ€ these researchers point out that in fact, many of Riddโ€™s arguments have been directly addressed in the scientificย literature.

The Australian Institute of Marine Science researchers write: โ€œTo republish previous claims that have been addressed and refuted appears to be selecting information to support their statements and an example of the very issue Larcombe and Ridd (2018) areย criticizing.โ€

Ideologicalย Bent?

Also in the 2017 Sky News interview, Ridd accused others scientists of lacking objectivity and suggested another problem was that โ€œwe also potentially have scientists with an ideologicalย bent.โ€

This is the time to look at Riddโ€™s own โ€œideological bentโ€ and his long history associating with climate science deniers whose โ€œtheoriesโ€ are rejected by every major scientific academy on the planet, as well as governments around theย world.

Ridd has been affiliated with several groups that reject the science linking human emissions of carbon dioxide to dangerous climateย change.

Ridd is a director and โ€œscientific coordinatorโ€ of the Australian Environment Foundation (AEF) โ€” a group he has been associated with since its launch in 2005 (and not to be confused with the Australian Conservationย Foundation).

The AEF, which emerged from a 2004 meeting organized by the Institute of Public Affairs, promotes the idea that wind turbines make people sick and that human-caused climate change isย unproven.

Ridd is also listed as an adviser to the Galileo Movement โ€” an Australian group that for many years was run by former One Nation Senator and climate science denier Malcolm Roberts.

Ridd joined a list of well-known climate science deniers in 2009 when he co-signed an open letter coordinated by the Cato Institute โ€” a U.S. โ€œthink tankโ€ funded by petrochemical billionaires Charles and Davidย Koch.

The letter ran as a full-page ad in several newspapers, including The New York Times, and claimed that recent temperature changes were โ€œmodest,โ€ that the โ€œcase for alarm regarding climate change is grossly overstated,โ€ and global warming hadย stopped.

In 2011, Ridd called for a โ€œScientific Challengers Officeโ€ that โ€œshould start on Global Warmingโ€ and โ€œthe supposed threats to the Great Barrierย Reef.โ€

Ridd is based at the โ€œMarine Geophysics Laboratoryโ€ and, according to his university research profile, he โ€œraises almost all of his research funds from the profits of consultancy work which is usually associated with monitoring of marine dredgingย operation.โ€

Several major coal and gas projects are listed as former clients of the lab, which was also home for the late Dr. Bob Carter who was, at one time, associated with 10 or more different climate science denial groups around theย globe.

Ridd says he stands for โ€œtruth and honestyโ€ and has โ€œspent my whole life fighting for scientificย truth.โ€

The problem is that the version of the โ€œtruthโ€ he has been standing alongside, including his own arguments, have been repeatedly shot down by the world’s leading scientific institutions. Despite this, and despite the howls of his supporters, Ridd remains free to voice hisย โ€œtruth.โ€

Main image: Peter Ridd speaking at an Institute of Public Affairs event. Credit: YouTubeย screenshot

Related Posts

on

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.

Victoria Hewson called the 2050 ambition a โ€œhuge own goalโ€ while working for a Tufton Street think tank.
on

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.

Ahead of a city council vote, Resource Works launched an influence campaign with stock submissions for restaurant owners, hospitality workers, and residents.
on

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.

Ahead of the November 29 election, dairy producers tell Irish government to step off the โ€œtreadmillโ€ of unsustainable milk production โ€“ and share a more holistic vision.
on

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€