Comment: Of Course These Climate Science Deniers Jumped to Bolsonaro's Defence Over Amazon Fires

Opinion
authordefault
on

The burning of the Amazonย rainforest has unified the public in shock and fear like no other eventย in recent times. It has becomeย a symbol of where ecocide meets humanย suffering.

Dismay at the destruction has come from diverse voices โ โ€” from world leaders meeting at the G7 to indigenous people directly affected. But even in this moment, a cabal of commentators tied to networks pushing climate science denial have used their platform to defend theย destruction.

โ€œNot since the dictatorship have we lived through such a tough moment,โ€ Jaime Siqueira, the head ofย the Indigenous Work Centre (CTI), a Brazilian NGO supporting indigenous communities fighting to defend their lands, told the Guardian. Although Jair Bolsonaroโ€™sย hostility to indigenous rightsย is well-documented, the latest assault on the Amazon was not anticipated. Campaigners now believe that under Brazilโ€™s new administration indigenous communities face their most severe threat since theย 1970s.

Interesting then to hear Spikedโ€™s Peopleโ€™s Champion Brendan O’Neillย speaking up for destruction in anย inevitable tirade, arguing: โ€œBrazil is either a sovereign nation or it isnโ€™t. If it is a sovereign nation, then it has every right to pursue economic growth as it sees fit. The rainforest belongs to Brazilians.โ€

But clearly not the sort of Brazilians like Jaimeย Siqueira.

In Spikedโ€™s analysis there is no distinction between national reserves, indigenous land and communities and illegal logging:ย it’s all just ‘Brazil’. In Oโ€™Neillโ€™s analysis, the environmental catastrophe we face is either not happening at all or of secondary importance to the holy grail of economic development.ย Given the website is funded by the billionaire Koch industry empire, thatโ€™s perhaps noย surprise.

And there were others cheerleading Bolsonaro’s burning. Over atย Conservative Woman, Kathy Gyngellย cautions:

โ€œIn the heat built up over this apparent climate catastrophe, few appear to have stopped to question the accuracy of the initial reporting or the meaning of the original Nasa pictures. The Global Warming Policy Foundation, however, have drawn our attention to a number of articles which suggest that the MSM may have been stoking the flames ofย panic.โ€

This is the same Global Warming Policy Foundationย that was set up by Thatcherโ€™s former chancellor Nigel Lawson to cast doubt on mainstream climate science at every turn. The same Global Warming Policy Foundation that was part of a coordinated effort to push for a regulatory bonfire courtesy of Brexit. And the same Global Warming Policy Foundation of which Gyngell is now a director (a fact she notably doesnโ€™t disclose in herย article).

Matt Ridley, another Global Warming Policy Foundation affiliate (and another who does not declare his affiliation to the climate science denial campaign group), repeats O’Neill’s notion of the magic of economic development and growth inย The Spectator.

He argues:ย โ€œGetting people on to fossil fuels and away from burning wood for fuel spares trees. It is in the poorest countries, mainly in Africa, that men and women still gather firewood for cooking and bushmeat for food, instead of using electricity or gas and farmedย meat.โ€ย 

From this observation he makes an impressive leap, arguing: โ€œThe trouble with the apocalyptic rhetoric is that it can seem to justify drastic but dangerous solutions. The obsession with climate change has slowed the decline ofย deforestation.โ€

Ridley does concede that โ€œit is probably true that President Jair Bolsonaroโ€™s rhetoric has encouraged those who want to resume logging and clearing forest and contributed to this yearโ€™s uptick in fires in theย country.โ€

But, as befits his ideology, for Ridleyย the subject of blame should actually be (as usual) climate policy. In Ridleyโ€™s world, there is no climate crisis. There is no Amazon crisis. And if there was, it would be environmentalistsโ€™ faultย anyway.

This is perhaps depressingly predictable, as the people arguing that we embrace such destruction are those that stand to profit from it โ โ€” Ridley owns a coal mine, Oโ€™Neill’s website is funded by the Kochs, and Gyngell sits on the board of a group whose raison dโ€™etre is to persuade everyone that environmental regulation is entirelyย unnecessary.

All while the Amazonย burns.

Mike Small is the Founder and Editor ofย Bella Caledonia. He was DeSmogย UK‘s Deputy Editor from March to December 2018, andย continuesย toย contributeย toย theย publication.ย 

Main image:ย Fรกbio Rodrigues Pozzebom/Agรชncia Brasil/Wikimedia Commons CC BYย 2.0

Related Posts

on

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.

New documents show close coordination between the oil major and a coalition of free-market think tanks at a crucial moment in climate diplomacy.
on

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.

Lord Moynihan of Chelsea, who holds shares in Shell and TotalEnergies, called the green transition a โ€œchildrenโ€™s crusadeโ€.
on

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€

The head of the CO2 Coalition tells DeSmog that Wright agrees carbon dioxide is โ€œnot the demon molecule, itโ€™s the miracle molecule.โ€
on

Reformโ€™s deputy leader represents a high climate risk constituency while calling CO2 โ€œplant foodโ€.

Reformโ€™s deputy leader represents a high climate risk constituency while calling CO2 โ€œplant foodโ€.