'Shame on You': Campaigners Disrupt US Fossil Fuel Event Attended by Climate Science Deniers

authordefault
on

Campaigners disrupted a US event promoting โ€œgreener and cleanerโ€ fossil fuel energy at the UN climate talks, calling it โ€œa farceโ€ that had no place within the global climate negotiationsย process.

Minutes after the start of the event on the fringe of the climate conference in Katowice, Poland, dozens of youth activists, indigenous campaigners, and community leaders burst out laughing and stood up in front of the panel chanting โ€œkeep it in theย groundโ€.

A large banner with the message โ€œkeep it in the groundโ€ was deployed in a way to hide the panel from theย audience.

Aneesa Khan, 23, a member of the US group SustainUS, told theย event:

โ€œAs we sit here and listen to these fossil foolsย tell us about the fossil fuels,ย Iโ€™m here to speak truth to power and to tell you that climate change is a process of colonisation repeatingย itself.

โ€œMy mother has called me to say that our home in Chennai, India, has flooded once more and that next year we might be living through a drought. No one deserves this kind of suffering. We have to remember that these developed countries and the fossil fuel industries are the ones that have caused climate change and should be doing the work to reduce.โ€ย ย 

โ€œThe US elite has profited off fossil fuels for decades. Itโ€™s time for them to pay up and support the world transition away from dirty energy,โ€ sheย said.

Vic Barrett, who is one of the young plaintiffs taking a case against the US federal government, accusing it of violating their constitutional rights byย failing to reduce its emissions and contributing to climate change, told the gathering: โ€œIโ€™m 19-years-old and Iโ€™m pissed because my government has betrayed me. Iโ€™m actually suing myย governmentโ€.

โ€œWe will not let them fail us. We will not let them overtake their love of profits over what we know is right,โ€ theyย said.

Technologicalย Solutions

The panel of speakersย representing President Donald Trumpโ€™s administration โ€”ย which also included Australian ambassadorย Patrick Sucklingย โ€”ย kept quiet and smiled as protesters shared stories from communities on the frontlines of climate change which are already experiencing itsย impacts.

The event, called โ€œUS innovative technologies spur economic dynamismโ€, aimed to promote technological solutions and innovation to โ€œunleash greener and cleaner ways to develop fossil fuels and renewableย energyโ€.

The panellists advocated using carbon capture and storage (CCS), a technology that captures carbon dioxide emissions from power plants before they are released into the atmosphere. Theย industry promotes CCS as a solution as it would allow fossil fuel companies to continue operating for decades longer. However, the technologyย currentlyย is not commercially viable nor has it been developed atย scale.

Responding to the disruption, Wells Griffith, an advisor to the US Department of Energy on the implementation of the countryโ€™s energy strategy, said: โ€œFor the US energy policy, itโ€™s not about keeping [fossil fuels] in the ground but about using themย cleanly.โ€

Griffith added: โ€œAlarmism should not silence realism. This is a forum for fact science-based discussions on climateย realities.โ€

Pressed on the apparent discrepancy between the views of the panel pushing for the use of technologies to reduce fossil fuel emissions and statements made by President Trump in which he said he โ€œdidnโ€™t knowโ€ if climate change was man-made, a US delegation spokesman said he could notย comment.

Steven Winberg, who is responsible for the management of fossil energy at the US Energy Department, said the US had been developing CCS and CCUS (Carbon Capture Usage and Storage) technology for years and would continue to doย so.

Sitting in the front row were a string of notorious American climate science deniers. This included science deniers Marc Morano and Craig Rucker, the executive director of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT).


Marc Morano (pink shirt) and Craig Rucker (green shirt) attending the US pro-fossil fuel event at COP24. Image credit: Leoย Hickman

Sitting besides them was Rupert Darwall, who recently wrote a report for the UK-based climate science denying Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), criticising the UK Climate Change Act for being โ€œa social and economicย burdenโ€.

George David Banks, a former energy advisor to the Trump administration,ย also sat amongstย them.

Pointing at the panel as well as Morano and his peers, campaigners shouted โ€œshame on youโ€ before walking out, leaving the room more than halfย empty.

USย Obstruction

Since Trumpโ€™s election, the US has been largely obstructive in international climate negotiations. This is the second year in a row that campaigners have disrupted a US-heldย event promoting fossil fuels and nuclear energy during the UN climateย talks.

Outside the room, Khan, from the SustainUS delegation, said: โ€œShame on them [the US] for even thinking bringing the fossil fuel industry into this space isย okay.

โ€œClearly the developed countries of the world sit in the pocket of the fossil fuel industry and they have been disrupting this climate negotiations process and any real chance of any solution to climateย change.โ€

Khan added that instead of fossil fuels, the worlds needs โ€œreal community-led solutions to a just transition for jobs and energy towardsย renewablesโ€.

โ€œWe need to realise the solutions are being led by people on the ground who are black, brown, indigenous and low income communities in the global south,โ€ sheย said.

Michael Charles, from Navajo Nation, said the side event organised by the US administration was โ€œbasically aย jokeโ€.

โ€œAs US citizens weโ€™re here to try and keep our government accountable. We want to say shame on you for coming here and trying to disrupt the agenda of people working together to find solutions to climateย change.โ€

Intergovernmental Panel on Climateย Change

Campaigners who had stayed inside the room challenged the panel over the USโ€™s energy policy, but panellists repeatedly refused to take questions over whether the US recognised the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changeโ€™s (IPCC)ย findings.

The US was one of four major oil and gas producing countries โ€” alongside Saudi Arabia, Russia, and Kuwait โ€” that this weekend rejected a motion to โ€œwelcomeโ€ the findings of the IPCCโ€™s report about keeping warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. Instead, the US and its allies said the report should only beย โ€œnotedโ€.

The IPCC report, published in October, warned that the world had 12 years to take โ€œfar-reaching and unprecedented measuresโ€ to reduce emissions by 45 percent in order to limit global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees ofย warming.

Above this threshold, scientists from the IPCC warned that climate change impacts could be critical for the worldโ€™s ecosystems and peopleโ€™s homes, lives, andย jobs.

Speaking to DeSmog, Richard Powell, the executive director at ClearPath, a Washington-based organisation which describes itself as โ€œdeveloping and advancing conservative policies that accelerate clean energy innovationโ€,ย said:

โ€œIf you looked at the actions of the US government and the huge increases in clean energy over the past year, I would say this administration is at the very least very committed to making clean energy cheaper and moreย accessible.โ€

Powell did not want to comment on President Trumpโ€™s statements that he โ€œdidnโ€™t knowโ€ if climate change isย man-made.

Although Trump has repeatedly said he wanted the US to pull out of the Paris Agreement, this wonโ€™t be effective until 2020 and until then, a US delegation officially participates in the global climateย negotiations.

Image Credit: Greenpeace Poland

Related Posts

Analysis
on

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.

The Conservative leader, who attacked โ€œradical green absolutismโ€ in a Washington DC speech, recently met with a host of influential anti-climate figures.
on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
on

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.
on

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€