Open Letter: 75 Environmental Groups Call on Government to Abandon Drax Gas Plans

Open Letter: 75 Environmental Groups Call on Government to Abandon Drax Gas Plans
on

Environmentalists are urging the government to withhold support for what would be the UK’s largest gas plant.

A coalition of 75 groups has sent an open letter (published below) to the Planning Inspectorate and Energy Secretary Greg Clark, calling on the government to refuse to subsidise the plans.

Signatories include the Green Party, Friends of the Earth, and several Frack Free campaign groups.

Energy company Drax has submitted a planning application to replace its coal burning plants at a power station in Yorkshire with gas-fired units. The proposal was submitted after the government announced it would phase out all coal power generation by 2025. Drax is seeking government subsidy for the project. Today is the final day of consultation on the plans.

The groups are concerned the project would increase the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions and lead to a rise in demand for fracked gas, which is opposed by local communities across the UK. Drax has previously been criticised over its use of biomass from wood in its power plants, which campaigners claim has significant environmental impacts.


Open Letter

The undersigned organisations are deeply concerned about the climate and environmental impacts of Drax Repower’s proposal to replace its two remaining coal-fired units with much larger ones to burn gas.

Drax is already the U.K.’s single largest emitter of carbon dioxide. Its power station causes serious harm to the climate and the environment by burning more coal than any other UK plant and more wood than any other plant in the world. Much of the wood comes from the clearcutting of carbon rich forests in the southern US which lie at the heart of a global biodiversity hotspot.

With the UK government demanding a coal phase-out by 2025, Drax now wants to build the UK’s largest ever gas power units and is asking for substantial new subsidies, in addition to the £2 million a day it is already receiving for burning wood.

Drax itself admits in its Preliminary Environmental Information Report that its gas plans will: “represent a significant net increase in greenhouse gas emissions and have therefore negative climate impacts.”

In order to meet the goal of the Paris Climate Agreement, it is vital for the UK to phase out carbon emissions from fossil fuels and high-carbon biomass, not increase them. Permitting power stations such as Drax to burn large quantities of natural gas will push us beyond the 1.5 degree limit and prevent the UK from meeting its international climate change commitments. As the recent Oil Change International report states: “Opening new fossil gas fields is inconsistent with the Paris climate goals.”

Drax’s plan to replace coal with another fossil fuel will hamper rather than help the U.K.’s transition to low carbon energy, particularly since Drax has said that repurposing two coal units to burn gas will “extend their operation into the 2030s.” As the ecosystem scientist, Professor Robert W Howarth, from Cornell University, states: “There is no bridge fuel and switching from coal to shale gas is accelerating rather than slowing global warming.”

A further concern is that Drax’s proposal comes at a time when greater reliance on gas would require either increased Russian imports or dependence on unconventional gas, especially fracking and horizontal drilling. In spite of huge local and national opposition to fracking, the recent government proposal to transfer decisions on fracking from a local to a national level is increasing fears about a threat to local democracy from unconventional gas exploration.

According to Drill or Drop, there are already 3 active shale gas sites in the UK, with the UK’s first commercial scale fracking expected to start at Cuadrilla’s Preston New Road site in Lancashire imminently. A Freedom of Information request has revealed that the government expects there to be approximately 17 sites by 2020 and around 30 to 35 sites by 2022.

All gas production and transport is associated with leakage of the potent greenhouse gas methane, but unconventional gas comes with far greater methane emissions. Methane leakage in the production of gas for Drax would therefore greatly increase carbon emissions over and above the smokestack emissions.

Finally, we are concerned that Drax has stated that the project will need substantial funding from tax payers, in the form of Capacity Market Payment subsidies over a 15 year period.

The future of Drax power station may hinge on it receiving planning consent and these subsidies for new gas. Without them, the power station may no longer be profitable and have to close. This would reduce the UK’s carbon emissions, save biodiverse forests and protect communities from air pollution. It would also help the UK to meet its climate goals by creating a strong incentive to expand low-carbon renewable energy and investment in energy efficiency and conservation.

Therefore, we urge you to:

a) Refuse planning permission for the Drax Repower proposal because it is not a sustainable development and cannot be part of a transition to a low carbon economy;

b) Ensure that Drax cannot bid for Capacity Market payment subsidies for the proposed gas power units;

c) Focus support on genuinely renewable wind, wave and solar energy as well as on energy efficiency and conservation which can help us to meet our climate targets.

List of Signatories

UK

A Greener Hawick

Biofuelwatch

BP or not BP?

Breaking The Frame

Brighton Action Against Fracking

Campaign Against Climate Change

Climate Friendly Bradford on Avon

Climate Revolution

Coal Action Network

Colombia Solidarity Campaign

Corner House

Cumbria Action For Sustainability

Divest Hackney

Divest Parliament

Econexus UK

Energy Poverty Research Initiative

Frack Aware Barnsley

Frack Free Exmoor, Quantocks and Sedgemoor

Frack Free Leeds

Frack Free Ryedale

Frack Free Scarborough

Frack Free Surrey

Frack Free Sussex

Frack Free United

Frack Free Wakefield and District

Frack Off London

Frackwatch Glasgow

Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland

Friends of the Earth Glasgow group

Friends of the Earth Glastonbury group

Friends of the Earth Harrogate group

Friends of the Earth Newbury group

Friends of the Earth Torbay

Fuel Poverty Action

Global Justice Now Glasgow group

Green House Think Tank

Hereford Green Party

Initiative for Carbon Accounting (ICARB)

Kirklees Campaign against Climate Change

Landworkers Alliance

London Mining Network

Low Impact

New Economy Law

New Putney Debates

Occupy Environment Working Group (EEE)

Operation Noah

People and Planet

Reclaim The Power

Residents Action on Fylde Fracking

Roundhay Environmental Action Project

Sheffield Against Fracking

Sheffield Climate Alliance

Sustainable Pill and District

The C.H.E.E.S.E Project (The Cold Homes Energy Efficiency Survey Experts Project)

The Frack Free Food Alliance

Transition Falmouth

Treesponsiblity: Climate Action in Calderdale

UK Tar Sands Network

UK Youth Climate Coalition

UK Without Incineration Network

UK Green Party

Weald Action Group

Europe / International

Australian Forests and Climate Alliance (Australia)

Dogwood Alliance (USA)

Estonian Forest Aid

Food and Water Europe

Friends of the Earth US (USA)

Gastivists

Global Forest Coalition

Healthy Forest Coalition (Canada)

Noah – Friends of the Earth Denmark

Partnership for Policy Integrity (USA)

Real Democracy Movement (USA)

Skydda Skogan (Protect The Forest) (Sweden)

Upper Valley Affinity Group (USA)

Image: CorporateWatch/BioFuelWatch. Updated 29/08/2018: More signatories were added and the headline and text were updated to reflect this.

Open Letter: 75 Environmental Groups Call on Government to Abandon Drax Gas Plans

Related Posts

on

New analysis sheds light on key tactics Monsanto used to distort science and spin the narrative in defense of its herbicide product.

New analysis sheds light on key tactics Monsanto used to distort science and spin the narrative in defense of its herbicide product.
on

Campaigners warn Brussels is poised to water down — or fatally delay — bold pesticide reduction targets.

Campaigners warn Brussels is poised to water down — or fatally delay — bold pesticide reduction targets.
on

TC Energy’s upgrade of its GTN XPress pipeline would result in a huge increase in methane gas volumes to the region. But it would undermine climate laws already on the books.

TC Energy’s upgrade of its GTN XPress pipeline would result in a huge increase in methane gas volumes to the region. But it would undermine climate laws already on the books.
Analysis
on

After a decade of losing hundreds of billions of dollars, the shale oil industry is finally making money — and running out of oil.

After a decade of losing hundreds of billions of dollars, the shale oil industry is finally making money — and running out of oil.