Majority of Americans Know Fossil Fuel Companies Drive Climate Change, Should Pay for Damages

authordefault
on

By Karen Savage, Climate Liability News. Originally posted on Climate Liability News.

The majority of Americans say fossil fuel companies should pay for damage caused by climate change, according to a recentย pollย released by Yale University onย Wednesday.

Researchersย askedย 5,131 Americans how much they think global warming is harming their local communities, who they think should be responsible for paying for the damages, and whether they support lawsuits to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for thoseย costs.

โ€œA majority of Americans say global warming is already harming their local community and hold the fossil fuel industry at least partly responsible for the damages,โ€ said Anthony Leiserowitz, a senior research scientist and director of Yale Universityโ€™s Program on Climate Changeย Communication.

The poll found that 57 percent of those surveyed think the fossil fuel companies have either a โ€œgreat dealโ€ or โ€œa moderate amountโ€ of responsibility for damages caused by climate change and 57 percent of the public thinks fossil fuel companies should be forced to pay for thoseย damages.

Half of those polled said they are in favor of their local officials filing liability suits against the companies, while only 30 percent somewhat or strongly oppose taking legalย action.

Fossil fuel companies haveย knownย forย decadesย that their products cause climate change, but publicly worked to deny that science while internally planning to protect their own business operations andย infrastructure.

Dozens ofย municipalitiesย acrossย theย countryย have filed lawsuits aimed at forcing fossil fuel companies to pay for the billions required to protect their residents from the impacts of climateย change.

โ€œThe results of this study suggest that there are other jurisdictions โ€” cities, counties, and states โ€” where a majority of the public already holds fossil fuel companies responsible, want them to pay at least some of the costs for damages, and even for their own local officials to participate in lawsuits,โ€ Leiserowitz said. He added that as damages and costs increase, there will likely be greater demand for companies to pay both for both climate-related damages and measures to protect residents from the worsening impacts of climateย change.

The majority of those surveyed think fossil fuel companies, not taxpayers, should pay for most or all of those damages. At the same time, two-thirds of those polled say they somewhat or strongly distrust fossil fuel companies.ย ย 

โ€œAlthough lawsuits are decided in the court of law,โ€ said Jennifer Marlon, a research scientist at Yaleโ€™s School of Forestry and Environmental Studies and the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, โ€œthe court of public opinion also plays a critical role in shaping the local, state, national, and international response to climateย change.โ€

The research was funded by theย Union of Concerned Scientists, theย Energy Foundation, theย 11th Hour Project, theย Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, theย MacArthur Foundation, theย Overlook Foundationย and theย Endeavor Foundation.

Main image: Exxon Knew Credit:ย Johnnyย Silvercloud,ย CC BYSAย 2.0

authordefault

Related Posts

on

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.

Tech firms like Amazon and Google โ€˜have enormous responsibilityโ€™ for driving fossil fuel expansions, climate expert argues.
on

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.

The Tory candidate is running her campaign from the home of a prominent anti-green activist.
on

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.

Peter Thiel, JD Vanceโ€™s former boss, also expresses confusion on climate, supporting expanded fossil fuel use while appearing unclear on the consequences.
on

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.

An emergency preparedness conference in Ottawa hosted two days of panels with only limited discussion of climate changeโ€™s root causes.