Indulge Them on Conspiracy Theories, And Deniers Might Just Warm to Climate Consensus

authordefault
on

This is a guest post byย ClimateDenierRoundup.

Aย new study inย the AMS journal Weather, Climate and Society suggests that thereโ€™s an interesting way to soften denier rejection of the consensus on climate change: validate their conspiracyย theories.

The approach outlined in the study is pretty simple. The researchers asked nearly 500 people to what extent they agreed with the sentiment that climate change is a hoax or conspiracy, along with a few other simple questions, like their political orientation. Then they gave respondents information about the consensus on climateย change.

But before the consensus message was delivered, the test subjects were also told that โ€œa majority of people acknowledge that on many topics, powerful people work to mislead citizens for bad purposes. Yet human induced climate change is not one of thoseย topics.โ€

Finally, people were asked to what extent they think climate change is caused by humans, as opposed to being a natural phenomenon. Researchers also asked if respondents would be interested in hearing more information about human-induced climateย change.

The hoax believers shown the statement that conspiracies exist then became more accepting of human causation than those conspiracy theorists who werenโ€™t shown the reaffirmingย statement.

On its face, itโ€™s a counterintuitive finding. How does validating conspiracies make people less likely to embrace them? The study doesnโ€™t delve into the psychology, but does suggest that offering that reassurance that sometimes conspiracies exist may make respondents โ€œfeel less motivated to defend their prior belief or worldview and be more open to consensus scientificย information.โ€

This hypothesis does make some sense. We know that denial is a psychological defense mechanism thatโ€™s triggered by unwanted information. By indulging peopleโ€™s natural skepticism and understanding that not all those with power use it for good, we can perhaps offer a bit of preemptive comfort before delivering the consensusย message.

In other words, conspiracy theorists/climate deniers may gain intellectual flexibility from feeling like theyโ€™re in a safe space rather than under attack. The acknowledgement that that yes, conspiracies exist but no, climate change isnโ€™t one of them, perhaps functions like something of an olive branch. Itโ€™s recognition that itโ€™s not totally insane to think that perhaps a group is lying about the climate for their ownย gain.

Because, to be fair, that is definitely a thing that happensย โ€ฆ

Main image: A sign from the 2017 People’s Climate March in Washington, D.C.ย Credit:ย Dcpeopleandeventsof2017,ย CC BYSAย 4.0

authordefault

Related Posts

Analysis
on

Canada has a higher calling than wasting time and political capital indulging fossil fuel fever dreams.

Canada has a higher calling than wasting time and political capital indulging fossil fuel fever dreams.
on

Nigel Farageโ€™s party was told by Offshore Energies UK to rethink its plan to thwart clean energy.

Nigel Farageโ€™s party was told by Offshore Energies UK to rethink its plan to thwart clean energy.
on

Lobbyists are pushing for the UKโ€™s AI boom to be fuelled by gas.

Lobbyists are pushing for the UKโ€™s AI boom to be fuelled by gas.

โ€œToothlessโ€ reforms to CAP funds are failing to protect vulnerable workforce, experts say.

โ€œToothlessโ€ reforms to CAP funds are failing to protect vulnerable workforce, experts say.